Elysia Alvarez1, Theresa Keegan2, Emily E Johnston1, Robert Haile3, Lee Sanders4, Olga Saynina5, Lisa J Chamberlain4. 1. Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 2. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California. 3. Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 4. Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 5. The Center for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) ages 15 to 39 years with cancer continue to experience disparate survival outcomes compared with their younger and older counterparts. This may be caused in part by differential access to specialized cancer centers (SCCs), because treatment at SCCs has been associated with improved overall survival. The authors examined social and clinical factors associated with AYA use of SCCs (defined as Children's Oncology Group-designated or National Cancer Institute-designated centers). METHODS: A retrospective, population-based analysis was performed on all hospital admissions of AYA oncology patients in California during 1991 through 2014 (n = 127,250) using the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the contribution of social and clinical factors on always receiving care from an SCC (vs sometimes or never). Results are presented as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Over the past 20 years, the percentage of patients always receiving inpatient care at an SCC increased over time (from 27% in 1991 to 43% in 2014). In multivariable regression analyses, AYA patients were less likely to always receive care from an SCC if they had public insurance (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.62-0.66), were uninsured (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46-0.56), were Hispanic (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.91), lived > 5 miles from an SCC, or had a diagnosis other than leukemia and central nervous system tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving care at an SCC was influenced by insurance, race/ethnicity, geography, and tumor type. Identifying the barriers associated with decreased SCC use is an important first step toward improving outcomes in AYA oncology patients. Cancer 2017;123:2516-23.
BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) ages 15 to 39 years with cancer continue to experience disparate survival outcomes compared with their younger and older counterparts. This may be caused in part by differential access to specialized cancer centers (SCCs), because treatment at SCCs has been associated with improved overall survival. The authors examined social and clinical factors associated with AYA use of SCCs (defined as Children's Oncology Group-designated or National Cancer Institute-designated centers). METHODS: A retrospective, population-based analysis was performed on all hospital admissions of AYA oncology patients in California during 1991 through 2014 (n = 127,250) using the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the contribution of social and clinical factors on always receiving care from an SCC (vs sometimes or never). Results are presented as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Over the past 20 years, the percentage of patients always receiving inpatient care at an SCC increased over time (from 27% in 1991 to 43% in 2014). In multivariable regression analyses, AYA patients were less likely to always receive care from an SCC if they had public insurance (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.62-0.66), were uninsured (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46-0.56), were Hispanic (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.91), lived > 5 miles from an SCC, or had a diagnosis other than leukemia and central nervous system tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving care at an SCC was influenced by insurance, race/ethnicity, geography, and tumor type. Identifying the barriers associated with decreased SCC use is an important first step toward improving outcomes in AYA oncology patients. Cancer 2017;123:2516-23.
Authors: Elysia M Alvarez; Marcio Malogolowkin; Jeffrey S Hoch; Qian Li; Ann Brunson; Brad H Pollock; Lori Muffly; Ted Wun; Theresa H M Keegan Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-06-11
Authors: Pooja Rao; Joel E Segel; Lisa M McGregor; Eugene J Lengerich; Joseph J Drabick; Barbara Miller Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Emily E Johnston; Lori Muffly; Elysia Alvarez; Olga Saynina; Lee M Sanders; Smita Bhatia; Lisa J Chamberlain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kekoa Taparra; Alec Fitzsimmons; Susan Frankki; Andrea De Wall; Fumiko Chino; Antoinette Peters Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-09-26 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Thomas J Semrad; Qian Li; Melanie Goldfarb; Alison Semrad; Michael Campbell; D Gregory Farwell; Theresa H M Keegan Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 1.757
Authors: Andrew J Bishop; J Andrew Livingston; Matt S Ning; Isaac D Valdez; Cody A Wages; Mary Fran McAleer; Arnold C Paulino; David R Grosshans; Kristina D Woodhouse; Randa Tao; Michael E Roth; G Brandon Gunn; Susan L McGovern Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Alicia A Gingrich; Candice A M Sauder; Melanie Goldfarb; Qian Li; Ted Wun; Theresa H M Keegan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 4.254