Literature DB >> 28234344

Mutational landscape reflects the biological continuum of plasma cell dyscrasias.

A Rossi1,2, M Voigtlaender1, S Janjetovic1, B Thiele1, M Alawi3,4, M März1, A Brandt1, T Hansen1, J Radloff1, G Schön5, U Hegenbart6, S Schönland6, C Langer7, C Bokemeyer1, M Binder1.   

Abstract

We subjected 90 patients covering a biological spectrum of plasma cell dyscrasias (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and multiple myeloma) to next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panel analysis on unsorted bone marrow. A total of 64 different mutations in 8 genes were identified in this cohort. NRAS (28.1%), KRAS (21.3%), TP53 (19.5%), BRAF (19.1%) and CCND1 (8.9%) were the most commonly mutated genes in all patients. Patients with non-myeloma plasma cell dyscrasias showed a significantly lower mutational load than myeloma patients (0.91±0.30 vs 2.07±0.29 mutations per case, P=0.008). KRAS and NRAS exon 3 mutations were significantly associated with the myeloma cohort compared with non-myeloma plasma cell dyscrasias (odds ratio (OR) 9.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-90.72, P=0.043 and OR 7.03, 95% CI 1.49-33.26, P=0.014). NRAS exon 3 and TP53 exon 6 mutations were significantly associated with del17p cytogenetics (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.87, P=0.036 and OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.54, P=0.013). Our data show that the mutational landscape reflects the biological continuum of plasma cell dyscrasias from a low-complexity mutational pattern in MGUS and AL amyloidosis to a high-complexity pattern in multiple myeloma. Our targeted NGS approach allows resource-efficient, sensitive and scalable mutation analysis for prognostic, predictive or therapeutic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28234344      PMCID: PMC5386334          DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


  33 in total

1.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Gene mapping and expression analysis of 16q loss of heterozygosity identifies WWOX and CYLD as being important in determining clinical outcome in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Matthew W Jenner; Paola E Leone; Brian A Walker; Fiona M Ross; David C Johnson; David Gonzalez; Laura Chiecchio; Elisabet Dachs Cabanas; Gian Paolo Dagrada; Mathew Nightingale; Rebecca K M Protheroe; David Stockley; Monica Else; Nicholas J Dickens; Nicholas C P Cross; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; Kenneth Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Vemurafenib response in 2 patients with posttransplant refractory BRAF V600E-mutated multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J P Sharman; J Chmielecki; D Morosini; G A Palmer; J S Ross; P J Stephens; J Stafl; V A Miller; S M Ali
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-06-11

Review 5.  Amyloidosis: pathogenesis and new therapeutic options.

Authors:  Giampaolo Merlini; David C Seldin; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Monitoring bortezomib therapy in multiple myeloma: screening of cyclin D1, D2, and D3 via reliable real-time polymerase chain reaction and association with clinico-pathological features and outcome.

Authors:  Ba Thanh-Truc Ngo; Julia Felthaus; Manuel Hein; Marie Follo; Dagmar Wider; Gabriele Ihorst; Monika Engelhardt; Ralph Wäsch
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2010-09

7.  Burden of cytogenetically abnormal plasma cells in light chain amyloidosis and their prognostic relevance.

Authors:  Seon Young Kim; Kyongok Im; Si Nae Park; Jung-Ah Kim; Sung-Soo Yoon; Dong Soon Lee
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.156

8.  Targeting the BRAF V600E mutation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Mindaugas Andrulis; Nicola Lehners; David Capper; Roland Penzel; Christoph Heining; Jennifer Huellein; Thorsten Zenz; Andreas von Deimling; Peter Schirmacher; Anthony D Ho; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Kai Neben; Marc S Raab
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 9.  p53 abnormalities and potential therapeutic targeting in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P J Teoh; W J Chng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Molecular spectrum of BRAF, NRAS and KRAS gene mutations in plasma cell dyscrasias: implication for MEK-ERK pathway activation.

Authors:  Marta Lionetti; Marzia Barbieri; Katia Todoerti; Luca Agnelli; Simona Marzorati; Sonia Fabris; Gabriella Ciceri; Serena Galletti; Giulia Milesi; Martina Manzoni; Mara Mazzoni; Angela Greco; Giovanni Tonon; Pellegrino Musto; Luca Baldini; Antonino Neri
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-15
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  AL amyloidosis: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapies.

Authors:  Giampaolo Merlini
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

2.  The Dynamics of Nucleotide Variants in the Progression from Low-Intermediate Myeloma Precursor Conditions to Multiple Myeloma: Studying Serial Samples with a Targeted Sequencing Approach.

Authors:  Bénedith Oben; Charlotte Cosemans; Ellen Geerdens; Loes Linsen; Kimberly Vanhees; Brigitte Maes; Koen Theunissen; Bert Cruys; Marta Lionetti; Ingrid Arijs; Niccolò Bolli; Guy Froyen; Jean-Luc Rummens
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Coagulation and fibrinolytic features in AL amyloidosis with abnormal bleeding and usefulness of tranexamic acid.

Authors:  Masahisa Arahata; Hiroyuki Takamatsu; Eriko Morishita; Yasuko Kadohira; Shinya Yamada; Akitada Ichinose; Hidesaku Asakura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Decitabine and Melphalan Fail to Reactivate p73 in p53 Deficient Myeloma Cells.

Authors:  Pierre-Samuel Gillardin; Géraldine Descamps; Sophie Maiga; Benoit Tessoulin; Hanane Djamai; Benedetta Lucani; David Chiron; Philippe Moreau; Steven Le Gouill; Martine Amiot; Catherine Pellat-Deceunynck; Agnès Moreau-Aubry
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis in plasmablastic lymphoma identifies disruption of key regulatory pathways.

Authors:  Hanno M Witte; Axel Künstner; Nadine Hertel; Heinz-Wolfram Bernd; Veronica Bernard; Stephanie Stölting; Hartmut Merz; Nikolas von Bubnoff; Hauke Busch; Alfred C Feller; Niklas Gebauer
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Genetics.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Kipp W Johnson; Edward Choi; Scott Kaplin; Eric Venner; Mullai Murugan; Zhen Wang; Benjamin S Glicksberg; Christopher I Amos; Michael C Schatz; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14

7.  Liquid Biopsy-Derived DNA Sources as Tools for Comprehensive Mutation Profiling in Multiple Myeloma: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Robbe Heestermans; Wouter De Brouwer; Ken Maes; Isabelle Vande Broek; Freya Vaeyens; Catharina Olsen; Ben Caljon; Ann De Becker; Marleen Bakkus; Rik Schots; Ivan Van Riet
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Correlation of plasma cell assessment by phenotypic methods and molecular profiles by NGS in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias.

Authors:  Ekaterina Rebmann Chigrinova; Naomi A Porret; Thomas Pabst; Ulrike Bacher; Martin Andres; Gertrud Wiedemann; Yara Banz; Myriam Legros; Matthias Pollak; Elisabeth Oppliger Leibundgut
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.622

9.  High-Throughput Immunogenetics Reveals a Lack of Physiological T Cell Clusters in Patients With Autoimmune Cytopenias.

Authors:  Donjete Simnica; Simon Schliffke; Christoph Schultheiß; Nicola Bonzanni; Lorenzo F Fanchi; Nuray Akyüz; Barbara Gösch; Christian Casar; Benjamin Thiele; Janina Schlüter; Ansgar W Lohse; Mascha Binder
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.