Literature DB >> 28244284

Nosocomial Infection in Adult Patients Undergoing Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Gwan Sic Kim1, Kyo Seon Lee1, Choung Kyu Park2, Seung Ku Kang1, Do Wan Kim1, Sang Gi Oh1, Bong Suk Oh1, Yochun Jung1, Seok Kim1, Ju Sik Yun1, Sang Yun Song1, Kook Joo Na1, In Seok Jeong1, Byoung Hee Ahn3.   

Abstract

Data on the frequency of nosocomial infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in adult populations remain scarce. We investigated the risk factors for nosocomial infections in adult patients undergoing venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) support. From January 2011 to December 2015, a total of 259 patients underwent ECMO. Of these, patients aged 17 years or less and patients undergoing ECMO for less than 48 hours were excluded. Of these, 61 patients diagnosed with cardiogenic shock were evaluated. Mean patient age was 60.6 ± 14.3 years and 21 (34.4%) patients were female. The mean preoperative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 8.6 ± 2.2. The mean duration of ECMO support was 6.8 ± 7.4 days. The rates of successful ECMO weaning and survival to discharge were 44.3% and 31.1%, respectively. There were 18 nosocomial infections in 14 (23.0%) patients. These included respiratory tract infections in 9 cases and bloodstream infections in a further 9. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of infection during ECMO were the preoperative creatinine level (hazard ratio [HR], 2.176; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.065-4.447; P = 0.033) and the duration of ECMO support (HR, 1.400; 95% CI, 1.081-1.815; P = 0.011). A higher preoperative creatinine level and an extended duration of ECMO support are risk factors for infection. Therefore, to avoid the development of nosocomial infections, strategies to shorten the length of ECMO support should be applied whenever possible.
© 2017 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support; Infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28244284      PMCID: PMC5334156          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.4.593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


INTRODUCTION

In the time since the first successful application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in 1972 (1), ECMO has become one of the most important therapeutic modalities for severe cardiopulmonary failure (2). The use of ECMO to treat adults has increased greatly since the H1N1 influenza pandemic of 2009 and publication of the findings of a multicenter randomized trial of treatments for severe adult respiratory failure (the CESAR trial) (34). Although the experience of clinicians with ECMO therapy in adult populations is growing, ECMO is still associated with high-level mortality and many potential complications. Of these, nosocomial infection (NI) is associated with high-level mortality (56). Adult patients undergoing ECMO are at higher risk for nosocomial infection than neonate and pediatric patients (6.1% of neonates and pediatric patients vs. 20.5% of adults develop culture-proven infections during ECMO) (5). However, data on NIs acquired during ECMO in the adult populations remain scarce. Although a few studies have explored this topic (78), the works have been limited in terms of patient numbers considerable heterogeneity in patient baseline characteristics including the ECMO mode employed (venovenous vs. venoarterial), the indications for ECMO, and the ECMO cannulation site (percutaneous vs. intrathoracic). Such heterogeneity may affect the incidence of NI development during ECMO. Thus, further work with a homogeneous patient group is required to precisely identify risk factors for NI in patients on ECMO support. Therefore, we investigated the risk factors for NIs in patients with cardiogenic shock who underwent percutaneous venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) support.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

From January 2011 to December 2015, 259 consecutive patients underwent ECMO at Chonnam National University Hospital. Patients aged 17 years or less were excluded. Patients who underwent ECMO for < 48 hours were not included in this study since they were not exposed to ECMO long enough to identify ECMO-related infection events. A total of 95 adult patients underwent VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock. Of these, 34 adult patients underwent ECMO support for < 48 hours. Among the 34 patients, 2 patients survived and 32 patients were non-survivors. The cause of death in the 32 non-survivor patients included hypoxic brain death in 8 patients and multi-organ failure in 24. However, there was no sepsis-related death in these patients. Finally, cardiogenic shock patients (n = 61) undergoing ECMO for ≥ 48 hours were evaluated. Weaning success rate, survival to discharge, and infection incidence on ECMO were assessed through hospital records. Baseline characteristics and operative information including age, gender, underlying conditions, pre-ECMO laboratory findings, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, chest X-ray state (1 point per quadrant infiltrated) before ECMO, transfusion history before ECMO, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay before ECMO, type and mode of ECMO, type of anticoagulation, and duration of ECMO support were collected and evaluated. Each patient's survival at the time of ECMO de-cannulation and at the time of discharge was also evaluated in terms of weaning success rate and survival to discharge.

