Lennart T Scharf1, Viktoria H Gessner1. 1. Chair of Inorganic Chemistry II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Abstract
The development and design of new ligand systems with special donor properties has been essential for crucial advances made in main-group-element and transition-metal chemistry over the years. This Forum Article focuses on metalated ylides as novel ligand systems. These anionic congeners of bisylides possess likewise two lone pairs of electrons at the central carbon atom and can thus function as X,L-type ligands with strong donor abilities. This article highlights recent efforts in the isolation and application of metalated ylides with a focus on work from this laboratory. We summarize structural and electronic properties and their use in organic synthesis as well as main-group-element and transition-metal chemistry.
The development and design of new ligand systems with special donor properties has been essential for crucial advances made in main-group-element and transition-metalchemistry over the years. This Forum Article focuses on metalated ylides as novel ligand systems. These anioniccongeners of bisylides possess likewise two lone pairs of electrons at the central carbon atom and can thus function as X,L-type ligands with strong donor abilities. This article highlights recent efforts in the isolation and application of metalated ylides with a focus on work from this laboratory. We summarize structural and electronic properties and their use in organic synthesis as well as main-group-element and transition-metalchemistry.
Amines and phosphines
are the textbook examples of Lewis bases as electron-pair donors and
ligands in main-group-element and transition-metalchemistry. The
early developments in organometallicchemistry and homogeneous catalysis
are strongly connected with advances made in the design of these ligand
systems. In contrast, carbon-centered Lewis bases have been less important.
This was historically due to the fact that carbon bases with a free
pair of electrons at carbon, e.g., carbenes or carbanions, are usually
highly sensitive and reactive compounds. Yet, with the remarkable
developments in carbenechemistry, these bases have found increasing
attention over the last decades. Like carbenes, ylides are overall
neutral compounds with a carbon-centered pair of electrons and thus
have potential as versatile Lewis bases in coordination and bond activation
chemistry. This has been proven by the revival of research interest
in bisylides, above all carbodiphosphoranes (CDPs), in the past years.Since the first synthesis of an ylide[1] and their use in Wittig-type reactions,[2] these compounds have been applied in a variety of important reactions,
e.g., for natural product synthesis. The most important class of ylides
are phosphorus ylides (P-ylides). Their electronic structure has mostly
been described by two canonical structures: ylene A and
ylide A′ (Figure A). However, computational studies have shown that
the contribution of the ylenic structure is minimal because it requires
(d–p)π interaction with d orbitals at phosphorus.[3] Recently, the canonical structure A″ with a donor–acceptor interaction between phosphorus and
carbon has found renewed interest.[4] It
classifies ylides as phosphane-stabilized carbenes. An analogous description
has also been used for bisylidiccompounds, particularly CDPs.[5] This leads to their description either as bisylides B′ or as a divalent carboncompound with carbon in
the formal oxidation state of zero (carbone B″) and donor–acceptor interactions between the phosphine and
central carbon atom (Figure B). The unique electronic structure of these compounds has
been studied in detail in recent years[6] but is still under debate.[7]
Figure 1
Comparison
between ylides (A) and bisylides (B).
Comparison
between ylides (A) and bisylides (B).The high electron density and availability of two lone pairs
at the central carbon atom of bisylides suggest new and unusual ligand
properties for CDPs and related bisylidiccompounds.[8] In the case of CDPs, recent studies have proven their unique
reactivity, which makes them highly attractive as carbon bases. For
example, hexaphenylcarbodiphosphorane was found to undergo adduct
formation with small molecules or ions such as CO2, BH3, or GeCl+[9] or can be
used as a ligand in transition-metalcomplexes[10] or in bond activation reactions.[11] Their chemistry has been summarized in recent review articles.[12] Likewise, bent allenes,[13] which have also been described as carbodicarbenes, feature similar
properties and can function as ligands with remarkable donor strengths.
