| Literature DB >> 28235377 |
Tetiana Tatarchuk1, Mohamed Bououdina2, Wojciech Macyk3, Olexander Shyichuk4, Natalia Paliychuk5, Ivan Yaremiy6, Basma Al-Najar2, Michał Pacia3.
Abstract
The effect of Zn-doping inEntities:
Keywords: Energy band gap; Ferromagnetism; Nanoparticles; Spinel ferrite; Vibrational modes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28235377 PMCID: PMC5319947 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-1899-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1The X-ray diffraction patterns of the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 as function of Zn2+ content
Chemical composition, lattice parameter a exp, crystallite size D, and band gap of the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 spinels
|
| Chemical composition |
| Crystallite size | Band gap (eV) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scherrer method | W-H method | SSP method | TEM | ||||
| 0.00 | CoFe2O4 | 8.3536 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 51 | 1.17 |
| 0.10 | Zn0.1Co0.9Fe2O4 | 8.3794 | 36 | 42 | 31 | 46 | 1.30 |
| 0.20 | Zn0.2Co0.8Fe2O4 | 8.3897 | 51 | 49 | 38 | 53 | 1.28 |
| 0.30 | Zn0.3Co0.7Fe2O4 | 8.3982 | 54 | 54 | 43 | 55 | 1.34 |
| 0.40 | Zn0.4Co0.6Fe2O4 | 8.4016 | 55 | 56 | 47 | 69 | 1.32 |
| 0.50 | Zn0.5Co0.5Fe2O4 | 8.4068 | 53 | 58 | 46 | 77 | 1.31 |
Fig. 2Scherrer plot (a), W-H analysis (b), and SSP plot (c) of Co1−xZnxFe2O4 ferrites
Ionic packing coefficient P a, P b, fulfillment coefficient α, and vacancy parameter β for the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 ferrites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.4367 | 0.7037 | 0.387 | 0.338 | 0.649 | 2.119 |
| 0.10 | 0.4843 | 0.6859 | 0.368 | 0.332 | 0.642 | 1.329 |
| 0.20 | 0.4890 | 0.6870 | 0.368 | 0.332 | 0.640 | 1.090 |
| 0.30 | 0.4848 | 0.6927 | 0.371 | 0.334 | 0.639 | 0.913 |
| 0.40 | 0.4869 | 0.6928 | 0.371 | 0.334 | 0.638 | 0.916 |
| 0.50 | 0.4960 | 0.6894 | 0.367 | 0.333 | 0.637 | 0.853 |
Fig. 3The ionic packing coefficient Pa and Pb versus Zn(x) for the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 ferrites
Fig. 4The fulfillment coefficient α and vacancy parameter β versus Zn(x) for the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 ferrites
Fig. 5The SEM images and particle size distribution (obtained from TEM) for the samples with x = 0.2 and x = 0.5 for the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 spinels
EDS data for the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 spinels
| Zn2+ content | Elements (at. %) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical (expected) | Experimental (actual) | |||||||||
| Co | Zn | Fe | O | Total | Co | Zn | Fe | O | Total | |
| 0.00 | 14.29 | – | 28.57 | 57.14 | 100 | 14.15 | – | 28.68 | 57.17 | 100 |
| 0.10 | 12.86 | 1.43 | 28.57 | 57.14 | 100 | 12.71 | 2.01 | 28.22 | 57.06 | 100 |
| 0.20 | 11.43 | 2.86 | 28.57 | 57.14 | 100 | 11.54 | 3.13 | 28.26 | 57.07 | 100 |
| 0.30 | 10.00 | 4.29 | 28.57 | 57.14 | 100 | 10.90 | 4.48 | 27.70 | 56.92 | 100 |
| 0.40 | 8.57 | 5.71 | 28.57 | 57.14 | 100 | 8.80 | 5.79 | 28.33 | 57.08 | 100 |
| 0.50 | 7.14 | 7.14 | 28.57 | 57.14 | 100 | 6.92 | 7.87 | 28.17 | 57.04 | 100 |
Fig. 6EDS spectra of Zn0.1Co0.9Fe2O4
Fig. 7FTIR spectra of Co1−xZnxFe2O4 ferrites
FTIR parameters, the Debye temperature θ , elastic moduli for the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 spinels
| Zn2+ content ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 154.59 | 649.2 | 149.11 | 58.85 | 106.59 | 0.27 |
| 0.10 | 155.10 | 650.3 | 149.79 | 59.21 | 106.15 | 0.26 |
| 0.20 | 153.35 | 646.1 | 153.78 | 61.77 | 100.43 | 0.24 |
| 0.30 | 153.32 | 646.1 | 149.71 | 59.49 | 103.25 | 0.26 |
| 0.40 | 153.43 | 646.1 | 160.37 | 65.82 | 94.86 | 0.22 |
| 0.50 | 152.58 | 644.0 | 165.47 | 69.57 | 88.73 | 0.19 |
Fig. 8Variation of Young’s modulus (E), rigidity modulus (G), and bulk modulus (B) with Zn content (x) in the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 system
Fig. 9UV–vis spectra presented as the Kubelka-Munk function for ZnxCo1−xFe2O4 system as a function of Zn content
Fig. 10Tauc plot for indirect band gap CoFe2O4
Fig. 11Band gap energy of ZnxCo1−xFe2O4 system as a function of Zn content (error ±0.03 eV)
Fig. 12Saturation magnetization (Ms) versus applied magnetic field (H) of the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 samples at room temperature (Inset low field region of the loops)
Magnetic parameters (saturation magnetization Ms, remanent magnetization Mr, coercitivity HC) at room temperature of Co1−xZnxFe2O4 system as function of Zn content (x)
|
|
| Ms (emu/g) | Mr (emu/g) | HC (Oe) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 51 | 91 | 44 | 1382 |
| 0.1 | 46 | 105 | 38 | 628 |
| 0.2 | 53 | 114 | 36 | 377 |
| 0.3 | 55 | 100 | 19 | 188 |
| 0.4 | 69 | 102 | 18 | 119 |
| 0.5 | 77 | 82 | 10 | 75 |
Fig. 13Variation of the saturation magnetization (Ms) of the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) system versus Zn content
Fig. 14Variation of the remanent magnetization (Mr) and coercivity (HC) of the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) system versus Zn content
Fig. 15Variation of the remanent magnetization (Mr) and coercivity (HC) of the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) system versus crystallite size (from TEM)