ECMO procedures

Cannulation of ECMO was performed in a sterile fashion with chlorhexidine painting. In ECMO-eligible patients, an emergency bypass system (n = 38, 62.3%; Terumo Inc., Tokyo, Japan) or a permanent life support system (n = 23, 37.7%; Maquet Inc., Hirrlingen, Germany) was applied. The oxygenator of the permanent life support system is a polymethylpentene (PMP) type. The emergency bypass system is a non-PMP type oxygenator. Recently, the Maquet system has been more commonly used than the Terumo system, which is known to be the more durable and thrombo-resistant device (9). Heparin or nafamostat mesilate was used as an anticoagulant. Cannulation mode, size, and approach site were determined by the surgeon considering the patient's body weight, height, and vessel size. A peripheral approach using femoral artery and vein was the predominant approach in the study. The management protocol for ECMO follows the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guidelines (10).

Definition of nosocomial infection during ECMO support

The definition of nosocomial infections during ECMO support was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions for nosocomial infections (11). Nosocomial infection during ECMO support was defined as a case with confirmed organisms from one or more blood, respiratory, or urinary cultures during the period 48 hours after the initiation of ECMO to 24 hours after ECMO weaning. Microbiological isolations were correlated with clinical symptoms and typical inflammatory characteristics in blood samples and radiographic findings.

Antibiotics strategy

Prophylactic antibiotics with broad spectrum drug was prescribed to patients at the initiation of ECMO support. In patients who had already been taking antibiotics, antibiotic agents were maintained. If infection developed during ECMO support, antibiotics were changed according to the culture results. With regard to dosing of antibiotics, conventional dose was started and adjusted according to the drug concentration monitoring. Every antibiotic therapy was discussed with the department of infection and adjusted according to the patient's clinical situations.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages and continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Student's t-tests and χ2 tests were used to compare factors related to nosocomial infection. We performed the logistic regression using nosocomial infection as the dependent variable. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University Hospital, which waived the requirement for informed patient consent based on the retrospective nature of the work (IRB No: CNUH-2016-228).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

The 61 patients with cardiogenic shock underwent ECMO for a total of 416.0 days. The mean age of patients at the time of ECMO support was 60.6 ± 14.3 years, and 34.4% (n = 21) were female. A total of 42.6% (n = 26) of patients had hypertension and 41.0% (n = 25) diabetes mellitus. The infiltration status of pre-ECMO chest X-rays was 1.6 ± 1.4. Eighteen patients (29.5%) had a transfusion history before ECMO. Pre-ECMO hospital and ICU stays before ECMO were 4.4 ± 6.5 and 1.8 ± 2.5 days, respectively (Table 1). Venoarterial type was the predominant ECMO type in 95.1% (n = 58) of the patients. Venoarterial-venous type of ECMO was applied in 3 patients (4.9%). According to the ECMO oxygenator type, the non-PMP oxygenator was used in 38 patients (62.3%) and the PMP type in 23 patients (37.7%). Anticoagulation was performed using heparin in 88.6% (n = 54) of patients. The duration of ECMO support was 6.8 ± 7.4 days (Table 2).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics before ECMO support

