Literature DB >> 28240938

Cultural variation in communal versus exchange norms: Implications for social support.

Joan G Miller1, Hiroko Akiyama2, Shagufa Kapadia3.   

Abstract

Whereas an interdependent cultural view of self has been linked to communal norms and to socially supportive behavior, its relationship to social support has been called into question in research suggesting that discomfort in social support is associated with an interdependent cultural view of self (e.g., Taylor et al., 2004). These contrasting claims were addressed in 2 studies conducted among Japanese, Indian, and American adults. Assessing everyday social support, Study 1 showed that Japanese and Americans rely on exchange norms more frequently than Indians among friends, whereas American rely on exchange norms more frequently than Indians and Japanese among siblings. Assessing responses to vignettes, Study 2 demonstrated that Japanese and Americans rely more frequently on exchange norms than Indians, with greatest relational concerns and most negative outlooks on social support observed among Japanese, less among Americans, and least among Indians. Results further indicated that relational concerns mediated the link between exchange norms and negative social support outlooks. Supporting past claims that relational concerns explain cultural variation in discomfort in social support (e.g., Kim, Sherman, & Taylor, 2008), the findings underscore the need to take into account as well the role of exchange norms in explaining such discomfort. The findings also highlight the existence of culturally variable approaches to exchange and call into question claims that discomfort in social support can be explained in terms of the global concept of an interdependent cultural view of self. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28240938     DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  6 in total

1.  Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being.

Authors:  Yuthika U Girme; Michael R Maniaci; Harry T Reis; James K McNulty; Cheryl L Carmichael; Shelly L Gable; Levi R Baker; Nickola C Overall
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2018-09-13

2.  Ingroup vigilance in collectivistic cultures.

Authors:  Shi S Liu; Michael W Morris; Thomas Talhelm; Qian Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Prosocial correlates of transformative experiences at secular multi-day mass gatherings.

Authors:  Daniel A Yudkin; Annayah M B Prosser; S Megan Heller; Kateri McRae; Aleksandr Chakroff; M J Crockett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Cultural differences in social support seeking: The mediating role of empathic concern.

Authors:  Shaofeng Zheng; Takahiko Masuda; Masahiro Matsunaga; Yasuki Noguchi; Yohsuke Ohtsubo; Hidenori Yamasue; Keiko Ishii
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Genetic Structure and East-West Population Admixture in Northwest China Inferred From Genome-Wide Array Genotyping.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Jinwen Chen; Xiaomin Yang; Jingya Bai; Siwei Ouyang; Xiaodan Mo; Wangsheng Chen; Chuan-Chao Wang; Xiangjun Hai
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Will This Help Be Helpful? Giving Aid to Strangers in the United States and Japan.

Authors:  Yu Niiya; Caitlin Handron; Hazel Rose Markus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.