| Literature DB >> 28237214 |
Corinna Sorenson1, Gabriela Lavezzari2, Gregory Daniel2, Randy Burkholder3, Marc Boutin4, Edmund Pezalla5, Gillian Sanders6, Mark McClellan2.
Abstract
Rising costs without perceived proportional improvements in quality and outcomes have motivated fundamental shifts in health care delivery and payment to achieve better value. Aligned with these efforts, several value assessment frameworks have been introduced recently to help providers, patients, and payers better understand the potential value of drugs and other interventions and make informed decisions about their use. Given their early stage of development, it is imperative to evaluate these efforts on an ongoing basis to identify how best to support and improve them moving forward. This article provides a multistakeholder perspective on the key limitations and opportunities posed by the current value assessment frameworks and areas of and actions for improvement. In particular, we outline 10 fundamental guiding principles and associated strategies that should be considered in subsequent iterations of the existing frameworks or by emerging initiatives in the future. Although value assessment frameworks may not be able to meet all the needs and preferences of stakeholders, we contend that there are common elements and potential next steps that can be supported to advance value assessment in the United States.Entities:
Keywords: health care decision makers; standards; value assessment; value for money
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28237214 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Value Health ISSN: 1098-3015 Impact factor: 5.725