| Literature DB >> 28241409 |
Masanori Takehara1, Naoki Muguruma1, Shinji Kitamura1, Tetsuo Kimura1, Koichi Okamoto1, Hiroshi Miyamoto1, Yoshimi Bando2, Tetsuji Takayama1.
Abstract
The rectal tonsil is a rare polypoid lesion exclusively found in the rectum and is considered a reactive proliferation of the lymphoid tissue. Although this lesion is benign, we recommend that it should be differentiated from carcinoid or polypoid type of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas, based on gross findings. In this case report, we describe a case of rectal lesions with a unique appearance in a 41-year-old man. Colonoscopy revealed two 5-mm-sized nodules located opposite from each other on the left and right sides of the lower rectum. Endoscopic mucosal resection was conducted. Histopathologically, both lesions were mainly located in the submucosa and consisted of prominent lymphoid follicles with germinal centers of various sizes. No immunoreactivity of Bcl-2 was seen in the germinal centers. Immunohistochemical staining for kappa and lambda light chains revealed a polyclonal pattern. Therefore, these lesions were diagnosed as rectal tonsils.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic procedure; Histopathology; Lymphoid hyperplasia; Rectal neoplasia; Submucosal tumor
Year: 2017 PMID: 28241409 PMCID: PMC5642061 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2016.157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Endosc ISSN: 2234-2400
Fig. 1.Endoscopy revealed two red nodules (5 mm in size) located 15 mm from the anal verge.
Fig. 2.Narrow-band imaging with magnification revealed dilated branches of vessels on the mucosal surface. (A) Left lesion, (B) Right lesion. Endoscopic ultrasound showed well-demarcated small hypoechoic areas in the lamina propria. (C) Left lesion, (D) Right lesion.
Fig. 3.Histopathological findings of endoscopic mucosal resection specimen. (A) Low power view with hematoxylin and eosin staining (×20). Immunohistochemistry revealed that the cells were negative for (B) bcl-2 (×100) and (C) kappa (×200) and (D) lambda (×200) light chains showed a polyclonal pattern.
Summary of Reported Rectal Tonsil
| Study | Case | Sex (M/F) | Mean age (range) | Endoscopic appearance ( | Size (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kojima et al. (2005) [ | 3 | 0/3 | 59 (46-66) | Solitary sessile (1), Multiple sessile (2) | 5-6 |
| Kojima et al. (2007) [ | 2 | 0/2 | 61 (50-71) | Solitary sessile (2) | 5-6 |
| Farris et al. (2008) [ | 11 | 6/5 | 49 (1-62) | Polyp (8), Nodules (2), Mass (1) | 3-12 |
| Eire et al. (2011) [ | 1 | 0/1 | 4 | Nodular | 30 |
| Homan et al. (2012) [ | 1 | 0/1 | 6 | Sessile | - |
| Grube-Pagola et al. (2012) [ | 1 | 1/0 | 58 | Nodular | 40×30×30 |
| Hong et al. (2015) [ | 1 | 0/1 | 59 | Solitary sessile | 5 |
| Our case | 1 | 1/0 | 41 | Nodules | 5 |