The first studies on these rather peculiar carbon(0)compounds were
pioneered in particular by Bertrand and Fürstner, already demonstrating
their potential in transition-metalchemistry.[14] Later, the groups of Ong, Meek, and Stephan impressively
confirmed the utility of these ligands in transition-metal-catalyzed
reactions.[15] As such, high activities were
observed in several different catalytic transformations, such as in
hydrogenation and hydroamination reactions or in C–Ccoupling
reactions.Because of these impressive reports on the structure
and applicability of carbon-centered donor bases, our group has become
interested in the class of metalated ylidesC, the so-called
yldiides. They can be viewed as the anioniccongeners of bisylides,
formed by the replacement of one positively charged onium moiety (e.g.,
a phosphonium group) by a neutral substituent (Figure ).[16] Comparable
to bisylides, metalated ylides possess two pairs of electrons at the
central carbon atom and should thus potentially act as monoanionic
X,L-type σ- and π-donor ligands. In this Forum Article,
we highlight recent developments in the chemistry of metalated ylides.
We will particularly focus on isolated systems, their electronic structure,
and their donor properties.
Figure 2
Comparison between metalated ylides and bisylides.
Comparison between metalated ylides and bisylides.
Synthesis and Isolation of
Metalated Ylides
While ylidechemistry is now well-established,
only a very few reports have appeared on their metalated congeners.
Such yldiides are the anionic versions of bisylides, e.g., CDPs, where
one PR3+ moiety is replaced by a neutral substituent
(Figure ). Because
of the high negative charge at the carbon atom, they are assumed to
be highly nucleophilic species. The first synthesis of a metalated
ylide [Ph3P–C(Li)–C3H7] was proposed by Schlosser and co-workers using pentaphenylphosphane
and an excess of butyllithium.[17] However,
no isolation or reactivity studies were reported at that time. Later
studies by Corey and Kang in the 1980s reported an enhanced reactivity
of yldiides in Wittig reactions with sterically hindered ketones.[18] Here, the metalated ylide was prepared by direct
deprotonation of the corresponding ylide at low temperatures, although
again no isolation was accomplished because of the high nucleophilicity
of the compounds. The first isolation and characterization of an yldiide
was described by Bestmann and Schmidt in 1987 by means of the cyanido-functionalized
compound 1 (Scheme ).[19]1 was
prepared by a classical deprotonation reaction of the corresponding
ylide 1-H with sodium hexamethyldisilazide (NaHMDS).
Although no structure elucidation was reported, they concluded on
the basis of IR spectroscopic studies that resonance structure 1′ with charge stabilization by the CN moiety significantly
contributes to the electronic distribution in 1. Yet,
because of the observed reactivity, a structure with two pairs of
electrons at the central carbon atom (1) was also suggested.
Only recently, the contribution of form 1″ with
a dative bond between phosphorus and carbon was considered, and thus
properties analogous to those of bisylides were proposed (vide infra).[12a]
Scheme 1
Preparation of Yldiide 1 and
Resonance Structures of 1
Until today, only three yldiides have been isolated and
also structurally characterized: (i) the silyl-substituted yldiide 2 synthesized by Bertrand et al.,[20] phosphoranylidene ylides 3a and 3b by
Niecke et al.[21] (Figure ), and (iii) the sulfonyl-substituted compound 4 reported by our group (Figure ).[22] Interestingly,
the metalated ylide 2 was not prepared via a classical
deprotonation reaction analogous to 1 but via a 1,2-carbometalation
reaction of carbene 5 with butyllithium. The structure
of the silyl-substituted compound (Figure , left) featured a planar geometry around
the ylidiccarbon atom with short P–C [1.636(11) Å] and
Si–C [1.755(10) Å] distances. The latter reflects the
stabilizing effect of the negative charge by the silyl group, while
the short P–C bond can be explained by increased Coulombic
interactions in the Pδ+–Cδ− linkage or strong σ donation from and π-back-bonding
to the phosphine ligand (vide infra). The lithium atom in 2 is coordinated by the ylidiccarbon atom as well as two tetrahydrofuran
molecules. An analogous coordination mode was found in the structure
of phosphoranylidene ylides 3a and 3b. Likewise,
short P–C bonds of 1.632(5) and 1.624(5) Å, respectively,
were observed in 3a and 3b, which are comparable
to 2.
Figure 3
Isolated metalated ylides 2 and 3 (left) and molecular structure of 2 (right).
