Literature DB >> 28242058

Clostridium difficile Infection Among US Emergency Department Patients With Diarrhea and No Vomiting.

Fredrick M Abrahamian1, David A Talan2, Anusha Krishnadasan3, Diane M Citron4, Ashley L Paulick5, Lydia J Anderson5, Ellie J C Goldstein6, Gregory J Moran2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection has increased and has been observed among persons from the community who have not been exposed to antibiotics or health care settings. Our aims are to determine prevalence of C difficile infection among emergency department (ED) patients with diarrhea and the prevalence among patients without traditional risk factors.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients aged 2 years or older with diarrhea (≥3 episodes/24 hours) and no vomiting in 10 US EDs (2010 to 2013). We confirmed C difficile infection by positive stool culture result and toxin assay. C difficile infection risk factors were antibiotic use or overnight health care stay in the previous 3 months or previous C difficile infection. We typed strains with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
RESULTS: Of 422 participants, median age was 46 years (range 2 to 94 years), with median illness duration of 3.0 days and 43.4% having greater than or equal to 10 episodes of diarrhea during the previous 24 hours. At least one risk factor for C difficile infection was present in 40.8% of participants; 25.9% were receiving antibiotics, 26.9% had health care stay within the previous 3 months, and 3.3% had previous C difficile infection. Forty-three participants (10.2%) had C difficile infection; among these, 24 (55.8%) received antibiotics and 19 (44.2%) had health care exposure; 17 of 43 (39.5%) lacked any risk factor. Among participants without risk factors, C difficile infection prevalence was 6.9%. The most commonly identified North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (NAP) strains were NAP type 1 (23.3%) and NAP type 4 (16.3%).
CONCLUSION: Among mostly adults presenting to US EDs with diarrhea and no vomiting, C difficile infection accounted for approximately 10%. More than one third of patients with C difficile infection lacked traditional risk factors for the disease. Among participants without traditional risk factors, prevalence of C difficile infection was approximately 7%.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242058     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  4 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Four Common Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  Si Xuan; Kenneth M Zangwill; Weiyi Ni; Junjie Ma; Joel W Hay
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Competing Treatment Strategies for Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Phuc Le; Van T Nghiem; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Abhishek Deshpande
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  EMERGEncy ID NET: Review of a 20-Year Multisite Emergency Department Emerging Infections Research Network.

Authors:  Scott Santibanez; Leah S Fischer; Anusha Krishnadasan; Bethany Sederdahl; Toby Merlin; Gregory J Moran; David A Talan
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 4.423

4.  Unique Clindamycin-Resistant Clostridioides difficile Strain Related to Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Epidemic BI/RT027 Strain.

Authors:  Andrew M Skinner; Laurica Petrella; Farida Siddiqui; Susan P Sambol; Christopher A Gulvik; Dale N Gerding; Curtis J Donskey; Stuart Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.883

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.