Rachel Winch1, Martin McColgan1, Neena Modi1,2, Anne Greenough1,3,4. 1. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, RCPCH, London, UK. 2. Neonatal Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK. 3. Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, MRC-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, King's College London, London, UK. 4. NIHR Biomedical Centre at Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify whether there have been changes over time in the capacity of paediatric consultants to undertake research and if the activity differs between men and women. DESIGN: Comparison of data from two surveys of UK paediatric consultants. SUBJECTS: UK consultant members of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. INTERVENTIONS: Surveys carried out in 2011 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of consultants with allocated time in job plans for research, academic appointments, postgraduate qualifications, publications, grant funding and supervision of PhD students. RESULTS: The 2015 survey demonstrated 20% of consultants had one or more programmed activities (PAs) for research, but the average paid PA for research was 0.39 PA. Between the surveys, the proportion of consultants with honorary contracts had declined, and the proportion with a PhD or MDRes was 32% in 2011 compared with 26% in 2015 (p<0.001). In 2015, only 12% of consultants had at least one current grant. In 2011 and 2015, 51% and 54% respectively of consultants had not authored a publication in the preceding 2 years. In 2015, 92% of consultants were not currently supervising a PhD student, and 88% had never supervised a PhD student. In 2015, 25% of men and 12% of women had PAs for research (p<0.001). Women were less likely to hold an honorary or primary academic contract, have authored a publication or supervised a PhD student (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Research activity among paediatric consultants remains low, particularly among women. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVE: To identify whether there have been changes over time in the capacity of paediatric consultants to undertake research and if the activity differs between men and women. DESIGN: Comparison of data from two surveys of UK paediatric consultants. SUBJECTS: UK consultant members of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. INTERVENTIONS: Surveys carried out in 2011 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of consultants with allocated time in job plans for research, academic appointments, postgraduate qualifications, publications, grant funding and supervision of PhD students. RESULTS: The 2015 survey demonstrated 20% of consultants had one or more programmed activities (PAs) for research, but the average paid PA for research was 0.39 PA. Between the surveys, the proportion of consultants with honorary contracts had declined, and the proportion with a PhD or MDRes was 32% in 2011 compared with 26% in 2015 (p<0.001). In 2015, only 12% of consultants had at least one current grant. In 2011 and 2015, 51% and 54% respectively of consultants had not authored a publication in the preceding 2 years. In 2015, 92% of consultants were not currently supervising a PhD student, and 88% had never supervised a PhD student. In 2015, 25% of men and 12% of women had PAs for research (p<0.001). Women were less likely to hold an honorary or primary academic contract, have authored a publication or supervised a PhD student (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Research activity among paediatric consultants remains low, particularly among women. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child Health; Consultant; Paediatrics; Research