| Literature DB >> 28243400 |
Jamal Seidi1, Shahrokh Ebnerasooli2, Sirous Shahsawari3, Simin Nzarian4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to Iranian traditional medicine, using safe ginger may contribute to taking less chemical medicines and result in fewer side effects.Entities:
Keywords: Cataract; General anesthesia; Ginger; Nausea; Operation; Vomiting
Year: 2017 PMID: 28243400 PMCID: PMC5308488 DOI: 10.19082/3508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Electron Physician ISSN: 2008-5842
Comparison the frequency of nausea occurrence among the three groups in various times (Pearson Chi-Square Test, df = 2)
| Number of Measurements | Group | Nausea | p-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Total | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |||
| In Recovery | Intervention 1 | 4 | 10 | 36 | 90 | 40 | 100 | p < 0.001 |
| Intervention 2 | 6 | 15.8 | 32 | 84.2 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100 | 42 | 100 | ||
| Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 6 | 15 | 34 | 85 | 40 | 100 | p > 0.3 |
| Intervention 2 | 5 | 13.2 | 33 | 86.8 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100 | 42 | 100 | ||
| Two Hours After Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 4 | 10 | 36 | 90 | 40 | 100 | p < 0.04 |
| Intervention 2 | 3 | 7.5 | 37 | 86.5 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100 | 42 | 100 | ||
| 6 Hours After Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 39 | 97.5 | 40 | 100 | p < 0.02 |
| Intervention 2 | 5 | 13.2 | 33 | 86.8 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 1 | 2.4 | 41 | 97.6 | 42 | 100 | ||
| Total | 122 | 100 | ||||||
Comparison of nausea severity among the three groups in various times (Kruskal-Wallis test)
| Nausea | Group | Mean | SD | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In Recovery | Intervention 1 | 0.725 | 1.61 | 0.771 |
| Intervention 2 | 0.590 | 1.39 | ||
| Control | 0.62 | 1.47 | ||
| Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.038 |
| Intervention 2 | 0.68 | 1.64 | ||
| Control | 0.1 | 0.6 | ||
| Two Hours After Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 0.25 | 0.63 | 0.028 |
| Intervention 2 | 0.50 | 1.48 | ||
| Control | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 6 Hours After Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 0.15 | 0.48 | 0.101 |
| Intervention 2 | 0.39 | 1.18 | ||
| Control | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Comparison the frequency of vomiting occurrence among the three groups in various times (using Pearson Chi-Square Test. df = 2)
| Number of Measurements | Group | Vomiting | p-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Total | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |||
| In Recovery | Intervention 1 | 2 | 5 | 38 | 95 | 40 | 100 | p = 0.631 |
| Intervention 2 | 2 | 5 | 38 | 95 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 4 | 9.5 | 38 | 90.5 | 42 | 100 | ||
| Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 100 | 40 | 100 | p < 0.005 |
| Intervention 2 | 5 | 14.2 | 35 | 85.5 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100 | 42 | 100 | ||
| Two Hours After Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 100 | 40 | 100 | p < 0.04 |
| Intervention 2 | 3 | 7.5 | 37 | 92.5 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100 | 42 | 100 | ||
| 6 Hours After Entering The Unit | Intervention 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 39 | 97.5 | 40 | 100 | p > 0.08 |
| Intervention 2 | 5 | 14.2 | 35 | 85.8 | 40 | 100 | ||
| Control | 1 | 2.3 | 41 | 97.7 | 42 | 100 | ||
| Total | 122 | 100 | ||||||