Literature DB >> 28235906

Speed-dependent modulation of wing muscle recruitment intensity and kinematics in two bat species.

Nicolai Konow1, Jorn A Cheney2, Thomas J Roberts2, Jose Iriarte-Díaz3, Kenneth S Breuer2,4, J Rhea S Waldman2,5, Sharon M Swartz2,4.   

Abstract

Animals respond to changes in power requirements during locomotion by modulating the intensity of recruitment of their propulsive musculature, but many questions concerning how muscle recruitment varies with speed across modes of locomotion remain unanswered. We measured normalized average burst EMG (aEMG) for pectoralis major and biceps brachii at different flight speeds in two relatively distantly related bat species: the aerial insectivore Eptesicus fuscus, and the primarily fruit-eating Carollia perspicillata These ecologically distinct species employ different flight behaviors but possess similar wing aspect ratio, wing loading and body mass. Because propulsive requirements usually correlate with body size, and aEMG likely reflects force, we hypothesized that these species would deploy similar speed-dependent aEMG modulation. Instead, we found that aEMG was speed independent in E. fuscus and modulated in a U-shaped or linearly increasing relationship with speed in C. perspicillata This interspecific difference may be related to differences in muscle fiber type composition and/or overall patterns of recruitment of the large ensemble of muscles that participate in actuating the highly articulated bat wing. We also found interspecific differences in the speed dependence of 3D wing kinematics: E. fuscus modulates wing flexion during upstroke significantly more than C. perspicillata Overall, we observed two different strategies to increase flight speed: C. perspicillata tends to modulate aEMG, and E. fuscus tends to modulate wing kinematics. These strategies may reflect different requirements for avoiding negative lift and overcoming drag during slow and fast flight, respectively, a subject we suggest merits further study.
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lifting surface; Locomotor performance; Movement economy; Muscle activity; Wing morphing; Wings

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28235906     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.144550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Warm bodies, cool wings: regional heterothermy in flying bats.

Authors:  Andrea D Rummel; Sharon M Swartz; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Turning-ascending flight of a Hipposideros pratti bat.

Authors:  Aevelina Rahman; Peter Windes; Danesh Tafti
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  A proximal-distal difference in bat wing muscle thermal sensitivity parallels a difference in operating temperatures along the wing.

Authors:  Andrea D Rummel; Sharon M Swartz; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Avoidance of non-localizable obstacles in echolocating bats: A robotic model.

Authors:  Carl Bou Mansour; Elijah Koreman; Jan Steckel; Herbert Peremans; Dieter Vanderelst
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Bats actively modulate membrane compliance to control camber and reduce drag.

Authors:  Jorn A Cheney; Jeremy C Rehm; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.308

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.