Figure 4
Molecular structures of 4-Na and 4-K·18-crown-6.
Isolated metalated ylides 2 and 3 (left) and molecular structure of 2 (right).Molecular structures of 4-Na and 4-K·18-crown-6.In contrast to 2 and 3, the sulfonyl-substituted
yldiide 4 was the first example of a metalated ylide,
which is readily available also in a multigram scale by a straightforward
double deprotonation sequence from the corresponding phosphoniumsalt 1-H (Scheme ). Depending on the base used in the last
step, the lithium, sodium, or potassiumcompounds are accessible;
the latter two were also characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure ).
The molecular structure of the monomericcrown-ether-complexed potassiumsalt of 4 showed only a weak C–K interaction and
a bent P–C–S moiety with short P–C [1.646(2)
Å] and C–S [1.626(2) Å] bonds. The structure of the
sodiumcompound is somewhat more complex but showed similar coordination
modes and bond lengths compared to its potassiumcongener. Valuable
insight into the electronics of the compound is given by a comparison
of the structural parameters of 4-M with its protonated
precursors, ylide 4-H and phosphoniumsalt 4-H. Upon each deprotonation step, the P–C–S
linkage experiences an increasing contraction. For example, the C–S
bond shortens from 1.809(3) Å in 4-H to 1.626(2) Å in 4. This was explained by
Coulombic interactions within the Pδ+–Cδ−–Sδ+ moiety, while negative
hyperconjugation effects lead to elongated P–R and S–R
bonds to the β substituents. The widening of the P–C–S
angle is well in line with a change in the hybridization of the ylidiccarbon atom from sp3 to sp2.
Scheme 2
Preparation of Yldiide 4
Electronic
Structure of Metalated Ylides
The bonding situation in CDPs
has continuously been the subject of discussions. In general, it has
been described in three different ways (Figure ). Thereby, the cumulene structure B′ can be neglected because of the bent structure confirmed
by X-ray diffraction analysis[23] and the
unfavorable energeticsituation of the d orbitals of the phosphorus
atom, as shown by computational studies.[24] Additionally, their reactivity (e.g., their protonation energies
compared to carbenes[6c]), their behavior
in transition-metalcomplexes,[25] and their
highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) and HOMOs–1[6b] clearly prove the presence of two lone pairs
at the central carbon atom. Thereby, one of these lone pairs is of
σ symmetry and the other one of π symmetry, so that CDPscan act as σ- and π-donor ligands.
Figure 5
Canonical structures
of CDPs.
Canonical structures
of CDPs.Thus, for a long time, the bisylidic
structure B with ylidic electron-sharing bonds between
the phosphorus and carbon atoms had been considered to be the best
description of the electronic structure. However, a few years ago,
Frenking and co-workers showed by means of energy decomposition analysis
(EDA) that the carbone structure B″ has a significant
contribution to the bonding situation.[6,7] Similar to
the bonding situation in transition-metalcomplexes, the two phosphine
ligands form dative interactions to stabilize the carbon(0)center
by σ donation. Depending on the substituents, also π back-donation
from the p orbital (π lone pair) of the central carbon into,
e.g., low-lying σ* orbitals, plays a significant role. Nevertheless,
σ donation usually exceeds π back-donation, thus explaining
the typically high negative partial charge at the central carbon atom.
Overall, the concept of a dative bonding situation in B″ applied the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model often used
for the bonding situation in transition-metalcomplexes to organic[26] and main-group-element compounds[27] and allowed an explanation of the properties
of similar compounds, such as the large bonding angle in carbon suboxide,
in which CO serves as stronger π acceptor compared to PPh3.[6d]While first computational
studies on bisylides only considered symmetrical bonding situations,
recent studies also demonstrated that the unsymmetrical bonding situation
[R3P+–C–←PR3] with one ylidic and one dative bond has to be considered
for the description of the electronic structure of B.[28] Thus, the carbone structure B″ and the unsymmetrical structure B‴ are, from
an EDA perspective, the best canonical structures to describe the
bonding situation in CDPs. Other unsymmetrical bonding situations
[e.g., R3P+–C=PR3]
were found to be negligible.Recently, our group focused on
the bonding situation in metalated ylides particularly in comparison
with related bisylidiccompounds. Both the influence of the substituent
L (anion-stabilization vs charge delocalization) and the total charge
of the molecule (metalated ylide vs bisylide) on the bonding situation
were studied (Figure ). Thereby, also unsymmetrical bonding situations, such as B‴ in Figure , were considered.[28]
Figure 6
Metalated ylides
and bisylides.