CharacteristicsValue*
No. of patients61
Age, yr60.6 ± 14.3
Female gender21 (34.4)
Body weight, kg62.1 ± 11.8
Underlying condition
 Hypertension26 (42.6)
 Diabetes mellitus25 (41.0)
 Coronary artery disease10 (16.4)
 Chronic renal disease5 (8.2)
 Acute kidney injury3 (4.9)
 Dialysis3 (4.9)
 COPD1 (1.6)
 Cerebrovascular accident2 (3.3)
Laboratory findings
 White blood cell (103/mm3)12.8 ± 5.9
 Hemoglobin, g/dL11.9 ± 2.8
 Platelets (103/mm3)204.7 ± 77.8
 CRP, mg/dL4.6 ± 6.2
 Lactate, mmol/L8.9 ± 4.7
 Total bilirubin, mg/dL1.1 ± 0.9
 Creatinine, mg/dL1.5 ± 1.2
SOFA score8.6 ± 2.2
Infiltration status on CXR1.6 ± 1.4
Transfusion history18 (29.5)
Pre-ECMO ICU stay, day1.8 ± 2.5
Pre-ECMO hospital stay, day4.4 ± 6.5

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease, CXR = chest X-ray, CRP = C-reactive protein, ICU = intensive care unit, SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

*Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables; †One point for each quadrant infiltrated (0–4).

Table 2

ECMO data of patients

Parameters of ECMOValue*
No. of patients61
ECMO support
 Venoarterial mode58 (95.1)
 Venoarterial-venous mode3 (4.9)
Type of ECMO oxygenator
 Non-PMP membrane38 (62.3)
 PMP membrane23 (37.7)
Anticoagulation drug used
 Heparin54 (88.6)
 Nafamostat mesilate7 (11.4)
Duration of ECMO support, day6.8 ± 7.4

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PMP = polymethylpentene.

*Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables.

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease, CXR = chest X-ray, CRP = C-reactive protein, ICU = intensive care unit, SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. *Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables; †One point for each quadrant infiltrated (0–4). ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PMP = polymethylpentene. *Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables.

Early outcomes and infection incidence

The rates of weaning success and survival to discharge were 44.3% (27/61) and 31.1% (19/61), respectively. There were 18 nosocomial infection events of 14 (23.0%) patients. The incidence of ECMO-related nosocomial infection was 43.3 cases per 1,000 ECMO-days. These included bloodstream infection (BSI) in 9 cases, and respiratory tract infection (RTI) in 9 cases (Table 3). However, there was no urinary tract infection (UTI) and surgical site wound infection.
Table 3

Microorganisms causing infections during ECMO support

Microorganism speciesRTI (n = 9)BSI (n = 9)
Gram-negative pathogens
A. baumannii82
P. aeruginosa02
Enterobacter cloacae00
Serratia marcescens01
Klebsiella pneumonia01
Gram-positive pathogens
S. aureus01
Staphylococcus epidermidis01
Corynebacterium striatum01
Fungi
Candida albicans10
Candida tropicalis00

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, RTI = respiratory tract infection, BSI = bloodstream infection.

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, RTI = respiratory tract infection, BSI = bloodstream infection.

Causative microorganisms of nosocomial infection

The offending organisms associated with nosocomial infection are shown in Table 3. Gram-negative pathogens were predominant in both RTI and BSI. Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 8, 88.9%) was the most common respiratory tract pathogens. In terms of BSI, A. baumannii (n = 2), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2) were the most common pathogens.

The characteristics and ECMO outcomes of patients with and without nosocomial infections

The baseline characteristic data for 47 patients without nosocomial infection and 14 patients with nosocomial infection are shown in Tables 4 and 5. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, body weight, underlying condition, laboratory findings, infiltration state in chest X-ray, ICU and hospital stay before ECMO, ECMO oxygenator type and anticoagulation drug type. However, patients with nosocomial infection underwent ECMO for a longer period than patients without nosocomial infection (14.5 ± 12.4 days vs. 4.5 ± 2.4 days, P = 0.010). The rates of weaning success and survival to discharge were higher in patients without nosocomial infection than in patients with nosocomial infection, (48.9% vs. 28.6% and 36.2% vs. 14.3%, respectively); however, the differences were not significant (P = 0.228 and P = 0.190, respectively).
Table 4

The characteristics of patients with and without nosocomial infections during ECMO

