| Literature DB >> 28241051 |
Garry Kong, David Alais, Erik Van der Burg.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160914.].Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28241051 PMCID: PMC5328400 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 6Correlations from Experiment 1 between distractor type and RTs, averaged across participants.
Error bars represent ±1 within-subjects standard error of measurement [23]. * Indicates that the correlation is statistically significant at the α = .05 level after Bonferroni correction. + Indicates that the correlation is only statistically significant without Bonferroni correction.
Fig 8Data from Experiment 2 showing correct mean RTs as a function of the display composition.
Error bars represent ±1 within-subjects standard error of measurement [23]. The x-axis indicates which of the red distractors were systematically increased in that condition. For example, small ±12.5° indicates that 20% of the display was fixed as small red 12.5° from horizontal and small red -12.5° from horizontal lines.