Literature DB >> 28236458

Comparison of Specific Fainting Characteristics Between Youth With Tilt-Induced Psychogenic Nonsyncopal Collapse Versus Reflex Syncope.

Geoffrey L Heyer1, Rebecca A Harvey2, Monica P Islam3.   

Abstract

Little is known about the predictive features of psychogenic nonsyncopal collapse (PNSC). The aim of the present study was to compare the self-reported fainting characteristics between young patients who were ultimately diagnosed with PNSC with those ultimately diagnosed with neurally mediated syncope and to determine which features were predictive of either diagnosis. A prospective study was conducted of sequential patients referred for fainting. All study data were obtained before testing or diagnosis. Several fainting characteristics were compared between cohorts including numbers of lifetime fainting episodes, fainting frequency the week before evaluation, fainting duration, numbers of fainting spells in a single day, presence of presyncope, types of prodromal symptoms, tearfulness with fainting, and the numbers of emergency department visits and hospital admission for fainting. During the study period, 52 patients were diagnosed with PNSC, producing a diagnostic rate of 18.9%. In univariate analyses, multiple features differed between patients with PNSC and those with syncope. After controlling for age and gender in a multivariate analysis, each of the following predicted PNSC: ≥20 lifetime fainting spells (p = 0.005), ≥2 fainting spells in a single day (p = 0.03), self-reported loss of consciousness ≥2 minutes (p = 0.01), and tearfulness associated with fainting (p = 0.022). Two or more typical prodromal symptoms (p = 0.004) predicted syncope. In conclusion, several characteristics related to fainting have predictive value in distinguishing PNSC from syncope, particularly among youth. Assessing these clinical features can help to inform appropriate testing and accurate diagnosis among patients who faint.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28236458     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Differential Diagnostic Models Between Vasovagal Syncope and Psychogenic Pseudosyncope in Children.

Authors:  Zhening Zhang; Xingyuan Jiang; Lu Han; Selena Chen; Ling Tao; Chunyan Tao; Hong Tian; Junbao Du
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Differential Diagnosis Between Psychogenic Pseudosyncope and Vasovagal Syncope in Children: A Quantitative Scoring Model Based on Clinical Manifestations.

Authors:  Changjian Li; Yong Zhang; Ying Liao; Lu Han; Qingyou Zhang; Jia Fu; Dan Zhou; Shuai Long; Hong Tian; Hongfang Jin; Junbao Du
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-27

3.  Psychogenic Pseudosyncope: Real or Imaginary? Results from a Case-Control Study in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Patients.

Authors:  C Linda M C van Campen; Frans C Visser
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.