| Literature DB >> 28240300 |
Padmaja Krishnan1, Minghui Liu1, Pierre A Itty2, Zhi Liu3, Vanessa Rheinheimer1, Min-Hong Zhang1, Paulo J M Monteiro2, Liya E Yu1.
Abstract
Consecutive eight study phases under the successive presence and absence of UV irradiation, water vapor, and oxygen were conducted to characterize surface changes in the photocatalytic TiO2 powder using near-ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Both Ti 2p and O 1s spectra show hysteresis through the experimental course. Under all the study environments, the bridging hydroxyl (OHbr) and terminal hydroxyl (OHt) are identified at 1.1-1.3 eV and 2.1-2.3 eV above lattice oxygen, respectively. This enables novel and complementary approach to characterize reactivity of TiO2 powder. The dynamic behavior of surface-bound water molecules under each study environment is identified, while maintaining a constant distance of 1.3 eV from the position of water vapor. In the dark, the continual supply of both water vapor and oxygen is the key factor retaining the activated state of the TiO2 powder for a time period. Two new surface peaks at 1.7-1.8 and 4.0-4.2 eV above lattice oxygen are designated as peroxides (OOH/H2O2) and H2O2 dissolved in water, respectively. The persistent peroxides on the powder further explain previously observed prolonged oxidation capability of TiO2 powder without light irradiation.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28240300 PMCID: PMC5327435 DOI: 10.1038/srep43298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Hysteresis trend in Ti 2p spectra through eight study phases.
The dashed vertical line is added to guide the visual observation.
Figure 2Hysteresis trend in O 1s spectra through eight study phases.
The dashed vertical line is added to guide the visual observation.
Discussed binding energy (eV) and relative position of the Ti 2p and O 1s species during individual study phases.
| Species | Study phase | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| Surface adsorbed species | ||||||||
| Ti 2p3/2 | 459.3 | 459.3 | 459.1 | 459.0 | 459.0 | 459.2 | 459.2 | 459.2 |
| Lattice O | 530.7 | 530.6 | 530.4 | 530.4 | 530.4 | 530.5 | 530.5 | 530.5 |
| OHbr | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| peroxides | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | |||
| OHt | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| O2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 | ||
| H2O | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OHbr | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| OHt | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| H2O2(l) | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | |||||
| Airborne species | ||||||||
| H2O(g) | 5.1 | 4.9 | 4.8 | |||||
| O2(g) | 8.4 | 8.3 | ||||||
| O2(g) | 9.5 | 9.4 | ||||||
aThe reference for the relative position of other O 1s species shown below.
bThe BE distance between surface adsorbed water molecules and OHbr.
cThe BE distance between surface adsorbed water molecules and OHt.
Figure 3Enlarged spectra between BE 528.0–537.0 eV are provided for phases 4 and 5 to more clearly show the deconvoluted peaks.
Photocatalytic activation mechanism of TiO2.
| Reaction | Reference | |
|---|---|---|
| R1 | TiO2 + | |
| R2 | ecb− + | |
| R3 | ||
| R4 | ||
| R5 | ecb− + O2 → O2 | |
| R6 | O2 | |
| R7 | O2 + H | |
| R8 | HO2 | |
| R9 | H2O2 + | |
| R10 | H2O2 + ecb− → | |
hν: photons, hvb+: valence band hole, ecb−: conduction band electron, ·OH: hydroxyl radical, OH−: hydroxide, O2·−: superoxide radical, HO2·: hydroperoxyl radical, H2O2: hydrogen peroxide.
Figure 4Schematic study environment for the in situ near ambient pressure XPS scans during individual eight study phases.