Metalated ylides
and bisylides.Comparable to bisylides,
the two highest canonical molecular orbitals, HOMO and HOMO–1
of the metalated ylides, are mainly localized at the central carbon
atom and are indicative for two lone-pair orbitals, one of σ
symmetry and one of π symmetry. This clearly confirms their
potential as σ- and π-donor ligands. Figure exemplarily depicts these
orbitals for the sulfonyl system 6. The systems with
carbon-based ligands 8, 9, and 13, however, also showed a significant contribution of delocalization
of the electron density: for the imidazole 8 and imidazolate 9 moieties, the HOMO is delocalized over the ligands, while
for the cyanido moiety in 13, both the HOMO and HOMO–1
are delocalized. This suggests a significant π-acceptor strength
of these substituents that has not been observed for the phosphorus
and silyl and sulfonyl ligands.
Figure 7
HOMO (left) and HOMO–1 (right)
for 6.
HOMO (left) and HOMO–1 (right)
for 6.Natural bond orbital
analysis was found to be ambiguous in providing clear insight into
the bonding situation because of the fact that it is impossible to
distinguish between π-back-bonding, negative hyperconjugation
and electron-sharing double bonds as well as between dative and ylidic
electron-sharing bonds by this method. Furthermore, several, mostly
unsymmetrical, resonance structures showed equally high residual densities,
indicating that different bonding situations are suitable for the
description of the electron distribution within the molecule. However,
an interesting observation concerned the partial charge at the ylidiccarbon atom. A comparison of the neutral and anioniccompound pairs
showed that the negative charge of the central carbon atom does not
change significantly upon the introduction of a negative charge at
the periphery of the ligand. For example, the sulfonyl systems 6 and 7 and the isoelectroniccompound pair with
L=CN–/CO showed only a small or even no increase
in the negative charge despite the fact that the overall molecular
charge becomes negative. Instead, the partial charge at the central
carbon atom allowed an estimation of the π-acceptor strength
of the ligand. For the carbon-based ligands, which also showed π
delocalization in HOMO and HOMO–1 (see above), the charge at
the central carbon is lower (usually around −1.0 e) than that
for the weaker π acceptors (>−1.1 e). The charge increases
further with higher σ-donor strength (for example, a trimethylsilyl
moiety, −1.5 e). Thus, the donor strength of the central carbon
atom does not depend on the total charge but much more on the ligands
acceptor and donor strengths. Additionally, the position of the positive
charge in the backbone of compound 6 was found to have
a significant effect. Shifting the positive charge in the pyridyl
unit to the ortho position of the ligand shortens the C–S bond,
which is even further pronounced if, instead, the oxygen of the sulfonyl
moiety is protonated. This suggests that the distance of the positive
charge in the backbone of bisylides has a strong effect on their properties.An extensive EDA study revealed that introducing a negative charge
to a bisylide to form a metalated ylide results in the preference
of an ylidic electron-sharing bond between the central carbon atom
and the ligand L over a dative interaction. Double bonds are only
of relevance if the ligand L is a strong π acceptor (carbon-based
ligands). Consequently, an unsymmetrical bonding situation, P→C––L+, contributes to the bonding situation
in all structures, while a carbone-like bonding situation, P→C←L,
is only relevant for certain bisylides. This is especially interesting
for hexaphenylcarbodiphosphorane, for which the carbone structure B″ as well as the unsymmetrical structure B‴ are valid descriptions of the bonding situation (Figure ), with a slight preference
of the carbone structure. Altogether, these findings suggest that
the bonding situation, and with it the reactivities and donor properties
of these compounds, in metalated ylidescan be carefully tailored
by the design of the ligand L.