Risk factorsWithout infection*(n = 47)With infection*(n = 14)P value
Age, yr61.3 ± 14.958.5 ± 12.50.529
Female gender14 (29.8)7 (50.0)0.206
Body weight, kg62.9 ± 12.159.6 ± 10.50.369
Underlying condition
 Hypertension19 (40.4)7 (50.0)0.553
 Diabetes mellitus18 (38.3)7 (50.0)0.540
 Coronary artery disease7 (14.9)3 (21.4)0.683
 Chronic renal disease3 (6.4)2 (14.3)0.322
 Acute kidney injury3 (6.4)0> 0.999
 Dialysis2 (4.3)1 (7.1)0.549
 COPD01 (7.1)0.230
 Cerebrovascular accident2 (4.3)0> 0.999
Laboratory findings
 White blood cell (103/mm3)12.5 ± 6.113.7 ± 5.20.490
 Hemoglobin, g/dL12.1 ± 2.811.2 ± 3.00.310
 Platelets (103/mm3)204.8 ± 82.2204.4 ± 63.50.989
 CRP, mg/dL4.8 ± 6.63.7 ± 5.10.563
 Lactate, mmol/L8.7 ± 4.49.7 ± 5.70.499
 Total bilirubin, mg/dL1.1 ± 0.91.1 ± 1.10.819
 Creatinine, mg/dL1.4 ± 0.82.1 ± 2.10.227
SOFA score8.5 ± 2.49.0 ± 1.70.473
Infiltration status on CXR1.6 ± 1.41.6 ± 1.60.874
Peak body temperature, ℃37.3 ± 1.337.2 ± 1.00.667
Transfusion history17 (36.2)1 (7.1)0.047
Pre-ECMO ICU stay, day1.7 ± 2.02.1 ± 3.70.599
Pre-ECMO hospital stay, day4.5 ± 7.03.9 ± 4.30.747

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease, CRP = C-reactive protein, CXR = chest X-ray, ICU = intensive care unit, SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

*Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables.

Table 5

Outcomes of ECMO support in patients with and without nosocomial infections

OutcomesWithout infection* (n = 47)With infection* (n = 14)P value
ECMO oxygenator type0.756
 Non-PMP membrane30 (63.8)8 (57.1)
 PMP membrane17 (36.2)6 (42.9)
Anticoagulation drug given0.710
 Heparin42 (89.3)12 (85.7)
 Nafamostat mesilate5 (10.7)2 (14.3)
ECMO support duration, day4.5 ± 2.414.5 ± 12.40.010
ECMO weaning0.228
 Success23 (48.9)4 (28.6)
 Failure24 (51.1)10 (71.4)
Survival to discharge0.190
 Yes17 (36.2)2 (14.3)
 No30 (63.8)12 (85.7)

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PMP = polymethylpentene.

*Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables.

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease, CRP = C-reactive protein, CXR = chest X-ray, ICU = intensive care unit, SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. *Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PMP = polymethylpentene. *Data are presented as numbers of cases (%) for categorical variables or as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for nosocomial infection

In the logistic regression analysis, pre-specified covariates were included in this analysis. Independent predictors of infection during ECMO were a higher preoperative creatinine level (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.176; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.065–4.447; P = 0.033) and the duration of ECMO support (adjusted OR, 1.400; 95% CI, 1.081–1.815; P = 0.011) (Table 6). Fig. 1 shows the incidence of infection according to the duration of ECMO.
Table 6

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for nosocomial infection

VariablesAdjusted OR (95% CI)P value
Pre-ECMO creatinine level, mg/dL2.176 (1.065–4.447)0.033
Duration of ECMO support, day1.400 (1.081–1.815)0.011

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

*Variables with a probability valve < 0.20 in univariate analyses were candidates for multivariate analysis. The candidate variables were gender, pre-ECMO creatinine level, transfusion history, and duration of ECMO support.

Fig. 1

The incidence of infection according to the duration of ECMO.

