M Ritt1, S Schülein, H Lubrich, L C Bollheimer, C C Sieber, K-G Gaßmann. 1. Martin Ritt, Department of Internal Medicine III (Medicine of Ageing), Geriatrics Center Erlangen, Hospital of the Congregation of St. Francis Sisters of Vierzehnheiligen, Rathsbergerstraße 57, D-91054 Erlangen, Tel: +49-(0)9131 822 3702, Fax: +49-(0)9131 822 3703, Email: Martin.Ritt@waldkrankenhaus.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed associations between a battery of gait characteristics and frailty status across four different frailty instruments in old patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Geriatric wards of a general hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 123 hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years. MEASUREMENTS: Spatio-temporal and three-dimensional gait characteristics were assessed by an electronic walkway and a shoe-mounted, inertial sensor-based mobile gait analysis system. Frailty status was assessed by the frailty phenotype (FP), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), frailty index (FI), and frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA). RESULTS: A reduction in walking speed (FP, FI, FI-CGA), stride length (FP, FI, FI-CGA), maximum toe clearance (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), toe off angle (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), heal strike angle (FI-CGA) and greater stride length variability (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), stride time variability (FP, FI), double support time (FP, FI), and stride width (CFA, FI-CGA) were associated with frailty status across the four frailty instruments (all P < 0.05, respectively). Walking speed (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), stride length (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), maximum toe clearance (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), toe off angle (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), heal strike angle (FP, FI), stride length variability (CFS, FI, FI-CGA), stride time variability (FI), double support time (FP), and stride width (FP, CFS, FI) were related with frailty severity across the four frailty instruments independent of age and sex (all P adjusted < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Gait changes in frail patients include more than solely a reduction in walking speed.
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed associations between a battery of gait characteristics and frailty status across four different frailty instruments in old patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Geriatric wards of a general hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 123 hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years. MEASUREMENTS: Spatio-temporal and three-dimensional gait characteristics were assessed by an electronic walkway and a shoe-mounted, inertial sensor-based mobile gait analysis system. Frailty status was assessed by the frailty phenotype (FP), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), frailty index (FI), and frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA). RESULTS: A reduction in walking speed (FP, FI, FI-CGA), stride length (FP, FI, FI-CGA), maximum toe clearance (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), toe off angle (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), heal strike angle (FI-CGA) and greater stride length variability (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), stride time variability (FP, FI), double support time (FP, FI), and stride width (CFA, FI-CGA) were associated with frailty status across the four frailty instruments (all P < 0.05, respectively). Walking speed (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), stride length (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), maximum toe clearance (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), toe off angle (FP, CFS, FI, FI-CGA), heal strike angle (FP, FI), stride length variability (CFS, FI, FI-CGA), stride time variability (FI), double support time (FP), and stride width (FP, CFS, FI) were related with frailty severity across the four frailty instruments independent of age and sex (all P adjusted < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Gait changes in frail patients include more than solely a reduction in walking speed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Frailty; gait characteristics; older people
Authors: Olga Theou; Lynne Cann; Joanna Blodgett; Lindsay M K Wallace; Thomas D Brothers; Kenneth Rockwood Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: John E Morley; Bruno Vellas; G Abellan van Kan; Stefan D Anker; Juergen M Bauer; Roberto Bernabei; Matteo Cesari; W C Chumlea; Wolfram Doehner; Jonathan Evans; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Paul R Katz; Theodore K Malmstrom; Roger J McCarter; Luis M Gutierrez Robledo; Ken Rockwood; Stephan von Haehling; Maurits F Vandewoude; Jeremy Walston Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Rita C Guedes; Rosângela C Dias; Leani S M Pereira; Sílvia L A Silva; Lygia P Lustosa; João M D Dias Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Markus S Anker; Stefan D Anker; Andrew J S Coats; Stephan von Haehling Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 12.910