| Literature DB >> 28239612 |
Brian M Barth1, Nichole R Keasey1, Xujung Wang1, Sriram S Shanmugavelandy2, Raajit Rampal3, Todd Hricik3, Myles C Cabot4, Mark Kester5, Hong-Gang Wang6, Leonard D Shultz7, Martin S Tallman8, Ross L Levine3, Thomas P Loughran5, David F Claxton1.
Abstract
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a highly heterogeneous and poor prognosis disease with few available therapeutic options. Novel advances are urgently needed, however effective models to test experimental therapeutics have been lacking. Recently, NOD/SCID/IL2rγnull (NSG) mice were shown to engraft primary human AML in a manner that recapitulated the natural disease and its progression. Additionally, integrated genomic profiling was used to refine risk stratification of AML. In this study, we demonstrated the engraftment of molecularly defined primary AML in NSG mice. We showed that AML that express DNMT3A mutations, which predict for adverse outcome, engrafted with exceptional efficacy. Lastly, we demonstrated that human AML-engrafted NSG mice can be effectively used to study novel ceramide-based therapeutics. Ceramide is a bioactive sphingolipid that has been implicated as an inducer of apoptosis. Elevation in cancer cell ceramide levels either via exogenous delivery or by provoking intracellular ceramide generation is the goal of ceramide-based therapeutics. In this study, we used the human AML-engrafted NSG mouse model to evaluate nanoliposomal short-chain C6-ceramide and a nanoliposomal formulation of the ceramide-inducer tamoxifen. Altogether, the NSG model is likely to prove invaluable in the study of novel agents, sushc as ceramide-based therapeutics, with the ability to define therapeutic activity against specific molecularly defined and risk stratified AML.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Ceramide; DNMT3A; Integrated genetic profiling; NSG mouse; Nanoliposome; Tamoxifen
Year: 2014 PMID: 28239612 PMCID: PMC5321614 DOI: 10.4172/2329-6917.1000146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Leuk (Los Angel) ISSN: 2329-6917
Figure 1Monitoring the therapeutic efficacy of C6-ceramide and tamoxifen nanoliposomes in NSG mice engrafted with human AML. NSG mice were given sublethal total body irradiation prior to engraftment with human AML via tail vein injection. Engraftment was evaluated by flow cytometry of the peripheral blood (A), and bone marrow (B), using anti-human CD13, CD33, HLA-DR, and CD45 antibodies. (C) Treatment was initiated following engraftment confirmation, and the anti-AML efficacy of C6-ceramide nanoliposomes (Lip-C6), or control nanoliposomes (Lip-Ghost), was evaluated using NSG mice engrafted with a poor prognosis human AML sample (inv3, -7), and leukemia burden was routinely monitored by analysis of blood collected from tail vein prick. *p<0.001, 2-way ANOVA, n=4 mice per group, error bars represent standard error of the mean. (D) Human AML engraftment was assessed by flow cytometry of spleen and bone marrow preparations following necropsy at day 98. Included is a comparison with tamoxifen nanoliposomes (Lip-Tam), as well as nanoliposomes loaded with both C6-ceramide and tamoxifen (Lip-C6/Tam) (*p=0.0317, unpaired t-test comparing Lip-Ghost and Lip-Tam).
| AML Sample # | Cytogenetic Category (2010 MRC classification) | Mutations | Integrated Genetic Risk Profile | WBC (×1000/μl) at sample collection | # Mice Engrafting (> 0.5%)/Total # Mice Evaluated | Max% Primary Engraftment | Max% Secondary Engraftment (Blood) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 146 | Intermediate (Normal Karyotype) | FLT3-ITD, DNMT3a R882H | Poor | 14.2 | 1/1 | 30 (Blood) | 55 |
| 202 | Intermediate (Normal Karyotype) | FLT3-ITD, IDH2 R140Q, DNMT3A R882P | Poor | 58.4 | 2/2 | 13.5 (Marrow) | NA |
| 329 | Unfavorable inv3, −7) | NA | Poor | 41.9 | 4/4 | 63 (Blood) | 52 |
| 370 | Intermediate Normal Karyotype) | FLT3-ITD, ASXL1 E1102D | Poor | 61 | 2/2 | 2 (Marrow) | NA |
| 436 | Intermediate Normal Karyotype) | FLT3-ITD | Intermediate | 23.6 | 2/2 | 61 (Blood) | 23.9 |
| 441 | Intermediate Normal Karyotype) | FLT3-ITD | Intermediate | 82.7 | 4/4 | 44 (Blood) | 48 |
| 448 | Favorable (inv16) | NA | Good | 110.6 | 1/2 | 58 (Blood) | 4.9 |
| 452 | Intermediate (der12, t8;12) | FLT3-ITD | Intermediate | 63.5 | 2/4 | 42 (Marrow) | 1.3 |
| 476 | Unfavorable (Complex Karyotype) | NA | Poor | 91.9 | 1/3 | 3.4 (Marrow) | NA |
| 481 | Intermediate (t9;11, +8) | FLT3 D835 | Intermediate | 95.75 | 5/6 | 17 (Marrow) | 0 |
| 482 | Intermediate (del9) | NPM1, DNMT3A R882H | Intermediate | 17.03 | 2/2 | 74 (Marrow) | 0 |
| 489 | Intermediate (+19) | IDH2 R140Q | Intermediate | 14.99 | 0/1 | 0 (Blood) | NA |
| 541 | Intermediate (Normal Karyotype) | FLT3-ITD, NPM1, IDH1 R132H | Intermediate | 191. 57 | 3/3 | 1.5 (Blood) | NA |
| 555 | Intermediate (t9;11) | none | Intermediate | 15.78 | 2/2 | 12.9 (Blood) | NA |
Figure 2DNMT3A mutation predicts for enhanced engraftment in NSG mice. The integrated genetic risk profile, or DNMT3A mutation, was used to rank cases for linear regression analysis (1=good, 2=intermediate, 3=poor, 4=DNMT3A mutation).