Literature DB >> 2823588

Dose administration of gadolinium-DTPA in MR imaging of intracranial tumors.

H P Niendorf1, M Laniado, W Semmler, W Schörner, R Felix.   

Abstract

Eleven patients with intracranial tumors were investigated with MR imaging at different dose levels of gadolinium-DTPA to determine a safe and effective dose for imaging intracranial tumors. The patients were divided into two groups. Baseline spin-echo images were obtained with a repetition time of 800 msec and an echo time of 35 msec, and a total of 0.1 mmol of gadolinium-DTPA/kg (six patients) or 0.2 mmol gadolinium-DTPA/kg (five patients) was injected according to a fractionated incremental dose regime (0.025, 0.025, and 0.05 mmol/kg and 0.05, 0.05, and 0.1 mmol/kg, respectively). Postcontrast MR was performed after each injection. In group 1 the best visualization was achieved after the third injection in four cases. In one glioblastoma and in a pituitary adenoma tumor margins were well defined at lower dose levels. In group 2, with five patients, the total dose of 0.2 mmol of gadolinium-DTPA/kg (0.05, 0.05, and 0.1) significantly improved tumor visualization after the third injection in only one patient with multiple metastases. No short-term side effects were encountered. In a range of parameters measured in both serum and whole blood, slight transient elevation of serum iron levels was the only appreciable change. As a result of our investigation we conclude that 0.1 mmol of gadolinium-DTPA/kg is a safe and suitable dose for brain-tumor imaging. In selected cases of 0.2 mmol/kg may increase the diagnostic yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2823588      PMCID: PMC8334493     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  17 in total

1.  New applications of MR contrast agents in neuroradiology.

Authors:  G Sze
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in Cushing's disease.

Authors:  Giovanni Vitale; Fabio Tortora; Roberto Baldelli; Francesco Cocchiara; Rosa Maria Paragliola; Emilia Sbardella; Chiara Simeoli; Ferdinando Caranci; Rosario Pivonello; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  High-dose contrast-enhanced MRI in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  T Koudriavtseva; C Pozzilli; C Di Biasi; M Iannilli; G Trasimeni; C Gasperini; C Argentino; G F Gualdi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  [Towards more precision in the therapy of brain tumors. Possibilities and limits of MRI].

Authors:  A Radbruch; E Hattingen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Evaluation of contrast and denoising effects related to imaging parameters of compressed sensitivity encoding in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yasuo Takatsu; Masafumi Nakamura; Takanobu Yamashiro; Atsushi Ikemoto; Satoshi Sawa; Masanobu Nakamura; Tosiaki Miyati
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-04-02

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance in diseases of the nervous system.

Authors:  B E Kendall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Pros and cons of current brain tumor imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Patrick Y Wen; Martin J van den Bent; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  How treatment monitoring is influencing treatment decisions in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Martha R Neagu; Raymond Y Huang; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Time-delayed contrast-enhanced MRI improves detection of brain metastases: a prospective validation of diagnostic yield.

Authors:  Or Cohen-Inbar; Zhiyuan Xu; Blair Dodson; Tanvir Rizvi; Christopher R Durst; Sugoto Mukherjee; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Factors affecting perceived tumor volumes in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R L Galloway; R J Maciunas; A L Failinger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.