Literature DB >> 28238452

Comparison of ultraviolet A light protection standards in the United States and European Union through in vitro measurements of commercially available sunscreens.

Steven Q Wang1, Haoming Xu2, Joseph W Stanfield3, Uli Osterwalder4, Bernd Herzog5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of adequate ultraviolet A light (UVA) protection has become apparent in recent years. The United States and Europe have different standards for assessing UVA protection in sunscreen products.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the in vitro critical wavelength (CW) and UVA protection factor (PF) of commercially available US sunscreen products and see if they meet standards set by the United States and the European Union.
METHODS: Twenty sunscreen products with sun protection factors ranging from 15 to 100+ were analyzed. Two in vitro UVA protection tests were conducted in accordance with the 2011 US Food and Drug Administration final rule and the 2012 International Organization for Standardization method for sunscreen effectiveness testing.
RESULTS: The CW of the tested sunscreens ranged from 367 to 382 nm, and the UVA PF of the products ranged from 6.1 to 32. Nineteen of 20 sunscreens (95%) met the US requirement of CW >370 nm. Eleven of 20 sunscreens (55%) met the EU desired ratio of UVA PF/SPF > 1:3. LIMITATIONS: The study only evaluated a small number of sunscreen products.
CONCLUSION: The majority of tested sunscreens offered adequate UVA protection according to US Food and Drug Administration guidelines for broad-spectrum status, but almost half of the sunscreens tested did not pass standards set in the European Union.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Keywords:  UVA protection; UVA protection factor; critical wavelength; photoprotection; sunscreen; ultraviolet A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28238452     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cutaneous Adverse Events of Anti-PD-1 Therapy and BRAF Inhibitors.

Authors:  Subashini Sharon Gnanendran; Lauren Maree Turner; James Austin Miller; Shelley Ji Eun Hwang; Andrew Charles Miller
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-03-19

Review 2.  Photoprotection in skin of color.

Authors:  Sokhna Seck; Judy Hamad; Sergio Schalka; Henry W Lim
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Fluorescent films based on PVDF doped with carbon dots for evaluation of UVA protection of sunscreens and fabrication of cool white LEDs.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Rivera; Simei Darinel Torres-Landa; Miriam Rangel-Ayala; Vivechana Agarwal
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Based Photodynamic Therapy Pretreatment Mitigates Ultraviolet A-Induced Oxidative Photodamage.

Authors:  Hui Hua; Jiawei Cheng; Wenbo Bu; Juan Liu; Weiwei Ma; Chenchen Si; Jie Wang; Bingrong Zhou; Dan Luo
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 5.  Sunscreen lotions in the dermatological prescription: review of concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Flavia Alvim Sant'anna Addor; Carlos Baptista Barcaui; Elimar Elias Gomes; Omar Lupi; Carolina Reato Marçon; Hélio Amante Miot
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.113

6.  Laboratory testing of sunscreens on the US market finds lower in vitro SPF values than on labels and even less UVA protection.

Authors:  David Q Andrews; Kali Rauhe; Carla Burns; Emily Spilman; Alexis M Temkin; Sean Perrone-Gray; Olga V Naidenko; Nneka Leiba
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 7.  Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Linna L Guan; Henry W Lim; Tasneem F Mohammad
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 7.403

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.