Literature DB >> 28236928

Endovascular treatment of carotid blowout syndrome.

Kamila M Bond1, Waleed Brinjikji2, Mohammed H Murad3, Harry J Cloft4, Giuseppe Lanzino5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a life-threatening complication of head and neck cancer and radiation therapy. Endovascular techniques have emerged as preferable alternatives to surgical ligation for treatment of CBS. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study periprocedural complications and outcomes of CBS patients treated with coil embolization and covered stents.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified studies that reported outcomes of endovascular treatment of CBS published from 2000 to April 2016. Outcomes included technical success, postoperative rebleeding, survival time, and perioperative complications. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: Twenty-five noncomparative studies with 559 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rate was 100% in both coiling and covered stenting groups. Median survival time was 3 months (range, 0-96 months) for all CBS patients. Overall perioperative mortality was 11% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-17%). Postoperative rebleeding rate was 27% (95% CI, 19%-367%). Perioperative stroke and infection rates were 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) and 1% (95% CI, 0%-5%), respectively. At last follow-up, 39% of patients were alive (95% CI, 29%-48%).
CONCLUSIONS: Coil embolization and stent grafts may both be safe treatment options for CBS with few perioperative complications and high rates of technical success, but prognosis after treatment remains poor. In general, noncomparative studies do not demonstrate differences between the two techniques with respect to periprocedural complications and patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28236928     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cancer and Cerebrovascular Disease.

Authors:  Harold P Adams
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Verification of bleeding points in carotid blowout syndrome using guidewire manipulation.

Authors:  Chao-Bao Luo; Yuang-Seng Tsuei; Feng-Chi Chang; Ta-Wei Ting
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Endovascular management of the carotid blowout syndrome: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Hasanali Durmaz; Onur Ergun; Erdem Birgi; Ömer Bayir; Güleser Saylam
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Carotid blowout syndrome: modern trends in management.

Authors:  Carlos Suárez; Verónica Fernández-Alvarez; Marc Hamoir; William M Mendenhall; Primoz Strojan; Miquel Quer; Carl E Silver; Juan P Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Successful Endovascular Treatment of Delayed Spontaneous Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Blowout Following Orbital Exenteration and Radiation.

Authors:  Laura Reed; Kristopher Lyon; Ethan A Benardete
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-17

6.  Management of double carotid blowout with definitive repair after temporizing stent graft placement.

Authors:  Alexandra T Cocca; Brittany E Levy; Jennifer T Castle; Wesley S Wilt; Mark D Fleming; Alexandra E Kejner; Rony K Aouad; Samuel C Tyagi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2022-08-28

7.  Rupture of carotid artery pseudoaneurysm in the modern era of definitive chemoradiation for head and neck cancer: Two case reports.

Authors:  Myungsoo Kim; Ji Hyung Hong; Sang Kyu Park; Sook Jung Kim; Jung Hwi Lee; J H Byun; Yoon Ho Ko
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.