AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of direct catheter-based thrombectomy (d-CBT, without thrombolysis) and the feasibility and safety of d-CBT performed in an interventional cardiology centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre, prospective observational registry based on the pre-specified protocol included three months of follow-up. The decision to perform acute stroke intervention was made by a neurologist based on the clinical and imaging findings. Inclusion criteria were moderate-to-severe acute ischaemic stroke (NIHSS ≥6), <6 hours from symptom onset, no large ischaemia on the admission CT scan and CT evidence for an occluded large artery. The primary outcome was functional neurologic recovery (mRS 0-2) at three months. Key secondary outcomes were the angiographic recanalisation rate and symptomatic intracranial bleeding. A total of 115 consecutive patients (mean age 66 years) were enrolled during a period of four years: 84 patients underwent d-CBT and 31 patients bridging thrombolysis with immediate catheter intervention (TL-CBT). The annual number of procedures increased from 13 (initial 12 months) to 41 (last 12 months). Angiographic success (TICI flow 2b-3) was 69% after d-CBT and 81% after TL-CBT. It was higher in isolated occlusions of the middle cerebral artery (MCA, 74% and 100%) or of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA, 80% and 100%), while it was lower in combined ICA+MCA occlusions (63% and 70%) and in basilar or vertebral occlusions (57% and 50%). Neurologic recovery (mRS ≤2 after 90 days) was achieved in 40% of patients. It was higher (43%) in anterior circulation strokes than in posterior circulation strokes (25%). Direct CBT led to neurologic recovery in 36%, while in TL-CBT this was 52%. Best clinical outcomes (51% and 71% neurologic recovery rates) were achieved among patients with isolated MCA occlusion. Any symptomatic intracranial bleeding was present in 3.6% (d-CBT) and 6.5% (TL-CBT). Vessel perforation or major dissection occurred in 5.2% overall, and distal embolisation to other territory in 3.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Direct catheter-based thrombectomy may be considered in patients with contraindications for thrombolysis or in patients with very short CT-groin puncture times. A randomised trial is needed to evaluate better the role of direct catheter-based thrombectomy. Acute stroke interventions performed in close cooperation among cardiologists, neurologists and radiologists are feasible and safe.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of direct catheter-based thrombectomy (d-CBT, without thrombolysis) and the feasibility and safety of d-CBT performed in an interventional cardiology centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre, prospective observational registry based on the pre-specified protocol included three months of follow-up. The decision to perform acute stroke intervention was made by a neurologist based on the clinical and imaging findings. Inclusion criteria were moderate-to-severe acute ischaemic stroke (NIHSS ≥6), <6 hours from symptom onset, no large ischaemia on the admission CT scan and CT evidence for an occluded large artery. The primary outcome was functional neurologic recovery (mRS 0-2) at three months. Key secondary outcomes were the angiographic recanalisation rate and symptomatic intracranial bleeding. A total of 115 consecutive patients (mean age 66 years) were enrolled during a period of four years: 84 patients underwent d-CBT and 31 patients bridging thrombolysis with immediate catheter intervention (TL-CBT). The annual number of procedures increased from 13 (initial 12 months) to 41 (last 12 months). Angiographic success (TICI flow 2b-3) was 69% after d-CBT and 81% after TL-CBT. It was higher in isolated occlusions of the middle cerebral artery (MCA, 74% and 100%) or of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA, 80% and 100%), while it was lower in combined ICA+MCA occlusions (63% and 70%) and in basilar or vertebral occlusions (57% and 50%). Neurologic recovery (mRS ≤2 after 90 days) was achieved in 40% of patients. It was higher (43%) in anterior circulation strokes than in posterior circulation strokes (25%). Direct CBT led to neurologic recovery in 36%, while in TL-CBT this was 52%. Best clinical outcomes (51% and 71% neurologic recovery rates) were achieved among patients with isolated MCA occlusion. Any symptomatic intracranial bleeding was present in 3.6% (d-CBT) and 6.5% (TL-CBT). Vessel perforation or major dissection occurred in 5.2% overall, and distal embolisation to other territory in 3.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Direct catheter-based thrombectomy may be considered in patients with contraindications for thrombolysis or in patients with very short CT-groin puncture times. A randomised trial is needed to evaluate better the role of direct catheter-based thrombectomy. Acute stroke interventions performed in close cooperation among cardiologists, neurologists and radiologists are feasible and safe.