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. *Variables with a probability valve < 0.20 in univariate analyses were candidates for multivariate analysis. The candidate variables were gender, pre-ECMO creatinine level, transfusion history, and duration of ECMO support. The incidence of infection according to the duration of ECMO. ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

DISCUSSION

We found that the incidence of nosocomial infection in an adult population undergoing ECMO was 43.3 cases per 1,000 ECMO-days. In multivariate analyses, both a higher preoperative creatinine level and the duration of ECMO support were independently associated with nosocomial infection. ECMO patients are at an increased risk for infections as a consequence of being in an ICU. Mechanical ventilators, central venous catheters, indwelling urinary catheters, surgical incisions, and health care providers are all sources of infection for ECMO patients. In general, the rate of nosocomial infection in the ICU has ranged from 13.9% to more than 44.0% (1213). In terms of the site of nosocomial infection, Vincent et al. (12) analyzed data from 1,417 ICUs in Europe to determine the incidence of pathogens and infections; pneumonia and other lower RTIs (64.7%) were the most common diseases, followed by UTI (17.6%) and BSI (12.0%). However, among infections during ECMO support, BSI was the most common, occurring in 32.6% to 89.4%, and BSIs were predominant in most studies, followed by RTIs, UTIs, and surgical site infections (71415). In our study, the infection site differed from that of the general ECMO cohort. We found that the incidence of RTI was similar to that of BSI. We found that the hazard ratio for nosocomial infection in patients with higher levels of preoperative creatinine was 2.176 (P = 0.033). Although the precise mechanism by which increased preoperative creatinine increases the risk of nosocomial infection remains unknown, some data suggest that increased serum levels of creatinine correlate with nosocomial infection. An increase in creatinine levels reflects the presence of kidney disease; an injured kidney may compromise the immune response via systemic release from leukocytes in the kidneys and renal tubular cells (1617181920). Such changes in the host immune response may be associated with nosocomial infection. We also found that the duration of ECMO was a risk factor for infection. Many previous studies showed that the duration of ECMO support was the most important risk factor of acquired infection during ECMO and was associated with a significantly increased rate of death (71415). Burket et al. (21) reported that the rate of BSI increased with the duration of ECMO support. Among patients who underwent ECMO for 3–10 days, the rate of BSI was 9.5 cases per 1,000 ECMO-days, and among those who underwent ECMO for 11–20 days and 21–30 days, the rates of BSI increased to 27.2 cases per 1,000 ECMO-days and 64.5 cases per 1,000 ECMO-days, respectively. We found that a longer duration of ECMO was associated with nosocomial infection. The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve showed that a cut-off point of 3.7 days was significant. The incidence of nosocomial infection was higher in patients who underwent ECMO for > 3.7 days than for shorter times. However, nosocomial infection did not affect survival to discharge. This may be because of our small patient numbers. Further studies on larger cohorts are required. In terms of the causative microorganisms, large-scale international data show that Staphylococcus aureus and other Staphylococcus species (38%) are the most common pathogens causing BSIs, followed by Escherichia coli (24%), in critically ill patients without ECMO support (1222). In addition, Candida species are often isolated in the ICU and can cause pneumonia and BSIs with a mortality rate of up to 47% (1222). On the other hand, microbes are commonly associated with medical device-related infections in patients with ECMO support, such as coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Candida species (7). However, the balance is shifting from multi-resistant staphylococci to highly resistant classes of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa (23). In our study, A. baumannii was the most common pathogen in both blood and the respiratory tract, which would be a common pathogen in the ICU environment. We encountered no case of fungal infection (for example, Candida) in the present study. This may have been due to the short duration of ECMO compared with those in other ECMO cohort studies. This study had the limitations inherent in retrospective work using observational data from a single center. Although our patient numbers were too low to allow us to draw strong conclusions, we sought to identify precise risk factors in a homogeneous group. A higher preoperative creatinine level and an extended duration of ECMO support were risk factors for nosocomial infection. Therefore, to avoid the development of nosocomial infections, strategies shortening the length of ECMO support should be applied whenever possible.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal life support: history and new directions.

