Literature DB >> 28242481

Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.

Yasushi Tsujimoto1, Hiraku Tsujimoto2, Yuki Kataoka1, Miho Kimachi1, Sayaka Shimizu1, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue1, Shingo Fukuma1, Yosuke Yamamoto3, Shunichi Fukuhara1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the registration of systematic review (SR) protocols and examine whether or not registration reduced the outcome reporting bias in high-impact journals. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We searched MEDLINE via PubMed to identify SRs of randomized controlled trials of interventions. We included SRs published between August 2009 and June 2015 in the 10 general and internal medicinal journals with the highest impact factors in 2013. We examined the proportion of SR protocol registration and investigated the relationship between registration and outcome reporting bias using multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among the 284 included reviews, 60 (21%) protocols were registered. The proportion of registration increased from 5.6% in 2009 to 27% in 2015 (P for trend <0.001). Protocol registration was not associated with outcome reporting bias (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-1.86). The association between Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) adherence and protocol registration was not statistically significant (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.59-2.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Six years after the launch of the PRISMA statement, the proportion of protocol registration in high-impact journals has increased some but remains low. The present study found no evidence suggesting that protocol registration reduced outcome reporting bias.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Meta-Analysis; Outcome reporting bias; PRISMA statement; Protocol registration; Systematic review; The PROSPERO registry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242481     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  14 in total

1.  Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Robba; Gregorio Santori; Marek Czosnyka; Francesco Corradi; Nicola Bragazzi; Llewellyn Padayachy; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Hiraku Tsujimoto; Yasushi Tsujimoto; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-06

Review 3.  Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-19

4.  Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wilson W S Tam; Kenneth K H Lo; Parames Khalechelvam; Joey Seah; Shawn Y S Goh
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Murad; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2017-07-12

6.  Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.

Authors:  Juan Ruano; Francisco Gómez-García; Jesús Gay-Mimbrera; Macarena Aguilar-Luque; José Luis Fernández-Rueda; Jesús Fernández-Chaichio; Patricia Alcalde-Mellado; Pedro J Carmona-Fernandez; Juan Luis Sanz-Cabanillas; Isabel Viguera-Guerra; Francisco Franco-García; Manuel Cárdenas-Aranzana; José Luis Hernández Romero; Marcelino Gonzalez-Padilla; Beatriz Isla-Tejera; Antonio Velez Garcia-Nieto
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-09

7.  Prognostic factors for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kamiya; Ogee Mer Panlaqui
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.

Authors:  Yasushi Tsujimoto; Yusuke Tsutsumi; Yuki Kataoka; Hiraku Tsujimoto; Yosuke Yamamoto; Davide Papola; Gordon H Guyatt; Shunichi Fukuhara; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers.

Authors:  Gehad Mohamed Tawfik; Hoang Thi Nam Giang; Sherief Ghozy; Ahmed M Altibi; Hend Kandil; Huu-Hoai Le; Peter Samuel Eid; Ibrahim Radwan; Omar Mohamed Makram; Tong Thi Thu Hien; Mahmoud Sherif; As-Saba Hossain; Tai Luu Lam Thang; Livia Puljak; Hosni Salem; Tarek Numair; Kazuhiko Moji; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cells for treating patients with knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis toward the establishment of effective regenerative rehabilitation.

Authors:  Hirotaka Iijima; Takuya Isho; Hiroshi Kuroki; Masaki Takahashi; Tomoki Aoyama
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2018-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.