Daniel K Nishijima1, Samuel D Gaona2, Trent Waechter3, Ric Maloney4, Troy Bair5, Adam Blitz6, Andrew R Elms7, Roel D Farrales8, Calvin Howard9, James Montoya10, Jeneita M Bell11, Mark Faul11, David R Vinson12, Hernando Garzon12, James F Holmes2, Dustin W Ballard13. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: dnishijima@ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. 3. City of Sacramento Fire Department, Sacramento, CA. 4. Sacramento Metropolitan Fire Department, Sacramento, CA. 5. Cosumnes Community Services District Fire Department, Elk Grove, CA. 6. American Medical Response, Sacramento, CA. 7. Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center, Sacramento, CA. 8. Mercy General Hospital, Sacramento, CA. 9. City of Folsom Fire Department, Folsom, CA. 10. Sutter General Hospital, Sacramento, CA. 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 12. Kaiser Permanente Sacramento Medical Center, Sacramento, CA. 13. Kaiser Permanente San Rafael Medical Center, San Rafael, CA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Field triage guidelines recommend that emergency medical services (EMS) providers consider transport of head-injured older adults with anticoagulation use to trauma centers. However, the triage patterns and the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage or neurosurgery in these patients are unknown. Our objective is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of older adults with head trauma who are transported by EMS, particularly for patients who do not meet physiologic, anatomic, or mechanism-of-injury (steps 1 to 3) field triage criteria but are receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications. METHODS: This was a retrospective study at 5 EMS agencies and 11 hospitals (4 trauma centers, 7 nontrauma centers). Patients aged 55 years or older with head trauma who were transported by EMS were included. The primary outcome was the presence of intracranial hemorrhage. The secondary outcome was a composite measure of inhospital death or neurosurgery. RESULTS: Of the 2,110 patients included, 131 (6%) had intracranial hemorrhage and 41 (2%) had inhospital death or neurosurgery. There were 162 patients (8%) with steps 1 to 3 criteria. Of the remaining 1,948 patients without steps 1 to 3 criteria, 566 (29%) had anticoagulant or antiplatelet use. Of these patients, 52 (9%) had traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and 15 (3%) died or had neurosurgery. The sensitivity (adjusted for clustering by EMS agency) of steps 1 to 3 criteria was 19.8% (26/131; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5% to 51.2%) for identifying traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and 34.1% (14/41; 95% CI 9.9% to 70.1%) for death or neurosurgery. The additional criterion of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use improved the sensitivity for intracranial hemorrhage (78/131; 59.5%; 95% CI 42.9% to 74.2%) and death or neurosurgery (29/41; 70.7%; 95% CI 61.0% to 78.9%). CONCLUSION: Relatively few patients met steps 1 to 3 triage criteria. For individuals who did not have steps 1 to 3 criteria, nearly 30% had anticoagulant or antiplatelet use. A relatively high proportion of these patients had intracranial hemorrhage, but a much smaller proportion died or had neurosurgery during hospitalization. Use of steps 1 to 3 triage criteria alone is not sufficient in identifying intracranial hemorrhage and death or neurosurgery in this patient population. The additional criterion of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use improves the sensitivity of the instrument, with only a modest decrease in specificity.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Field triage guidelines recommend that emergency medical services (EMS) providers consider transport of head-injured older adults with anticoagulation use to trauma centers. However, the triage patterns and the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage or neurosurgery in these patients are unknown. Our objective is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of older adults with head trauma who are transported by EMS, particularly for patients who do not meet physiologic, anatomic, or mechanism-of-injury (steps 1 to 3) field triage criteria but are receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications. METHODS: This was a retrospective study at 5 EMS agencies and 11 hospitals (4 trauma centers, 7 nontrauma centers). Patients aged 55 years or older with head trauma who were transported by EMS were included. The primary outcome was the presence of intracranial hemorrhage. The secondary outcome was a composite measure of inhospital death or neurosurgery. RESULTS: Of the 2,110 patients included, 131 (6%) had intracranial hemorrhage and 41 (2%) had inhospital death or neurosurgery. There were 162 patients (8%) with steps 1 to 3 criteria. Of the remaining 1,948 patients without steps 1 to 3 criteria, 566 (29%) had anticoagulant or antiplatelet use. Of these patients, 52 (9%) had traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and 15 (3%) died or had neurosurgery. The sensitivity (adjusted for clustering by EMS agency) of steps 1 to 3 criteria was 19.8% (26/131; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5% to 51.2%) for identifying traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and 34.1% (14/41; 95% CI 9.9% to 70.1%) for death or neurosurgery. The additional criterion of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use improved the sensitivity for intracranial hemorrhage (78/131; 59.5%; 95% CI 42.9% to 74.2%) and death or neurosurgery (29/41; 70.7%; 95% CI 61.0% to 78.9%). CONCLUSION: Relatively few patients met steps 1 to 3 triage criteria. For individuals who did not have steps 1 to 3 criteria, nearly 30% had anticoagulant or antiplatelet use. A relatively high proportion of these patients had intracranial hemorrhage, but a much smaller proportion died or had neurosurgery during hospitalization. Use of steps 1 to 3 triage criteria alone is not sufficient in identifying intracranial hemorrhage and death or neurosurgery in this patient population. The additional criterion of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use improves the sensitivity of the instrument, with only a modest decrease in specificity.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Jeffrey M Caterino; Nicole V Brown; Maya W Hamilton; Brian Ichwan; Salman Khaliqdina; David C Evans; Subrahmanyan Darbha; Ashish R Panchal; Manish N Shah Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Niels K Rathlev; Ron Medzon; Doug Lowery; Charles Pollack; Mark Bracken; Glenn Barest; Allan B Wolfson; Jerome R Hoffman; William R Mower Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Daniel K Nishijima; Samuel D Gaona; Trent Waechter; Ric Maloney; Adam Blitz; Andrew R Elms; Roel D Farrales; James Montoya; Troy Bair; Calvin Howard; Megan Gilbert; Renee P Trajano; Kaela M Hatchel; Mark Faul; Jeneita M Bell; Victor C Coronado; David R Vinson; Dustin W Ballard; Daniel J Tancredi; Hernando Garzon; Kevin E Mackey; Kiarash Shahlaie; James F Holmes Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Elinore J Kaufman; Ashkan Ertefaie; Dylan S Small; Daniel N Holena; M Kit Delgado Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Abdullah Pandor; Gordon Fuller; Munira Essat; Lisa Sabir; Chris Holt; Helen Buckley Woods; Hridesh Chatha Journal: Br Paramed J Date: 2022-03-01
Authors: Jurgis Alvikas; Sara P Myers; Charles B Wessel; David O Okonkwo; Bellal Joseph; Carlos Pelaez; Cody Doberstein; Andrew R Guillotte; Matthew R Rosengart; Matthew D Neal Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Gail T Tominaga; Imad S Dandan; Kathryn B Schaffer; Fady Nasrallah; Melanie Gawlik R N; Jess F Kraus Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2017-09-11