| Literature DB >> 28241503 |
Mingzhang Luo1, Weijie Li2,3, Bo Wang4, Qingqing Fu5, Gangbing Song6,7.
Abstract
Rock bolts, as a type of reinforcing element, are widely adopted in underground excavations and civil engineering structures. Given the importance of rock bolts, the research outlined in this paper attempts to develop a portable non-destructive evaluation method for assessing the length of installed rock bolts for inspection purposes. Traditionally, piezoelectric elements or hammer impacts were used to perform non-destructive evaluation of rock bolts. However, such methods suffered from many major issues, such as the weak energy generated and the requirement for permanent installation for piezoelectric elements, and the inconsistency of wave generation for hammer impact. In this paper, we proposed a portable device for the non-destructive evaluation of rock bolt conditions based on a giant magnetostrictive (GMS) actuator. The GMS actuator generates enough energy to ensure multiple reflections of the stress waves along the rock bolt and a lead zirconate titantate (PZT) sensor is used to detect the reflected waves. A new integrated procedure that involves correlation analysis, wavelet denoising, and Hilbert transform was proposed to process the multiple reflection signals to determine the length of an installed rock bolt. The experimental results from a lab test and field tests showed that, by analyzing the instant phase of the periodic reflections of the stress wave generated by the GMS transducer, the length of an embedded rock bolt can be accurately determined.Entities:
Keywords: determination of installed rock bolt length; giant magnetostrictive actuator; instant phases; non-destructive evaluation; rock bolt monitoring; stress wave reflection
Year: 2017 PMID: 28241503 PMCID: PMC5375730 DOI: 10.3390/s17030444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Measurement system setup.
Figure 2Illustration and photograph of the GMS transducer: (a) components of the GMS transducer; and (b) photo of the GMS transducer.
Figure 3The pulse driving circuit for the GMS transducer.
Figure 4Diagram of the rock bolt specimen.
Figure 5Instrumentation and experimental setup.
Figure 6Original waveforms of the reflected stress wave.
Figure 7Superimposed waveforms.
Figure 8The denoised waveform by wavelet denoising algorithm (top) and the periodic pattern of the instant phase (bottom).
The results for five of the chosen rock bolts in a highway tunnel in Wuqi County.
| Rock Bolt Number | Measured Length (m) | Actual Length (m) | Error (%) | Average Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.01 | 2.00 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| 2 | 3.05 | 3.10 | 1.6 | |
| 3 | 3.16 | 3.15 | 0.3 | |
| 4 | 2.82 | 2.80 | 0.7 | |
| 5 | 2.92 | 2.95 | 1.0 |
Figure 9Field tests at Site 1.
Figure 10Original waveforms of the reflected stress wave at Site 1.
Figure 11Superimposed waveforms at Site 1.
Figure 12The denoised waveform by wavelet denoising algorithm (top) and the periodic pattern of the instant phase (bottom) at Site 1.
The results for five of the chosen rock bolts at Yangqu Hydropower Station.
| Rock Bolt Number | Measured Length (m) | Actual Length (m) | Error (%) | Average Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.02 | 2.00 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2 | 1.81 | 1.80 | 0.6 | |
| 3 | 2.77 | 2.80 | 1.0 | |
| 4 | 3.76 | 3.80 | 0.7 | |
| 5 | 3.15 | 3.10 | 1.6 |
Figure 13Field tests at Site 2.
Figure 14Original waveforms of the reflected stress wave at Site 2.
Figure 15Superimposed waveforms at Site 2.
Figure 16The denoised waveform by wavelet denoising algorithm (top) and the periodic pattern of the instant phase (bottom) at Site 2.