Edoardo Picetti1, Maria Luisa Caspani2, Corrado Iaccarino3, Giulia Pastorello3, Pierpaolo Salsi4, Edoardo Viaroli3, Franco Servadei3. 1. I Servizio Anestesia Rianimazione, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy. edoardopicetti@hotmail.com. 2. I Servizio Anestesia Rianimazione, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy. 3. Neurochirugia e Neurotraumatologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma and Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, Parma and Reggio Emilia, Italy. 4. Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring represents an important tool in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although current information exists regarding ICP monitoring in secondary decompressive craniectomy (DC), little is known after primary DC following emergency hematoma evacuation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for TBI and ICP monitoring after primary DC. Exclusion criteria were ICU length of stay (LOS) <1 day and pregnancy. Major objectives were: (1) to analyze changes in ICP/cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) after primary DC, (2) to evaluate the relationship between ICP/CPP and neurological outcome and (3) to characterize and evaluate ICP-driven therapies after DC. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. Over 308 days of ICP/CPP monitoring, 130 days with at least one episode of intracranial hypertension (26 patients, 76.5%) and 57 days with at least one episode of CPP <60 mmHg (22 patients, 64.7%) were recorded. A statistically significant relationship was discovered between the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores and mean post-decompression ICP (p < 0.04) and between GOS and CPP minimum (CPPmin) (p < 0.04). After DC, persisting intracranial hypertension was treated with: barbiturate coma (n = 7, 20.6%), external ventricular drain (EVD) (n = 4, 11.8%), DC diameter widening (n = 1, 2.9%) and removal of newly formed hematomas (n = 3, 8.8%). CONCLUSION: Intracranial hypertension and/or low CPP occurs frequently after primary DC; their occurence is associated with an unfavorable neurological outcome. ICP monitoring appears useful in guiding therapy after primary DC.
BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring represents an important tool in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although current information exists regarding ICP monitoring in secondary decompressive craniectomy (DC), little is known after primary DC following emergency hematoma evacuation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for TBI and ICP monitoring after primary DC. Exclusion criteria were ICU length of stay (LOS) <1 day and pregnancy. Major objectives were: (1) to analyze changes in ICP/cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) after primary DC, (2) to evaluate the relationship between ICP/CPP and neurological outcome and (3) to characterize and evaluate ICP-driven therapies after DC. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. Over 308 days of ICP/CPP monitoring, 130 days with at least one episode of intracranial hypertension (26 patients, 76.5%) and 57 days with at least one episode of CPP <60 mmHg (22 patients, 64.7%) were recorded. A statistically significant relationship was discovered between the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores and mean post-decompression ICP (p < 0.04) and between GOS and CPP minimum (CPPmin) (p < 0.04). After DC, persisting intracranial hypertension was treated with: barbituratecoma (n = 7, 20.6%), external ventricular drain (EVD) (n = 4, 11.8%), DC diameter widening (n = 1, 2.9%) and removal of newly formed hematomas (n = 3, 8.8%). CONCLUSION:Intracranial hypertension and/or low CPP occurs frequently after primary DC; their occurence is associated with an unfavorable neurological outcome. ICP monitoring appears useful in guiding therapy after primary DC.
Authors: Peter J Hutchinson; Angelos G Kolias; Tamara Tajsic; Amos Adeleye; Abenezer Tirsit Aklilu; Tedy Apriawan; Abdul Hafid Bajamal; Ernest J Barthélemy; B Indira Devi; Dhananjaya Bhat; Diederik Bulters; Randall Chesnut; Giuseppe Citerio; D Jamie Cooper; Marek Czosnyka; Idara Edem; Nasser M F El-Ghandour; Anthony Figaji; Kostas N Fountas; Clare Gallagher; Gregory W J Hawryluk; Corrado Iaccarino; Mathew Joseph; Tariq Khan; Tsegazeab Laeke; Oleg Levchenko; Baiyun Liu; Weiming Liu; Andrew Maas; Geoffrey T Manley; Paul Manson; Anna T Mazzeo; David K Menon; Daniel B Michael; Susanne Muehlschlegel; David O Okonkwo; Kee B Park; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Gail Rosseau; Andres M Rubiano; Hamisi K Shabani; Nino Stocchetti; Shelly D Timmons; Ivan Timofeev; Chris Uff; Jamie S Ullman; Alex Valadka; Vicknes Waran; Adam Wells; Mark H Wilson; Franco Servadei Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 2.216