| Literature DB >> 28239110 |
Andreas W Hempel1, Maurice G O'Sullivan2, Dmitri B Papkovsky3, Joseph P Kerry4.
Abstract
Optical oxygen sensors were used to ascertain the level of oxygen consumed by individual salad leaves for optimised packaging of ready-to-eat (RTE) Italian salad mixes during refrigerated storage. Seven commonly found leaves in Italian salad mixes were individually assessed for oxygen utilisation in packs. Each leaf showed varying levels of respiration throughout storage. Using the information obtained, an experimental salad mix was formulated (termed Mix 3) which consisted of the four slowest respiring salad leaves-Escarole, Frisee, Red Batavia, Lollo Rosso. Mix 3 was then compared against two commercially available Italian salads; Mix 1 (Escarole, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso) and Mix 2 (Cos, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso). Optical sensors were used to non-destructively monitor oxygen usage in all mixes throughout storage. In addition to oxygen consumption, all three salad mixes were quality assessed in terms of microbial load and sensorial acceptability. In conclusion, Mix 3 was found to consume the least amount of oxygen over time, had the lowest microbial load and was most sensorially preferred (p < 0.05) in terms of overall appearance and acceptability. This study clearly shows the potential that oxygen sensors possess in terms of assisting in the optimised development of commercial RTE salad products.Entities:
Keywords: modified atmosphere packaging; oxygen sensors; packaging; ready-to-eat salads; sensory; storage
Year: 2013 PMID: 28239110 PMCID: PMC5302261 DOI: 10.3390/foods2020213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Leaf content in salad mixes.
| Sample | Leaf content |
|---|---|
| Mix 1 | Escarole, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso |
| Mix 2 | Cos, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso |
| Mix 3 | Escarole, Frisee, Red Batavia, Lollo Rosso |
List of descriptors for sensory analysis.
| Attribute-sensory | Descriptor | Scale |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| 0 = extremely dislike, 10 = extremely like |
| 0 = none, 10 = extreme | ||
| 0 = none, 10 = extreme | ||
| 0 = none, 10 = extreme | ||
| 0 = none, 10 = extreme | ||
| 0 = none, 10 = extreme | ||
| 0 = none, 10 = extreme | ||
| 0 = extremely dislike, 10 = extremely like | ||
| 0 = extremely dislike, 10 = extremely like |
Significance of estimated coefficients (ANOVA p-values) for sensory terms as derived by Jack-knife uncertainty testing for Italian-style salad leaf Mixes 1, 2 and 3.
| Salad type | Day storage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mix 1 | Mix 2 | Mix 3 | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7 | |
| Overall appearance | −0.38 | −0.36 | 0.005 ** | 0.007 ** | 0.47 | −0.0003 *** |
| Wilting appearance | 0.41 | 0.34 | −0.009 ** | −0.018 * | −0.46 | 0.0014 ** |
| Leaves Superficial Browning (LSB) | 0.53 | 0.25 | −0.21 | −0.19 | −0.51 | 0.16 |
| Leaves Edges Browning (LEB) | 0.51 | 0.21 | −0.12 | −0.14 | −0.48 | 0.093 |
| Texture/non-crispy | 0.34 | 0.41 | −0.012 * | −0.016 * | −0.50 | 0.01 ** |
| Overall flavour | −0.38 | −0.47 | 0.13 | 0.018* | 0.52 | −0.03 * |
| Off aroma | −0.49 | −0.64 | −0.47 | 0.51 | 0.62 | −0.51 |
| Off flavour | −0.53 | −0.57 | −0.44 | 0.42 | 0.68 | −0.47 |
| Overall acceptability | −0.33 | −0.44 | 0.033 * | 0.0046 ** | 0.51 | −0.0041 ** |
ns = not significant; * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001.
Figure 1Represents the mean (n = 12) oxygen levels in packs of commercially available Italian mix leaves salad (±standard deviation).
Consumption of O2 by seven individual salad leaf types typically used in Italian-style RTE mixed salad leaf products (including standard deviation).
| Salad leaf | Storage (day) | Differential (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 7 | Day 10 | Day 0–7 | |
| Escarole | 20.82 ± 0.12 | 13.31 ± 0.32 | 9.42 ± 0.33 | 8.20 ± 0.28 | 8.08 ± 0.17 | 12.62 |
| Cos | 20.63 ± 0.14 | 10.52 ± 0.51 | 8.21 ± 1.21 | 7.34 ± 1.21 | 7.17 ± 0.92 | 13.29 |
| Lollo Rosso | 20.91 ± 0.11 | 12.01 ± 0.47 | 9.80 ± 0.87 | 8.54 ± 0.82 | 8.36 ± 0.76 | 12.37 |
| Frisee | 20.52 ± 0.10 | 12.10 ± 1.58 | 9.39 ± 2.77 | 8.01 ± 3.13 | 7.93 ± 2.14 | 12.51 |
| Radicchio | 20.44 ± 0.08 | 10.04 ± 0.73 | 5.78 ± 0.91 | 4.57 ± 0.90 | 4.57 ± 0.63 | 15.87 |
| Iceberg | 20.70 ± 0.12 | 9.09 ± 0.74 | 6.11 ± 1.12 | 5.26 ± 1.01 | 4.88 ± 0.45 | 15.44 |
| Red Batavia | 20.72 ± 0.09 | 12.31 ± 1.97 | 8.90 ± 0.84 | 7.50 ± 0.88 | 7.29 ± 0.37 | 13.22 |
Ranking of individual salad leaf types in terms of O2 consumption within refrigerated MA packs; lowest O2 consumption (1) to highest O2 consumption (7).
