| Literature DB >> 28234500 |
Johannes Handsteiner1, Andrew S Friedman2, Dominik Rauch1, Jason Gallicchio3, Bo Liu1,4, Hannes Hosp1, Johannes Kofler5, David Bricher1, Matthias Fink1, Calvin Leung3, Anthony Mark2, Hien T Nguyen6, Isabella Sanders2, Fabian Steinlechner1, Rupert Ursin1,7, Sören Wengerowsky1, Alan H Guth2, David I Kaiser2, Thomas Scheidl1, Anton Zeilinger1,7.
Abstract
Bell's theorem states that some predictions of quantum mechanics cannot be reproduced by a local-realist theory. That conflict is expressed by Bell's inequality, which is usually derived under the assumption that there are no statistical correlations between the choices of measurement settings and anything else that can causally affect the measurement outcomes. In previous experiments, this "freedom of choice" was addressed by ensuring that selection of measurement settings via conventional "quantum random number generators" was spacelike separated from the entangled particle creation. This, however, left open the possibility that an unknown cause affected both the setting choices and measurement outcomes as recently as mere microseconds before each experimental trial. Here we report on a new experimental test of Bell's inequality that, for the first time, uses distant astronomical sources as "cosmic setting generators." In our tests with polarization-entangled photons, measurement settings were chosen using real-time observations of Milky Way stars while simultaneously ensuring locality. Assuming fair sampling for all detected photons, and that each stellar photon's color was set at emission, we observe statistically significant ≳7.31σ and ≳11.93σ violations of Bell's inequality with estimated p values of ≲1.8×10^{-13} and ≲4.0×10^{-33}, respectively, thereby pushing back by ∼600 years the most recent time by which any local-realist influences could have engineered the observed Bell violation.Year: 2017 PMID: 28234500 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.060401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phys Rev Lett ISSN: 0031-9007 Impact factor: 9.161