Literature DB >> 28246150

Changes in the management and comorbidities of acromegaly over three decades: the French Acromegaly Registry.

Luigi Maione1,2,3, Thierry Brue4, Albert Beckers5, Brigitte Delemer6, Patrick Petrossians5, Françoise Borson-Chazot7,8,9, Olivier Chabre10, Patrick François11, Jérôme Bertherat12, Christine Cortet-Rudelli13, Philippe Chanson1,2,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Acromegaly is a rare disease associated with chronic multisystem complications. National registries have been created in several countries.
DESIGN: The French Registry contains data on acromegaly epidemiology, management and comorbidities recorded over more than three decades, retrospectively until 1999 and prospectively from 1999 to 2012.
RESULTS: Data could be analyzed for 999 of the 1034 patients included in the registry (46% males). Disease control, defined as IGF-I normalization (adjusted for age and sex), was achieved in 75% of patients at the last follow-up visit. Half the patients with uncontrolled disease had IGF-I levels below 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). The proportion of patients with surgically cured disease did not change markedly over time, whereas the proportion of patients with uncontrolled disease fell and the proportion of patients with medically controlled disease rose. Cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory and rheumatologic comorbidities and their outcomes were recorded for most patients, and no noteworthy overall deterioration was noted over time. Cancer occurred in 10% of patients, for a standardized incidence ratio of 1.34 (95% CI: 0.94-1.87) in men and 1.24 (0.77-1.73) in women. Forty-one patients died during follow-up, for a standardized mortality ratio of 1.05 (0.70-1.42). Most deaths were due to cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with acromegaly now have successful disease control thanks to the multistep management. The incidence of comorbidities following diagnosis of acromegaly is very low. Life expectancy is now close to that of the general population, probably owing to better management of the GH/IGF-I excess and comorbidities.
© 2017 European Society of Endocrinology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28246150     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-16-1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  39 in total

1.  The acromegalic spine: fractures, deformities and spinopelvic balance.

Authors:  Bruno de Azevedo Oliveira; Bruna Araujo; Tainá Mafalda Dos Santos; Bárbara Roberta Ongaratti; Carolina Garcia Soares Leães Rech; Nelson Pires Ferreira; Júlia Fernanda Semmelmann Pereira-Lima; Miriam da Costa Oliveira
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Epidemiology of acromegaly in Italy: analysis from a large longitudinal primary care database.

Authors:  Federico Gatto; Gianluca Trifirò; Francesco Lapi; Francesco Cocchiara; Claudia Campana; Carlotta Dell'Aquila; Carmen Ferrajolo; Marica Arvigo; Claudio Cricelli; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Pituitary gland: Gamma Knife for Cushing disease - time for a reappraisal?

Authors:  Frederic Castinetti; Thierry Brue
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 4.  Current perspectives on the impact of clinical disease and biochemical control on comorbidities and quality of life in acromegaly.

Authors:  Federico Gatto; Claudia Campana; Francesco Cocchiara; Giuliana Corica; Manuela Albertelli; Mara Boschetti; Gianluigi Zona; Diego Criminelli; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Patient-reported outcomes in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant in the ACROSTUDY extension: A real-world experience.

Authors:  Roberto Salvatori; Pietro Maffei; Susan M Webb; Thierry Brue; Jane Loftus; Srinivas Rao Valluri; Roy Gomez; Michael P Wajnrajch; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Evaluation of acromegaly treatment direct costs with respect to biochemical control and follow-up length.

Authors:  Francesco Cocchiara; Claudia Campana; Federica Nista; Giuliana Corica; Marco Ceraudo; Angelo Milioto; Diego Criminelli Rossi; Gianluigi Zona; Diego Ferone; Federico Gatto
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Acromegaly in the elderly patients.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Irene Gagliardi; Sabrina Chiloiro; Ana Gonçalves Ferreira; Marta Bondanelli; Antonella Giampietro; Antonio Bianchi; Laura De Marinis; Maria Fleseriu; Maria Chiara Zatelli
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  HOMA-IR in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Betina Biagetti; Anna Aulinas; Anna Casteras; Santiago Pérez-Hoyos; Rafael Simó
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Biochemical Response to First-Line Treatment With Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly: A Real-Life Perspective.

Authors:  Federica Nista; Giuliana Corica; Lara Castelletti; Keyvan Khorrami; Claudia Campana; Francesco Cocchiara; Gabriele Zoppoli; Alessandro Prior; Diego Criminelli Rossi; Gianluigi Zona; Diego Ferone; Federico Gatto
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 10.  Acromegaly and ultrasound: how, when and why?

Authors:  M Parolin; F Dassie; R Vettor; P Maffei
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.