Bin Luo1, Gongbu Zhou2, Xiaogang Guo1, Xu Liu1, Jiandu Yang1, Qi Sun1, Jian Ma3, Shu Zhang1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: majian_fuwai@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing catheter ablation of left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) with the development of left posterior fascicular block (LPF block) and characteristics of repeat procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 195 patients (mean age 29.76±1.03years, 16.4% females) who underwent catheter ablation for LPF-VT were consecutively enrolled. The earliest ventricular potential with a single fused Purkinje potential (PP) during VT and the PP located in the inferior-apical or mid-apical septum during SR were targeted for linear ablation. The endpoint of the procedure was noninducible VT and development of new-onset LPF block. Follow-up with clinic visits or telephonic interviews, electrocardiogram (ECG), or Holter monitoring was performed after the procedure. With a median follow-up of 85 (18,181) months, 20 patients were censored and 152 of 175 (86.86%) patients had long-term freedom from VT after a single procedure. No statistical difference in the outcome of catheter ablation of LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible groups (P=0.89). Twenty-three patients exhibited recurrent LPF-VT. Seven of 23 patients developed new-onset left upper septal ventricular tachycardia that was successfully ablated. All the patients undergoing repeat procedures had freedom from VT. No procedural complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation of LPF-VT using the development of LPF block as the endpoint is associated with a high procedural success rate. No difference in freedom from LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible patients. New-onset LPF block recovery and non-early PP-QRS interval can be the predictors of LPF-VT repeat procedure.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing catheter ablation of left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) with the development of left posterior fascicular block (LPF block) and characteristics of repeat procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 195 patients (mean age 29.76±1.03years, 16.4% females) who underwent catheter ablation for LPF-VT were consecutively enrolled. The earliest ventricular potential with a single fused Purkinje potential (PP) during VT and the PP located in the inferior-apical or mid-apical septum during SR were targeted for linear ablation. The endpoint of the procedure was noninducible VT and development of new-onset LPF block. Follow-up with clinic visits or telephonic interviews, electrocardiogram (ECG), or Holter monitoring was performed after the procedure. With a median follow-up of 85 (18,181) months, 20 patients were censored and 152 of 175 (86.86%) patients had long-term freedom from VT after a single procedure. No statistical difference in the outcome of catheter ablation of LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible groups (P=0.89). Twenty-three patients exhibited recurrent LPF-VT. Seven of 23 patients developed new-onset left upper septal ventricular tachycardia that was successfully ablated. All the patients undergoing repeat procedures had freedom from VT. No procedural complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation of LPF-VT using the development of LPF block as the endpoint is associated with a high procedural success rate. No difference in freedom from LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible patients. New-onset LPF block recovery and non-early PP-QRS interval can be the predictors of LPF-VT repeat procedure.