Literature DB >> 28237532

Ureteral Reconstruction With Ileum: Long-term Follow-up of Renal Function.

Joshua D Roth1, Maria Francesca Monn1, Konrad M Szymanski1, Richard Bihrle1, Matthew J Mellon2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term renal preservation and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing ureteric substitution with ileum. This has been a mainstay of reconstruction options for lengthy ureteral defects.
METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 18 or older undergoing ileal ureters at our institution were retrospectively reviewed (from 1989 to June 2013). Patients with <6 months of follow-up were excluded. Demographic, surgical, and renal functional outcomes were reviewed. Renal function was assessed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equations.
RESULTS: Of the 108 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 86 (79.6%) had single-renal unit reconstruction and 22 had bilateral reconstruction. Eighty-four (77.8%) had radiation-induced stricture and 24 had iatrogenic or trauma-induced strictures. The median follow-up was 51 months (interquartile range: 22-112). Short-term complications included Clavien grade I (16 [14.8%]), Clavien grade II (3 [2.8%]), Clavien grade III (9 [8.3%]), and Clavien grade IV (3 [2.8%]). Long-term complications included fistula in 6 patients (5.6%), renal failure requiring dialysis in 2 patients (1.9%), hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in 4 patients (3.7%), and incisional hernia in 11 patients (10.2%). Nine patients (8.3%) had small-bowel obstructions; 3 (2.8%) required adhesiolysis. Four patients (3.7%) had an anastamotic stricture. Nineteen patients (17.6%) had worsening renal function. Cox proportional hazards regression found that those with bilateral repair were at 3.7 times increased risk of worsening renal function (P = .02).
CONCLUSION: Ureteral substitution with ileum provides an effective and versatile long-term reconstructive option with minimal renal function compromise in properly selected patients. Bilateral reconstruction may contribute to worse long-term renal function.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28237532     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Long term outcomes in the use of ileal ureter for radiation-induced ureteral strictures.

Authors:  M Francesca Monn; Joshua D Roth; Richard Bihrle; Matthew J Mellon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  A Review of Buccal Mucosa Graft Ureteroplasty.

Authors:  Ziho Lee; Aryeh Y Keehn; Matthew E Sterling; Michael J Metro; Daniel D Eun
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Endoscopic Management of Ureteral Strictures: an Update.

Authors:  Jacob W Lucas; Eric Ghiraldi; Jeffrey Ellis; Justin I Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Ureteral reconstruction for complex strictures: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Bilotta; Lucas R Wiegand; Kevin R Heinsimer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Intermediate-term outcomes after robotic ureteral reconstruction for long-segment (≥4 centimeters) strictures in the proximal ureter: A multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Matthew Lee; Ziho Lee; Helaine Koster; Minsuk Jun; Aeen M Asghar; Randall Lee; David Strauss; Neel Patel; Daniel Kim; Sreeya Komaravolu; Alice Drain; Michael J Metro; Lee Zhao; Michael Stifelman; Daniel D Eun
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-11-12

Review 6.  Buccal Mucosal Ureteroplasty for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: Patient Selection and Considerations.

Authors:  Ashley N Gonzalez; Kirtishri Mishra; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2022-04-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.