Authors:  Robert H Bartlett
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Comparison of intensive-care-unit-acquired infections and their outcomes among patients over and under 80 years of age.

Authors:  J-M Maillet; E Guérot; A Novara; J Le Guen; H Lahjibi-Paulet; G Kac; J-L Diehl; J-Y Fagon
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Epidemiology of infections acquired in intensive care units.

Authors:  Joseph S Doyle; Kirsty L Buising; Karin A Thursky; Leon J Worth; Michael J Richards
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.119

4.  Nosocomial infections in adult cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Nicolas Bréchot; Sarah Hariri; Marguerite Guiguet; Charles Edouard Luyt; Ralouka Makri; Pascal Leprince; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Alain Pavie; Jean Chastre; Alain Combes
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988.

Authors:  J S Garner; W R Jarvis; T G Emori; T C Horan; J M Hughes
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Healthcare-associated infection in pediatric patients on extracorporeal life support: The role of multidisciplinary surveillance.

Authors:  Kate L Brown; Deborah A Ridout; Mike Shaw; Iris Dodkins; Liz C Smith; Maura A O'Callaghan; Allan P Goldman; Susan Macqueen; John C Hartley
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Infections acquired by adults who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: risk factors and outcome.

Authors:  Cecile Aubron; Allen C Cheng; David Pilcher; Tim Leong; Geoff Magrin; D Jamie Cooper; Carlos Scheinkestel; Vince Pellegrino
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  The local and systemic inflammatory transcriptome after acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Dmitry N Grigoryev; Manchang Liu; Heitham T Hassoun; Chris Cheadle; Kathleen C Barnes; Hamid Rabb
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Report 2012.

Authors:  Matthew L Paden; Steven A Conrad; Peter T Rycus; Ravi R Thiagarajan
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee.

Authors:  J L Vincent; D J Bihari; P M Suter; H A Bruining; J White; M H Nicolas-Chanoin; M Wolff; R C Spencer; M Hemmer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Outcome and Clinical Characteristics of Nosocomial Infection in Adult Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiyuan Li; Liangshan Wang; Hong Wang; Xiaotong Hou
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Bloodstream infections in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Jian-Rong Wang; Jin-Yu Huang; Wei Hu; Xue-Ying Cai; Wei-Hang Hu; Ying Zhu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  Clinical and microbiological characteristics of and risk factors for bloodstream infections among patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eun Hwa Lee; Ki Hyun Lee; Se Ju Lee; Jinnam Kim; Yae Jee Baek; Jin Young Ahn; Su Jin Jeong; Nam Su Ku; Jun Yong Choi; Joon-Sup Yeom; Young Goo Song; Jung Ho Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Diagnostic yield of routine daily blood culture in patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Quentin de Roux; Marie Renaudier; Wulfran Bougouin; Johanna Boccara; Vincent Fihman; Raphaël Lepeule; Chamsedine Cherait; Antonio Fiore; François Hemery; Jean-Winoc Decousser; Olivier Langeron; Nicolas Mongardon
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Predictive Value of Procalcitonin for Infection and Survival in Adult Cardiogenic Shock Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Do Wan Kim; Hwa Jin Cho; Gwan Sic Kim; Sang Yun Song; Kook Joo Na; Sang Gi Oh; Bong Suk Oh; In Seok Jeong
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2018-01-25

6.  Risk factors and prognosis of nosocomial pneumonia in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jianrong Wang; Jinyu Huang; Wei Hu; Xueying Cai; Weihang Hu; Ying Zhu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Related Nosocomial Infection after Cardiac Surgery in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Liangshan Wang; Ming Jia; Zhongtao Du; Xiaotong Hou
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-12-03

8.  Understanding the "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation gap" in veno-arterial configuration for adult patients: Timing and causes of death.

Authors:  Maged Makhoul; Samuel Heuts; Abdulrahman Mansouri; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Amir Obeid; Belliato Mirko; Lars Mikael Broman; Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner; Paolo Meani; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Thijs Delnoij; Jos Maessen; Gil Bolotin; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.094

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.