| Ranking | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 7 | Day 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Escarole | Lollo Rosso | Lollo Rosso | Lollo Rosso |
| 2 | Red Batavia | Escarole | Escarole | Escarole |
| 3 | Frisee | Frisee | Frisee | Frisee |
| 4 | Lollo Rosso | Red Batavia | Red Batavia | Red Batavia |
| 5 | Cos | Cos | Cos | Cos |
| 6 | Radicchio | Iceberg | Iceberg | Iceberg |
| 7 | Iceberg | Radicchio | Radicchio | Radicchio |
Table represents the mean log cfu/g of each salad leaf (±standard deviation).
| Salad leaf | Storage (day) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 7 | Day 10 | |
| Cos | 2.2 ± 0.27 | 3.1 ± 0.47 | 4.3 ± 0.16 | 6.3 ± 0.09 ^ | n/d |
| Escarole | 4.5 ± 0.14 | 4.9 ± 0.09 | 5.3 ± 0.28 | 6.5 ± 0.04 ^ | n/d |
| Frisee | 4.8 ± 0.09 | 5.1 ± 0.17 | 5.5 ± 0.19 | 6.5 ± 0.08 ^ | n/d |
| Lollo Rosso | 4.3 ± 0.22 | 4.8 ± 0.31 | 5.4 ± 0.14 | 6.0 ± 0.13 ^ | n/d |
| Radicchio | 4.6 ± 0.34 | 5.0 ± 0.07 | 5.8 ± 0.21 | 6.5 ± 0.12 ^ | n/d |
| Red Batavia | 4.5 ± 0.29 | 5.1 ± 0.19 | 5.6 ± 0.17 | 6.5 ± 0.09 ^ | n/d |
| Iceberg | 3.0 ± 0.08 | 3.8 ± 0.70 | 4.3 ± 0.05 | 5.6 ± 0.04 ^ | 6.1 ± 0.07 ^ |
^ Exceeds limits of 106 or 6 log cfu/g; n/d—not determined.
Salad leaves ranked in terms of lowest log cfu/g (1 to 7) on day 1, 3, 5 and 7
| Rank | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cos | Cos | Cos | Iceberg |
| 2 | Iceberg | Iceberg | Iceberg | Lollo Rosso |
| 3 | Lollo Rosso | Escarole | Escarole | Cos |
| 4 | Red Batavia | Lollo Rosso | Lollo Rosso | Red Batavia |
| 5 | Escarole | Frisee | Frisee | Frisee |
| 6 | Radicchio | Red Batavia | Red Batavia | Escarole |
| 7 | Frisee | Radicchio | Radicchio | Radicchio |
Represents the mean % O2 by optical sensor (*) and log cfu/g incl. standard deviation (^) found in each mix on day 0, 3, 5 and 7.
| Sample | Leaves | Day storage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 7 | Day 10 | ||
| Mix 1 * | Escarole, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso | 20.33 ± 0.11 | 13.45 ± 1.54 | 13.45 ± 1.54 | 8.13 ± 1.45 | 7.93 ± 1.22 |
| Mix 2 * | Cos, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso | 20.18 ± 0.10 | 12.98 ± 1.19 | 12.98 ± 1.19 | 7.61 ± 1.80 | 7.11 ± 1.46 |
| Mix 3 * | Escarole, Frisee, Red Batavia, Lollo Rosso | 20.64 ± 0.05 | 14.69 ± 0.59 | 14.69 ± 0.59 | 9.25 ± 0.59 | 8.15 ± 0.37 |
| Mix 1 ^ | Escarole, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso | 3.24 ± 0.34 | 4.84 ± 0.24 | 5.52 ± 0.30 | 6.81 ± 0.28 | n/d |
| Mix 2 ^ | Cos, Frisee, Radicchio, Lollo Rosso | 3.12 ± 0.15 | 4.00 ± 0.21 | 5.31 ± 0.23 | 6.21 ± 0.31 | n/d |
| Mix 3 ^ | Escarole, Frisee, Red Batavia, Lollo Rosso | 2.67 ± 0.17 | 3.86 ± 0.12 | 4.97 ± 0.09 | 5.79 ± 0.20 | 6.21 ± 0.27 |
n/d—not determined.
Figure 2An overview of the variation found in the mean data from the ANOVA-partial least squares regression (APLSR) correlation loadings plot for each of the three salad mixes.