Literature DB >> 28246083

Commissioning of specialist palliative care services in England.

Harriet Lancaster1, Ilora Finlay1, Maxwell Downman1, James Dumas1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Some failures in end-of-life care have been attributed to inconsistent provision of palliative care across England. We aimed to explore the variation in commissioning of services by Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) using a data collection exercise.
METHODS: We sent a Freedom of Information request in the form of an open questionnaire to all 209 CCGs in England to assess their commissioning of palliative and end-of-life care services, mainly focused on the provision of specialist palliative care services.
RESULTS: 29 CCGs provided information about the number of patients with some form of palliative care needs in their population. For specialist palliative care services, CCGs allocated budgets ranging from £51.83 to £2329.19 per patient per annum. 163 CCGs (77.90%) currently commission 7-day admission to their specialist palliative care beds. 82.84% of CCGs commission 7-day specialist palliative care services in patients' own homes and out-of-hours services rely heavily on hospice provision. 64 CCGs (31.37%) commission pain control teams, the majority of whom only operate in regular working hours. 68.14% of CCGs reported commissioning palliative care education of any sort for healthcare professionals and 44.85% of CCGs had no plans to update or review their palliative care services.
CONCLUSIONS: The most important finding from this exercise is that the information CCGs hold about their population and services is not standardised. However, information based on data that are more objective, for example, population and total budget for palliative care, demonstrate wide variations in commissioning. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Education and training; Home care; Hospice care; Hospital care; Service evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28246083     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  4 in total

1.  Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey.

Authors:  Alice M Firth; Suzanne M O'Brien; Ping Guo; Jane Seymour; Heather Richardson; Christopher Bridges; Mevhibe B Hocaoglu; Gunn Grande; Mendwas Dzingina; Irene J Higginson; Fliss Em Murtagh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 2.  Physicians' Conceptions of the Dying Patient: Scoping Review and Qualitative Content Analysis of the United Kingdom Medical Literature.

Authors:  Shaun Peter Qureshi; Derek Jones; Avril Dewar
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2022-08-18

3.  Development and validation of a casemix classification to predict costs of specialist palliative care provision across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings in the UK: a study protocol.

Authors:  Ping Guo; Mendwas Dzingina; Alice M Firth; Joanna M Davies; Abdel Douiri; Suzanne M O'Brien; Cathryn Pinto; Sophie Pask; Irene J Higginson; Kathy Eagar; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Is end-of-life care a priority for policymakers? Qualitative documentary analysis of health care strategies.

Authors:  Katherine E Sleeman; Javiera Leniz; Irene J Higginson; Katherine Bristowe
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.762

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.