Literature DB >> 28238673

Bisphosphonate Use After Hip Fracture in Older Adults: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Peter Nordström1, Annika Toots2, Yngve Gustafson3, Karl-Göran Thorngren4, Ami Hommel4, Anna Nordström5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between bisphosphonate use and the risk of new fracture in a nationwide cohort of individuals with previous hip fractures, with emphasis on individuals above 80 years of age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From a nationwide cohort with hip fracture (2006-2012) (n = 93, 601), each individual prescribed bisphosphonates after hip fracture (n = 5845) was matched with up to three individuals not prescribed bisphosphonates, resulting in a cohort of 21,363 individuals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A new hip fracture.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 2.98 (range, 0.02-8) years, 4581 fractures occurred in the cohort. Before the initiation of bisphosphonate therapy, individuals later prescribed bisphosphonates had an increased risk of hip fracture (multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.23-3.24) compared with controls. In the period after bisphosphonate therapy initiation, individuals prescribed bisphosphonates had a lower risk of hip fracture (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90) compared with controls. Similar effects were seen after the initiation of bisphosphonates in individuals aged more than 80 years (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99). In contrast, the initiation of bisphosphonate therapy did not influence the risk of injurious falls not resulting in fracture (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86-1.05).
CONCLUSION: Bisphosphonate use was associated with a decreased risk of hip fracture in this nationwide cohort of older men and women, with similar risk reductions in individuals older than 80 years.
Copyright © 2017 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip fractures; bisphosphonates; cohort study; older individuals

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28238673     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  4 in total

1.  Editorial: Orthogeriatrics and Hip Fractures.

Authors:  A M Sanford; J E Morley; A McKee
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Does treatment with bisphosphonates protect against fractures in real life? The HUNT study, Norway.

Authors:  M Hoff; E Skovlund; H E Meyer; A Langhammer; A J Søgaard; U Syversen; K Holvik; B Abrahamsen; B Schei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Osteoporosis case ascertainment strategies in European and Asian countries: a comparative review.

Authors:  A M Burden; Y Tanaka; L Xu; Y-C Ha; E McCloskey; S R Cummings; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Adherence to Anti-Osteoporotic Treatment and Clinical Implications after Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ramona Dobre; Dan Alexandru Niculescu; Răzvan-Cosmin Petca; Răzvan-Ionuț Popescu; Aida Petca; Cătălina Poiană
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.