Athanasios Tsalatsanis1, Iztok Hozo2, Benjamin Djulbegovic3. 1. USF Health Program for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Division for Evidence-based Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, USA. 2. Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Gary, IN 46408, USA. 3. USF Health Program for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Division for Evidence-based Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, USA; Departments of Hematology and Health Outcome Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, USA; Tampa General Hospital, USA. Electronic address: bdjulbeg@health.usf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The acceptable regret model postulates that under some circumstances decision-makers may tolerate wrong decisions. The purpose of this work is to empirically evaluate the acceptable regret model of decision-making in the end-of-life care setting, where terminally ill patients consider seeking curative treatment versus accepting hospice/palliative care. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 48 terminally ill patients to assess their preferences about end-of-life treatment choices. We first elicited the patient's regret of potentially wrong choices with regards to the recommended management and provided information on life expectancy estimated by two prognostication models. We then elicited the patients' level of acceptable regret by assessing their tolerance for potentially wrongly accepting hospice care versus continuing unnecessary treatment. Using the levels of acceptable regret, we computed: (1) the probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care and (2) the probability of death below which the patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment. We also assessed patients' understanding of the interview questions using a 7-point Likert scale. RESULTS: We found that the median probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care was 96% (95% CI 94-98%), whereas the median probability of death below which a patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment was 2.5% (95% CI 0.3-5%). We also found that the levels of acceptable regret measured for wrong hospice referral (mean = 1.52; SD = 2.26; min = 0; max = 7.72) were similar to the levels of acceptable regret measured for unnecessary treatment (mean = 2.10; SD = 4.33; min = 0; max = 23) (KW test; p = 0.68) indicating that acceptable regret levels for either of the wrong decisions is felt similarly. The results were independent of the estimated probability of death communicated to patients before the acceptable regret interview. CONCLUSIONS: We have elicited empirical data that corroborated the acceptable regret hypothesis. The requirement for high level of certainty before accepting recommended management may explain the difficulties related to decision-making in the end-of-life setting.
BACKGROUND: The acceptable regret model postulates that under some circumstances decision-makers may tolerate wrong decisions. The purpose of this work is to empirically evaluate the acceptable regret model of decision-making in the end-of-life care setting, where terminally ill patients consider seeking curative treatment versus accepting hospice/palliative care. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 48 terminally ill patients to assess their preferences about end-of-life treatment choices. We first elicited the patient's regret of potentially wrong choices with regards to the recommended management and provided information on life expectancy estimated by two prognostication models. We then elicited the patients' level of acceptable regret by assessing their tolerance for potentially wrongly accepting hospice care versus continuing unnecessary treatment. Using the levels of acceptable regret, we computed: (1) the probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care and (2) the probability of death below which the patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment. We also assessed patients' understanding of the interview questions using a 7-point Likert scale. RESULTS: We found that the median probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care was 96% (95% CI 94-98%), whereas the median probability of death below which a patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment was 2.5% (95% CI 0.3-5%). We also found that the levels of acceptable regret measured for wrong hospice referral (mean = 1.52; SD = 2.26; min = 0; max = 7.72) were similar to the levels of acceptable regret measured for unnecessary treatment (mean = 2.10; SD = 4.33; min = 0; max = 23) (KW test; p = 0.68) indicating that acceptable regret levels for either of the wrong decisions is felt similarly. The results were independent of the estimated probability of death communicated to patients before the acceptable regret interview. CONCLUSIONS: We have elicited empirical data that corroborated the acceptable regret hypothesis. The requirement for high level of certainty before accepting recommended management may explain the difficulties related to decision-making in the end-of-life setting.
Authors: My-Trang T Dang; Zohair Ahmed; Jason M Betcher; Saloni Kadakia; Samuel J Wisniewski; John W Sealey Journal: Spartan Med Res J Date: 2019-07-01