| Literature DB >> 28235412 |
Hoon Jang1, Woong Jin Bae2, Su Jin Kim1, Hyuk Jin Cho1, Seung Mo Yuk1, Dong Seok Han1, Chang Shik Youn1, Eun Bi Kwon3, Sung Yeoun Hwang3, Sae Woong Kim4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypercholesterolaemia (HC) is a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease and is also known to be a risk factor for erectile dysfunction (ED). ED caused by HC is thought to be related to HC-induced oxidative stress damage in the vascular endothelium and erectile tissue. KH-204 is an herbal formula with a strong antioxidant effect. We evaluated the effects of KH-204 on erectile function in a rat model of HC-induced ED.Entities:
Keywords: Erectile dysfunction; Hypercholesterolaemia; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28235412 PMCID: PMC5324223 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1588-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Marker compound and chemical structure in each plant
| Plant source | Marker compound | Chemical structure |
|---|---|---|
|
| Loganin |
|
|
| Betain |
|
|
| Ellagic acid |
|
|
| Hyperoside |
|
|
| Schisandrin |
|
Fig. 1HPLC chromatogram of each plant. a Loganin is the marker compound of Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc. b Betain is the marker compound of Lycium chinense Miller. c Ellagic acid is the marker compound of Rubus coreanus Miquel. d Hyperoside is the marker compound of Cuscuta chinensis Lam. e Schizandrin is the marker compound of Schisandra chinensis Baillon
Composition of the high fat and cholesterol diet
| Formulation | High Fat and Cholesterol Diet |
| (gm%) | |
| Protein | 24 |
| Carbohydrate | 41 |
| Fat | 24 |
| Ingredient | g |
| Casein (from milk) | 233.1 |
| Corn Starch | 84.8 |
| Sucrose | 201.4 |
| Dextrose | 116.5 |
| Cellulose | 58.3 |
| Soybean Oil | 29.1 |
| Lard | 206.9 |
| Mineral mixture | 52.4 |
| Vitamin mixture | 11.7 |
| TBHQ | 0.0 |
| L-Cysteine | 3.5 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.3 |
| Total | 1,000.0 |
| Cholesterol | 20 |
| Cholic acid | 5 |
HFD high-fat diet, TBHQ tertiary-butylhydroquinone
Body weight gain, lipid profiles, and oxidative stress in each group
| Control | HFC | HFC + KH |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body Weight Gain (%) | 222.57 ± 17.81 | 255.40 ± 25.94 | 236.17 ± 20.15 | 0.008a
|
| Lipid Profiles | ||||
| Total Cholesterol (μM) | 91.71 ± 6.68 | 168.77 ± 26.66 | 127.83 ± 8.83 | <0.001a
|
| LDL/VLDL-Cholesterol (μM) | 47.65 ± 5.45 | 134.66 ± 27.28 | 87.27 ± 7.54 | <0.001a
|
| HDL-Cholesterol (μM) | 44.06 ± 2.40 | 34.12 ± 2.83 | 40.56 ± 2.83 | <0.001a
|
| Triglyceride (mM) | 1.14 ± 0.16 | 2.76 ± 0.19 | 1.76 ± 0.27 | <0.001a
|
| 8-OHdG (ng/mL) | 2.88 ± 1.03 | 10.57 ± 1.42 | 6.06 ± 1.16 | <0.001a
|
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. HFC high fat and cholesterol diet, KH KH-204, LDL low density lipoprotein, VLDL very low density lipoprotein, HDL high density lipoprotein, 8-OHdG 8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine
aOne-way ANOVA test, overall comparison
bComparison between the control and HFC groups
cComparison between the HFC and HFC + KH groups
Intracavernous pressure (ICP) in response to electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve in rats from each experimental group
| Control | HFC | HFC + KH |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak ICP | 105.86 ± 10.38 | 28.29 ± 8.69 | 78.75 ± 30.56 | <0.001a
|
| ICP/MAP ratio | 0.83 ± 0.12 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.25 | <0.001a
|
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
aOne-way ANOVA test, overall comparison
bComparison between the control and HFC groups
cComparison between the HFC and HFC + KH groups
Fig. 2Masson’s trichrome staining of corpora tissue. a, b, c Masson’s trichrome staining of corpora tissue: smooth muscle is shown in red (white arrow) and collagen is shown in green (Magnification: x200). d Ratio of smooth muscle and collagen fibres in corpora tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). * = Significant difference between the control and high fat and cholesterol diet (HFC) groups. ** = Significant difference between the HFC and HFC + KH groups
Fig. 3Phosphorylated-endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) protein expression in corpora tissue. a Western blot analysis of P-eNOS and eNOS in corporal tissue. b Densitometric analysis of P-eNOS relative to eNOS. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * = Significant difference between the control and high fat and high cholesterol diet (HFC) groups. ** = Significant difference between the HFC and HFC + KH groups
Fig. 4Immunostaining of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the dorsal penile nerve. a, b, c Immunostaining for nNOS (red - white arrow) and β-III tubulin (green) in the dorsal penile nerve. Magnification: x400. d Mean intensity of nNOS expression for the dorsal penile nerve cross section. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * Significant difference between the control and high fat and cholesterol diet (HFC) groups. ** Significant difference between the HFC and HFC + KH groups