Literature DB >> 28244473

Pattern of care in operable endometrial cancer treated at a rural-based tertiary care cancer center.

S B Dessai1, D Adrash1, M Geetha2, S Arvind3, J Bipin1, S Nayanar3, K Sachin1, M S Biji4, S Balasubramanian1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An audit was planned to study the demographics, staging, treatment details, and outcomes of operable endometrial cancers.
METHODOLOGY: All operable endometrial cancers treated between January 2009 and October 2014 were included in the study. The details regarding demographics, staging, surgical procedure, pathological staging, adjuvant treatment, and outcomes were extracted from the case records. Descriptive statistics was performed. The time-to-event analysis was done by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: There were 55 patients with a median age of 59 years (35-73 years). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 in 52 patients (94.5%) and 2 in 3 patients (5.5%). Forty-nine patients (89.1%) had disease restricted to endometrium while 6 patients (10.9%) had cervical involvement. The surgery done was Type I hysterectomy in 49 patients (89.1%), Type II in 5 patients (9.1%), and Type III in 1 patient (1.8%). Pelvic lymph node dissection was done in all patients while para-aortic (infrahilar) dissection was done in 48 patients (87.3%). The pathological stages were Stage IA in 19 patients, Stage IB in 15 patients, Stage II in 4 patients, Stage IIIA in 3 patients, Stage IIIB in 2 patients, Stage IIIC1 in 5 patients, Stage IIIC2 in 4 patients, and Stage IV in 3 patients. Grade 1 tumors were seen in 23 patients, Grade 2 in 13 patients, and Grade 3 in 19 patients. The histology was endometrioid in 44 patients, serous in 6 patients, clear cell in 3 patients, and others in 2 patients. Adjuvant treatment was received by 40 patients. With a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 3-year DFS and OS were 78% and 82%, respectively. Age >59 years, Stage III or greater, and Grade 3 tumors were independent prognostic factors adversely affecting both DFS and OS.
CONCLUSION: The outcomes in our study are comparable to that seen in Western literature. Elderly status, higher stage, and a poorly differentiated tumor are associated with poor outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28244473     DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.200678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Cancer        ISSN: 0019-509X            Impact factor:   1.224


  4 in total

Review 1.  The COVID-19 Pandemic and Implications for Gynaecologic Cancer Care.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Seema Singhal
Journal:  Indian J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-24

2.  Upregulation of syncytin-1 promotes invasion and metastasis by activating epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related pathway in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Changmin Liu; Jiqin Xu; Feifei Wen; Fangfang Yang; Xiaoming Li; Dianzhong Geng; Lei Li; Jiming Chen; Jing Zheng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  BMI‑1 promotes invasion and metastasis in endometrial adenocarcinoma and is a poor prognostic factor.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Ling Chen; Zhenhua Bao; Ying Liu; Guohong Liu; Fengling Li; Lianqin Li
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Subbiah Shanmugam; Rajkiran Thanikachalam; Arul Murugan
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2020-01-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.