David R Roalf1, Tyler M Moore2, Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton3, David A Wolk3, Steven E Arnold4, Daniel A Weintraub5, Paul J Moberg6. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: droalf@gmail.com. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Alzheimer's Disease Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Udall Center for Parkinson's Research, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (PADRECC) at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Alzheimer's Disease Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To provide a crosswalk between the recently proposed short Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) within a clinical cohort. METHODS: A total of 791 participants, with and without neurologic conditions, received both the MMSE and the MoCA at the same visit. s-MoCA scores were calculated and equipercentile equating was used to create a crosswalk between the s-MoCA and MMSE. RESULTS: As expected, s-MoCA scores were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.82, P < .001) with MMSE scores. s-MoCA scores correctly classified 85% of healthy older adults and 91% of individuals with neurologic conditions that impair cognition. In addition, we provide an easy to use table that enables the conversion of s-MoCA score to MMSE score. DISCUSSION: The s-MoCA is quick to administer, provides high sensitivity and specificity for cognitive impairment, and now can be compared directly with the MMSE.
INTRODUCTION: To provide a crosswalk between the recently proposed short Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) within a clinical cohort. METHODS: A total of 791 participants, with and without neurologic conditions, received both the MMSE and the MoCA at the same visit. s-MoCA scores were calculated and equipercentile equating was used to create a crosswalk between the s-MoCA and MMSE. RESULTS: As expected, s-MoCA scores were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.82, P < .001) with MMSE scores. s-MoCA scores correctly classified 85% of healthy older adults and 91% of individuals with neurologic conditions that impair cognition. In addition, we provide an easy to use table that enables the conversion of s-MoCA score to MMSE score. DISCUSSION: The s-MoCA is quick to administer, provides high sensitivity and specificity for cognitive impairment, and now can be compared directly with the MMSE.
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Tyler M Moore; J Cobb Scott; Steven P Reise; Allison M Port; Chad T Jackson; Kosha Ruparel; Adam P Savitt; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2015-03-30
Authors: Tamara G Fong; Michael A Fearing; Richard N Jones; Peilin Shi; Edward R Marcantonio; James L Rudolph; Frances M Yang; Dan K Kiely; Sharon K Inouye Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Cyndy B Cordell; Soo Borson; Malaz Boustani; Joshua Chodosh; David Reuben; Joe Verghese; William Thies; Leslie B Fried Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: David R Roalf; Paul J Moberg; Sharon X Xie; David A Wolk; Stephen T Moelter; Steven E Arnold Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Cindy Zadikoff; Susan H Fox; David F Tang-Wai; Teri Thomsen; Rob M A de Bie; Pettarusup Wadia; Janis Miyasaki; Sarah Duff-Canning; Anthony E Lang; Connie Marras Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Ondrej Bezdicek; Markéta Červenková; Tyler M Moore; Hana Stepankova Georgi; Zdenek Sulc; David A Wolk; Daniel A Weintraub; Paul J Moberg; Robert Jech; Miloslav Kopecek; David R Roalf Journal: Assessment Date: 2018-06-21
Authors: Shahzad Shaefi; Puja Shankar; Ariel L Mueller; Brian P O'Gara; Kyle Spear; Kamal R Khabbaz; Aranya Bagchi; Louis M Chu; Valerie Banner-Goodspeed; David E Leaf; Daniel S Talmor; Edward R Marcantonio; Balachundhar Subramaniam Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Anne Thackeray; Robin L Marcus; Lan Yu; Polly McCracken; Beth Cardell; Janel Hanmer Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.966