Literature DB >> 28234217

Intraoperative culture positive allograft bone and subsequent postoperative infections: a retrospective review.

Laura Sims1, Paul Kulyk1, Allan Woo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obtaining intraoperative cultures of allograft bone just before use in orthopedic procedures is standard practice in many centres; however, the association between positive cultures and subsequent surgical infections is unknown. Our study had 3 goals: to determine the prevalence of positive intraoperative allograft culture and subsequent infection; to determine if, in cases of subsequent infection, organisms isolated at reoperation were the same as those cultured from the allograft at the time of the index procedure; and to assess the costs associated with performing intraoperative allograft cultures.
METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we obtained data on patients receiving allograft bone between 2009 and 2012. Patients receiving allograft with positive cultures were reviewed to identify cases of significant infection. Organisms isolated at reoperation were compared with the allograft culture taken at the time of implantation, and we performed a cost assessment.
RESULTS: Of the 996 allograft bone grafts used, 43 (4.3%) had positive intraoperative cultures and significant postoperative infections developed in 2, requiring reoperation. Antibiotics based on culture results were prescribed in 24% of cases. Organisms cultured at the time of reoperation differed from those isolated initially. The cost of performing 996 allograft cultures was $169 320.
CONCLUSION: This series suggests that rates of positive intraoperative bone allograft culture are low, and subsequent infection is rare. In cases of postoperative infection, primary allograft culture and secondary tissue cultures isolated different organisms. Costs associated with performing cultures are high. Eliminating initial culture testing could save $42 500 per year in our health region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28234217      PMCID: PMC5373722          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.008016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  25 in total

1.  Hospital-based allogenic bone bank--10-year experience.

Authors:  C-H Hou; R-S Yang; S-M Hou
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The use of allograft bone in spine surgery: is it safe?

Authors:  Thomas E Mroz; Michael J Joyce; Isador H Lieberman; Michael P Steinmetz; Edward C Benzel; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Long-term outcome of total hip replacement in patients with or without femoral head contamination.

Authors:  Talal Ibrahim; Mayyar Ghazal Aswad; Joseph J Dias; Andrew R Brown; Colin N Esler
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.118

4.  Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank.

Authors:  A G Sutherland; A Raafat; P Yates; J D Hutchison
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Microbial contamination of femoral head allografts.

Authors:  C K Chiu; P Y Lau; S W W Chan; C M Fong; L K Sun
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.227

6.  Irradiated allograft bone in spine surgery: to culture or not? A single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Jérôme Couture; François Cabana
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Incidence of infection with the use of non-irradiated morcellised allograft bone washed at the time of revision arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  F N K Kwong; T Ibrahim; R A Power
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-11

8.  Structural bone allograft fractures in oncological procedures.

Authors:  Javier Garcia-Coiradas; Roberto Garcia-Maroto; Juan Luis Cebrian; Luis Lopez-Duran
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Postoperative culture positive surgical site infections after the use of irradiated allograft, nonirradiated allograft, or autograft for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Mark M Mikhael; Paul M Huddleston; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Frozen cancellous bone allografts: positive cultures of implanted grafts in posterior fusions of the spine.

Authors:  A Barriga; P Díaz-de-Rada; J L Barroso; M Alfonso; M Lamata; S Hernáez; J L Beguiristáin; M San-Julián; C Villas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  3 in total

1.  Study of Cell Viability and Etiology of Contamination in Decalcified Bone Allograft: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Archit Jain; Saurabh Kumar; Vinod Kumar Arora; Rumpa Saha; Aditya N Aggarwal; Anil Kumar Jain
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  A novel revision system for complex pelvic defects utilizing 3D-printed custom prosthesis.

Authors:  Yongqiang Hao; Dinghao Luo; Junxiang Wu; Lei Wang; Kai Xie; Mengning Yan; Kerong Dai; Yongqiang Hao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The quality assessment of the University hospital bone bank in Central Serbia: the second audit after fourteen years.

Authors:  Stepanovic L Zeljko; Ristic M Branko
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.522

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.