Literature DB >> 28245090

Responses of belowground communities to large aboveground herbivores: Meta-analysis reveals biome-dependent patterns and critical research gaps.

Walter S Andriuzzi1, Diana H Wall1,2.   

Abstract

The importance of herbivore-plant and soil biota-plant interactions in terrestrial ecosystems is amply recognized, but the effects of aboveground herbivores on soil biota remain challenging to predict. To find global patterns in belowground responses to vertebrate herbivores, we performed a meta-analysis of studies that had measured abundance or activity of soil organisms inside and outside field exclosures (areas that excluded herbivores). Responses were often controlled by climate, ecosystem type, and dominant herbivore identity. Soil microfauna and especially root-feeding nematodes were negatively affected by herbivores in subarctic sites. In arid ecosystems, herbivore presence tended to reduce microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralization. Herbivores decreased soil respiration in subarctic ecosystems and increased it in temperate ecosystems, but had no net effect on microbial biomass or nitrogen mineralization in those ecosystems. Responses of soil fauna, microbial biomass, and nitrogen mineralization shifted from neutral to negative with increasing herbivore body size. Responses of animal decomposers tended to switch from negative to positive with increasing precipitation, but also differed among taxa, for instance Oribatida responded negatively to herbivores, whereas Collembola did not. Our findings imply that losses and gains of aboveground herbivores will interact with climate and land use changes, inducing functional shifts in soil communities. To conceptualize the mechanisms behind our findings and link them with previous theoretical frameworks, we propose two complementary approaches to predict soil biological responses to vertebrate herbivores, one focused on an herbivore body size gradient, and the other on a climate severity gradient. Major research gaps were revealed, with tropical biomes, protists, and soil macrofauna being especially overlooked.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aboveground-belowground interactions; decomposers; exclosure; grazing; mineralization; soil fauna; soil respiration; trophic level

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28245090     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

Review 1.  Soil biological responses to, and feedbacks on, trophic rewilding.

Authors:  W S Andriuzzi; D H Wall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A global inventory of animal diversity measured in different grazing treatments.

Authors:  Tianna Barber-Cross; Alessandro Filazzola; Charlotte Brown; Margarete A Dettlaff; Amgaa Batbaatar; Jessica S J Grenke; Isaac Peetoom Heida; James F Cahill
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 8.501

3.  Early life environmental exposures have a minor impact on the gut ecosystem following a natural birth.

Authors:  Nishat Tasnim; Candice Quin; Sandeep Gill; Chuanbin Dai; Miranda Hart; Deanna L Gibson
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  Long-term cattle grazing shifts the ecological state of forest soils.

Authors:  Willem Proesmans; Christopher Andrews; Alan Gray; Rob Griffiths; Aidan Keith; Uffe N Nielsen; David Spurgeon; Richard Pywell; Bridget Emmett; Adam J Vanbergen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Short-term effects of non-grazing on plants, soil biota and aboveground-belowground links in Atlantic mountain grasslands.

Authors:  Lur Epelde; Anders Lanzén; Iker Mijangos; Estibaliz Sarrionandia; Mikel Anza; Carlos Garbisu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Experimental herbivore exclusion, shrub introduction, and carbon sequestration in alpine plant communities.

Authors:  Mia Vedel Sørensen; Bente Jessen Graae; Dagmar Hagen; Brian J Enquist; Kristin Odden Nystuen; Richard Strimbeck
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.