Literature DB >> 28240404

Etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab in psoriasis: analysis of 209 treatment series in Austria.

Leo Richter1, Igor Vujic1,2, Alma Sesti1, Babak Monshi1, Martina Sanlorenzo3, Christian Posch1,2, Klemens Rappersberger1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Widely used in the treatment of psoriasis, biologics have been tested in numerous clinical trials. However, drug efficacies and adverse events (AEs) may differ in 'real-world' patients as they do not undergo as rigorous selection and monitoring. Our objective was to examine drug survival, efficacy, and AEs (quality, time of onset) in 'real-world' psoriasis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data analysis (Jan 1, 2004 to Jun 30, 2015) of patients treated at a psoriasis clinic in an Austrian hospital. All patients who had received at least one dose of etanercept, adalimumab, or ustekinumab were included in the analysis. We analyzed: demographics, drug survival, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), as well as quality and time of onset of AEs.
RESULTS: In 209 treatment series, the estimated median drug survival varied among the various treatments: 21 months (SE: 6.9) for etanercept, 61 months (SE: 9.4) for adalimumab, and 65 months (SE 1.4) for ustekinumab. Male gender and pretreatment with a biologic were positive predictors of longer drug survival in adalimumab. We found no significant difference in drug efficacy as determined by PASI.
CONCLUSIONS: Most AEs occur during the first year of treatment. Adalimumab and ustekinumab are marked by longer drug survival compared to etanercept.
© 2017 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28240404     DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges        ISSN: 1610-0379            Impact factor:   5.584


  3 in total

1.  Direct Comparison of Real-world Effectiveness of Biologics for Psoriasis using Absolute and Relative Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Scores in a Prospective Multicentre Cohort.

Authors:  Marloes E Van Muijen; Sarah E Thomas; Hans M M Groenewoud; Marisol E Otero; Paul M Ossenkoppele; Marcellus D Njoo; Sharon R P Dodemont; Else N Kop; Maartje A M Berends; Marjolein I A Koetsier; Johannes M Mommers; John E M Körver; Ron A Tupker; Marjolein S De Bruin-Weller; Lizelotte J M T Weppner-Parren; Bas Peters; Marloes M Kleinpenning; Astrid L A Kuijpers; W Peter Arnold; Paula P M Van Lümig; Juul M P A Van den Reek; Elke M G J De Jong
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Effect of Sex in Systemic Psoriasis Therapy: Differences in Prescription, Effectiveness and Safety in the BIOBADADERM Prospective Cohort.

Authors:  Carlos Pelayo Hernández-Fernández; Gregorio Carretero; Raquel Rivera; Carlos Ferrándiz; Esteban Daudén; Pablo de Cueva; Isabel Belinchón; Francisco Javier Gómez-García; Enrique Herrera-Acosta; Diana P Ruiz-Genao; Marta Ferrán; Mercé Alsina; Ofelia Baniandrés-Rodríguez; José Luis Sánchez-Carazo; Rafael Botella-Estrada; Antonio Sahuquillo-Torralba; Lourdes Rodríguez; Jaime Vilar-Alejo; Carmen García-Donoso; José M Carrascosa; Mar Llamas-Velasco; Enrique Herrera-Ceballos; Jose Luis López-Estebaranz; Conrad Pujol-Marco; Miguel Angel Descalzo; Ignacio Garcia-Doval
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Drug survival of biologics in treating psoriasis: a meta-analysis of real-world evidence.

Authors:  Pei-Tzu Lin; Shu-Hui Wang; Ching-Chi Chi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.