Literature DB >> 28244584

Factors that could influence women's participation in colorectal cancer screening: an Italian study.

G Bocci1, G Troiano1, G Messina2, N Nante2, S Civitelli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 2nd most common cancer in women worldwide. In Italy, only 50% of people invited to get the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) decided to do it. Women's participation in breast and cervical screening is, instead, very high (>70%). The aim of our study was to investigate the beliefs, the feelings and the psychological factors that could influence the participation of women in CRC screening.
METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study, in the Hospital of Siena, Central Italy, in 2011. We administered a questionnaire to 507 women of all ages, who attended mammography or clinical breast examination. The adherence to CRC screening was analyzed only in the group of 207 older women (age >50 years). We performed descriptive, bivariate and logistic regression analysis to identify whether an association was present between participant characteristics, willingness and adherence to screening.
RESULTS: Family history of colorectal cancer (OR 4.3; p<0.007) and the General Practitioner's advice (OR: 3.4; p<0.003) were associated with a greater adherence to screening (colonoscopy). The embarrassment was another factor related to colonoscopy compliance (OR: 0.34; p<0.016).
CONCLUSION: Family history of CRC, pain or embarassment and GP's advice are the factors that correlated more strongly (positively or negatively) with adherence to colorectal cancer screening. These elements should be further analyzed to choose the best solution to improve the adherence in campaigns on colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Colorectal cancer; Italy; Screening; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28244584     DOI: 10.7416/ai.2017.2142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ig        ISSN: 1120-9135


  6 in total

1.  Familial colonoscopic screening: how do French general practitioners deal with patients and their high-risk relatives. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Isabelle Ingrand; Nicolas Palierne; Pauline Sarrazin; Yvan Desbordes; Clara Blanchard; Pierre Ingrand
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  An Online Survey and Focus Groups for Promoting Cancer Prevention Measures.

Authors:  Sumit K Shah; Maggie Jones-Carr; Milan Bimali; L Joseph Su; Mayumi Nakagawa
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Increase in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate by a Round-Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Testing Kit and Associated Factors in Underserved Regions of Korea: A Community-Based Intervention Study.

Authors:  Seri Hong; Hye Young Shin; Bomyee Lee; Na Rae Hwang; Sang-Hyun Hwang; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

4.  A survey on colonoscopy shows poor understanding of its protective value and widespread misconceptions across Europe.

Authors:  Bharat Amlani; Franco Radaelli; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Knowledge about cancer screening programmes in Sardinia.

Authors:  A Mereu; F Concu; C Dessì; M Girau; M T Ionta; L Lai; A Liori; M Masala; C D McGilliard; P Origa; M F Piazza; L Pisanu; B Soggiu; A Sotgiu; P Contu; C Sardu
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2019-12-20

6.  Could a Behavioral Model Explain Adherence to Second-Level Colonoscopy for Colon Cancer Screening? Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of the Palermo Province Population.

Authors:  Giuseppa Minutolo; Palmira Immordino; Alessia Dolce; Mario Valenza; Emanuele Amodio; Walter Mazzucco; Alessandra Casuccio; Vincenzo Restivo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.