Reactivity and Coordination
Ability of Metalated Ylides
Applications in Organic Synthesis
For a long time, the Bestmann system 1 had been the
best studied metalated ylide. This yldiide was used in a series of
tandem reactions, which made use of 1 as a strong nucleophile
as well as a highly reactive Wittig-type reagent.[19] This intrinsic double reactivity was elegantly employed
in cyclization reactions such as to 16 or the formation
of alkynes like 15 or conjugated olefins (e.g., 14; Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Reactivity of the Metalated Ylide 2
In the case of the other isolated
metalated ylides 2–4, reactivity
studies mostly focused on the nucleophilicity of these systems. Reactions
with different electrophiles allowed facile access to functionalized
ylides, such as with halogen or phosphinyl moieties. Scheme summarizes a series of reactions
performed with 4. Here, a remarkable reactivity was observed
when 4 was treated with aldehydes. In contrast to simple
ylides and earlier reports by Corey and Kang, the Wittig-type reaction
was only observed in traces, while the acylated compounds 19 were the main products formed. Mechanistically, this was explained
by formation of the alcoholato intermediate analogous to classical
Wittig reactions. However, because of the high donor ability of the
ylide ligand, this intermediate formally eliminates a hydride (to 19a) or an aryl anion (to 19b) in the next step
to form the carbonyl compounds.
Scheme 4
Reactivity of the Yldiide 4-Na
Applications in Main-Group-Element
Chemistry
The use of metalated ylides in the coordination
of main-group-element species and compounds has only scarcely been
studied until today. The first studies were performed with boranes
and chloroboranes, although initially the ylide substituent was introduced
after borane functionalization and no metalated ylide was used as
a ligand precursor.[29] The only direct use
of a metalated ylide to stabilize reactive main-group-element compounds
was only reported recently by our group, employing the sulfonyl-substituted
yldiide 4-Na. The direct treatment of 4-Na with borane Lewis base adducts selectively delivered the bisylide-functionalized
borane 20 in high yields (Figure ).[22] Here, the
electron deficiency in the monomericborane species is compensated
for because of the high donorcapacity of the yldiide and its ability
to function as σ- and π-donor ligands. This was confirmed
by the short C–B distances as well as the π bonding obvious
in the molecular orbitals of 20. Furthermore, the high
donor strength of the ylide ligand was demonstrated by the stabilization
of boroncations.[30] These were found to
be readily available by hydride abstraction from 20 using
trityl salts with weakly coordinated anions[31] or the highly Lewis acidic B(C6F5)3.[32] Cation 21 and Lewis base
adducts thereof were revealed to be thermally highly stable. The stability
was referred to the special donor properties of the ylide ligand,
which results, on the one hand, in strong electrostatic interactions
and, on the other hand, in π delocalization within the whole
C–B–C linkage (cf. the HOMO–1 in Figure ).
Figure 8
(Top) Synthesis of borane 20 and borenium cations 21. (Bottom) Molecular
structure of 21e (PF6– not
shown) and HOMO–1 of a hydrogen-substituted model system of 21.
(Top) Synthesis of borane 20 and borenium cations 21. (Bottom) Molecular
structure of 21e (PF6– not
shown) and HOMO–1 of a hydrogen-substituted model system of 21.Although 4 is the only metalated ylide, which has been used as an isolated
ligand to stabilize low-valent or electron-deficient main-group-element
species, the potential of these ligands as strong donor ligands has
indirectly been proven by the use of ylide functionalization, in which
the ylide moiety was constructed in the course of the compound synthesis.
One example was reported by Schmidpeter and co-workers in 1997, who
showed that ylide functionalization efficiently stabilizes phospheniumcations such as 22.[33] These
cations were prepared by a one-pot synthesis from phosphonium salts
using phosphorus trichloride and trimethylamine as bases or from silyl-substituted
ylides by chlorosilane elimination (Scheme ). Most interestingly, the ylide substituents
effected the spontaneous dissociation of the corresponding chlorophosphines
to the ionicphosphenium halides 22 in solution as well
as in the solid state. Hence, no use of weakly coordinating anions
was necessary. The phospheniumcations showed the typical low-field-shifted
signals in the 31P NMR spectra and a bent C–P–C
moiety with an angle of 113.9(3)°. The stability of the cationic
species was referred to as the charge delocalization on the two ylide
moieties, as shown by the resonance formulas 22′ and 22″.
