| Literature DB >> 28241810 |
Lin Ge1,2, Anna Chen1,2, Jianjun Pei1,2, Linguo Zhao3,4, Xianying Fang1,2, Gang Ding5, Zhenzhong Wang5, Wei Xiao6, Feng Tang7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thermally stable α-L-rhamnosidase with cleaving terminal α-L-rhamnose activity has great potential in industrial application. Therefore, it is necessary to find a proper method to improve the thermal stability of α-L-rhamnosidase.Entities:
Keywords: Enzymatic conversion; Sorbitol; Thermostability; α-L-Rhamnosidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28241810 PMCID: PMC5327507 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-017-0342-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Fig. 1Effects of sorbitol, at different concentrations, on the thermostability of α-L-rhamnosidase at 70 °C. The level of thermostability before each incubation was defined as 100%. Each value represents the mean of three independent measurements
Fig. 2a Thermal stability profile of α-L-rhamnosidase with and without 2.0 M of sorbitol incubated at different temperatures ranging from 60 °C to 85 °C for 10 min. b The kinetics of thermal inactivation of α-L-rhamnosidase without sorbitol incubated at different temperatures ranging from 65 to 75 °C for several time intervals. c The kinetics of thermal inactivation of α-L-rhamnosidase with sorbitol incubated at different temperatures ranging from 65 to 75 °C for several time intervals. The level of thermostability before each incubation was defined as 100%. Each value represents the mean of three independent measurements
Half-life and activation free energy (ΔG≠) of α-L-rhamnosidase with and without 2.0 M of sorbitol
| Temperature (°C) | Half-life (min) | ΔG≠ (kJ/mol) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controla, b | 2.0 M Sorbitola, b | Controla, b | 2.0 M Sorbitola, b | |
| 65 | 127.9 ± 1 | 580.3 ± 4 | 86.3 ± 0.4 | 90.5 ± 0.6 |
| 70 | 18.2 ± 0.2 | 313.7 ± 2 | 82.0 ± 0.3 | 90.2 ± 0.8 |
| 75 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 54.6 ± 0.4 | 76.5 ± 0.5 | 86.5 ± 0.6 |
aControl, α-L-rhamnosidase without 2.0 M sorbitol
bValues are the means ± SD (n = 3)
Kinetic parameters of α-L-rhamnosidase with and without sorbitol
| Sample | Specific activityA
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No additives | 451.5 ± 12.5 | 0.481 ± 0.01 | 407.6 ± 11.6 | 8.5 × 103 |
| 0.6 M Sorbitol | 414.5 ± 11.6 | 0.493 ± 0.02 | 379.2 ± 10.6 | 7.7 × 103 |
| 1.0 M Sorbitol | 354.4 ± 10.4 | 0.542 ± 0.02 | 362.5 ± 10.7 | 6.7 × 103 |
AValues are the means ± SD (n = 3)
Surface hydrophobicity values of α-L-rhamnosidase with and without sorbitol before and after incubation
| Samples | H0 valuesc |
|---|---|
| Controla | 41483 ± 179.0 |
| No additivesb | 289507 ± 112.1 |
| 0.6 M Sorbitolb | 368005 ± 110.5 |
| 1.0 M Sorbitolb | 357237 ± 238.1 |
aControl, α-L-Rhamnosidase before heating
bSamples after heating at 70 °C for 4 h
cValues are the means ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 3The intrinsic fluorescence spectra of α-L-rhamnosidase. a Without sorbitol before and after incubation at 70°C for 4 h. b Incubated at 70°C for 4 h with different concentrations of sorbitol in 10 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.5. All spectra were corrected for the fluorescence of a protein-free sample. Each value represents the mean of three independent measurements
Fig. 4Far-UV CD spectra of α-L-rhamnosidase. a Without sorbitol before and after incubation at 70 °C for 4 h. b Incubated at 70 °C for 4 h with different concentrations of sorbitol in 10 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.5. All spectra were corrected for the signal generated by a protein-free sample
Contents of estimated secondary structures of α-L-rhamnosidase with and without sorbitol before and after incubation
| Samples | α-Helix | β-Sheet | Turn | Random coil |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controla | 30 | 28.88 | 20.1 | 21.12 |
| No additivesb | 22 | 22.48 | 23.26 | 32.27 |
| 0.6 M Sorbitolb | 27.17 | 29.6 | 21.21 | 22.12 |
| 1.0 M Sorbitolb | 27.11 | 31.28 | 19.56 | 22.05 |
aControl, α-L-Rhamnosidase before heating
bSamples after heating at 70 °C for 4 h
Fig. 5Effect of sorbitol on the enzymatic conversion of rutin to isoquercitrin. a Incubated at 70 °C for 4 h with different concentration of sorbitol in disodium hydrogen phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 6.5, 8 mM of rutin, and 0.1 U/mL of α-L-rhamnosidase; (b) Incubated at 70 °C for 4 h with 1.5 M of sorbitol in disodium hydrogen phosphate-citrate buffer at pH range from 4.5 to 6.5, 8 mM of rutin, and 0.1 U/mL of α-L-rhamnosidase; (c) Incubated at 70 °C for 4 h with different concentration of rutin in disodium hydrogen phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 5.5, 1.5 M of sorbitol, and 0.1 U/mL of α-L-rhamnosidase; (d) Incubated at 70 °C for up to 12 h with different enzyme concentration without 1.5 M sorbitol in disodium hydrogen phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 5.5, 16 mM of rutin. e Incubated at 70 °C for up to 12 h with different enzyme concentration with 1.5 M sorbitol in disodium hydrogen phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 5.5, 16 mM of rutin. Each value represents the mean of three independent measurements