Literature DB >> 28237152

Patient comfort and visual outcomes of mini-scleral contact lenses.

Peng Yan1, Mustafa Kapasi1, Ronan Conlon1, Joshua C Teichman1, Season Yeung1, Yelin Yang1, Setareh Ziai1, Kashif Baig2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term visual outcome, patient acceptance, and tolerance of mini-scleral contact lenses (SCLs) in the management of various corneal pathologies.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two patients (40 eyes) who received mini-SCLs.
METHODS: Single-centre retrospective case series, between February 2010 and January 2013, of 32 patients (40 eyes) with various corneal pathologies who were offered either Maxim 5R, Maxim 7, or Maxim 7 × 11 mini-SCLs for nonsurgical optimization of visual correction. Patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months for assessment of best-corrected visual acuity, comfort, length of daily wear, and complications.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (40 eyes), with a mean age of 41 ± 16 years, opted to receive mini-SCLs. Eighteen patients had previously undergone surgery such as penetrating keratoplasty, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and intraocular lens implantation. The median best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.3 logMAR (range 0-1.3) before mini-SCLs, to 0.05 logMAR (range 0-1) with mini-SCLs (p < 0.0001). At 1-month follow-up, the median length of wear was 10 hours/day (range 1.5-15). At 3-month follow-up, the median length of wear was 12 hours/day (range 2-15). All eyes were comfortable at initial use of mini-SCLs and 91% were comfortable at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Mini-SCLs may be a comfortable management option for patients with keratoconus and other corneal pathologies who are unable to achieve adequate visual outcome with traditional spectacles or rigid gas-permeable contact lenses.
Copyright © 2017 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28237152     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  5 in total

1.  Visual Acuity and Refractive Error Improvement in Keratoconic Patients: A Low-Income Context Management Perspective.

Authors:  Walter Kibet Yego; Vanessa Raquel Moodley
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-08-19

Review 2.  Nonsurgical Procedures for Keratoconus Management.

Authors:  L Rico-Del-Viejo; M Garcia-Montero; J L Hernández-Verdejo; S García-Lázaro; F J Gómez-Sanz; A Lorente-Velázquez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights.

Authors:  Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Daddi Fadel; Melissa Barnett
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Effectiveness of More than 2-Year Treatment with Miniscleral Contact Lens in Ocular Surface Diseases: Four Case Reports.

Authors:  Min Sung Oh; Min Seung Kang; Su Hwan Park; Ji Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-05

5.  Fitting Tips and Visual Rehabilitation of Irregular Cornea with a New Design of Corneoscleral Contact Lens: Objective and Subjective Evaluation.

Authors:  Waleed Ali Abou Samra; Amani E Badawi; Hanem Kishk; Ayman Abd El Ghafar; Mohamed M Elwan; Hossam Youssef Abouelkheir
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.