Scheme 5
Preparation of Ylide-Stabilized Phosphenium
Cations
Besides stabilizing
cationiccompounds, ylide functionalization was also used to stabilize
low-valent species, such as carbenes and silylenes. This was demonstrated
by Driess, Kawashima, and Fürstner by means of the preparation
of 23–25[34] (Figure ) as well
as by computational studies by Borthakur and Phukan.[35] The ylide-functionalized carbenes were shown to be exceptionally
strong electron-releasing ligands, surpassing the traditional N-heterocycliccarbenes in this regard.
Figure 9
Carbenes and silylenes stabilized by ylide functionalization.
Carbenes and silylenes stabilized by ylide functionalization.
Applications in Transition-Metal
Chemistry
The use of metalated ylides in transition-metalchemistry has first been demonstrated by Niecke and co-workers. The
yldiide 3b was employed in a salt metathesis reaction
to form the bisylide-functionalized mercurycompound 26 (Scheme ). In the
molecular structure, 26 featured a linear C–Hg–C
arrangement and short P–C distances comparable to those found
in the yldiide 3b suggesting a still present high negative
charge at the ylidiccarbon atom.
Scheme 6
Synthesis of a Bisylide-Substituted
Mercury(II) Complex
Because of the lack of readily available yldiides, no
other direct conversions to their transition-metalcomplexes have
been reported. However, their potential has been demonstrated by the
introduction of ylide ligands via other synthetic routes. One of the
most interesting applications certainly concerns the potential access
of phosphonium alkylidenecomplexes [M=C(R)PR3].[36] These complexes have mostly been synthesized
from ylides and subsequent α-H abstraction or H2 elimination. Figure shows selected
examples of isolated complexes. These alkylidenecomplexes feature
a unique electronic structure that is described by different resonance
structures C and C′. Accordingly,
the complexes typically show short M–C distances in the range
of metalcarbon double bonds. In the case of the ruthenium complex 29, these special properties revealed to be beneficial to
support high catalytic activities in ring-closing metathesis reactions.
The high activity of 27 was explained by the fact that
the phosphonium alkylidene allowed stabilization of the low-coordinate
rutheniumcenter, which, in contrast to Grubbs-type systems, does
not need to dissociate a ligand for the ruthenium complex to enter
the catalyticcycle.
Figure 10
Examples of phosphonium alkylidene complexes.
Examples of phosphonium alkylidenecomplexes.
Conclusions and Perspectives
Although the number of metalated ylides is still extremely limited,
their unique electronic properties and donor abilities have been demonstrated
by a series of impressive examples. Their unique donorcapacity and
their potential to function as strong X- and L-type donor ligands
have been confirmed by computational studies as well as experimental
work in organic, main-group-element, and transition-metalchemistry.
Particularly their use in the stabilization of electron-deficient
and low-valent main-group-element species seems to be by far underdeveloped.
Given the recent developments in this field of research, which have
especially been stimulated by the design of new supporting ligand
systems, many more exciting results can be expected by ylide functionalization.
This will immensely benefit from the preparation of new stable and
readily available yldiides, which allow for a more facile and versatile
application.
Authors: Sergio Pascual; Matthew Asay; Ona Illa; Tsuyoshi Kato; Guy Bertrand; Nathalie Saffon-Merceron; Vicenç Branchadell; Antoine Baceiredo Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2007 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Chandrajeet Mohapatra; Lennart T Scharf; Thorsten Scherpf; Bert Mallick; Kai-Stephan Feichtner; Christopher Schwarz; Viktoria H Gessner Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Christopher Schwarz; Lennart T Scharf; Thorsten Scherpf; Julia Weismann; Viktoria H Gessner Journal: Chemistry Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Mike Jörges; Alexander Kroll; Leif Kelling; Richard Gauld; Bert Mallick; Stefan M Huber; Viktoria H Gessner Journal: ChemistryOpen Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Thorsten Scherpf; Christopher Schwarz; Lennart T Scharf; Jana-Alina Zur; Andreas Helbig; Viktoria H Gessner Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 15.336