| Literature DB >> 28233857 |
Zeyu Li1,2, Qiuming Gao1, Hang Zhang1, Weiqian Tian1, Yanli Tan1, Weiwei Qian1, Zhengping Liu2.
Abstract
A novel kind ofEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28233857 PMCID: PMC5324168 DOI: 10.1038/srep43352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The synthesis and configuration of Pt/N-rGO performed as the catalyst of ORR.
The Pt particles with uniformed 2.8 nm diameter and exposed (111) crystal planes anchored on the surface of N-rGO evenly. And the N works as the bridge between Pt and rGO with the Pt-N and N-C chemical bonds in Pt/N-rGO.
Figure 2Morphology and structure of GO, N-rGO and Pt/N-rGO.
SEM images of GO (a), N-rGO (b) and Pt/N-rGO (c,d). TEM (e,f), HRTEM (g) and SAED images (h) of Pt/N-rGO. And the histograms of Pt nanoparticle size distribution in (f) for Pt/N-rGO (i).
Figure 3XRD and XPS spectra of N-rGO, Pt/rGO, Pt/N-rGO and the commercial Pt/C.
(a) XRD patterns of N-rGO, Pt/rGO, Pt/N-rGO and the commercial Pt/C. XPS survey scan spectrum (b) as well as the high resolution Pt 4 f (c), N 1s (d) and C 1s core-level (e) spectra of Pt/N-rGO.
The ORR catalytic activities over the Pt/N-rGO, Pt/rGO and Pt/C samples before and after ADT of 5000 cycles measured by RDE operated in the O2 saturated 0.1 M HClO4.
| Factor of the ORR catalytic activity | Sample | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pt/N-rGO | Pt/rGO | Pt/C | |
| Eonset (mV vs Ag/AgCl) | 635.1 | 588.4 | 592.9 |
| ΔEonset (mV) | 1.7 | 39.4 | 51.1 |
| % loss of Eonset after ADT | 0.3 | 6.7 | 8.6 |
| Ehalf-wave (mV vs Ag/AgCl) | 470.1 | 440.1 | 430.3 |
| ΔEhalf-wave (mV) | 5.0 | 30.0 | 70.2 |
| % loss of Ehalf-wave after ADT | 1.1 | 6.8 | 16.3 |
| Mass activity at 0.5 V vs Ag/AgCl (mA mgPt−1) | 163.4 | 108.1 | 106.0 |
| % loss of mass activity at 0.5 V after ADT | 0.4 | 52.9 | 65.0 |
| Specific activity at 0.5 V vs Ag/AgCl (mA cm−2) | 3.73 | 2.10 | 2.20 |
| % loss of specific activity at 0.5 V after ADT | −4.3 | 48.6 | 48.6 |
Figure 4ORR polarization curves of Pt/N-rGO, Pt/rGO and Pt/C.
(a) The polarization curves of the commercial Pt/C, Pt/rGO and Pt/N-rGO at the rotating speed of 1600 rpm with the insert of the enlarged polarization curves at around the onset potentials for clarity. (b) The Tafel plots for Pt/C, Pt/rGO and Pt/N-rGO at the rotating speed of 1600 rpm. (c) The rotation rate-dependent ORR polarization curves for Pt/N-rGO. (d) The Koutecky–Levich plots from the ORR data at different potentials. (e) The peroxide yield with regard to the total oxygen reduction products and the calculated electron transfer number of Pt/C, Pt/rGO and Pt/N-rGO from RRDE in O2-saturated 0.1 M HClO4. And (f) EIS of electrodes of Pt/C, Pt/rGO and Pt/N-rGO.
Figure 5Durability test for Pt/N-rGO, Pt/rGO and Pt/C.
(a) CV curves of Pt/N-rGO, Pt/rGO and Pt/C before and after ADT of 5000 cycles in N2-saturated 0.1 M HClO4. (b) Comparative ECSA of Pt/N-rGO, Pt/rGO and Pt/C during 5000 electrochemical cycles. (c) The polarization curves of the commercial Pt/C, Pt/rGO and Pt/N-rGO before and after the ADT of 5000 cycles in O2-saturated 0.1 M HClO4with the insert of the enlarged polarization curves at around the half-wave potentials for clarity. (d) The mass activities and specific activities of the commercial Pt/C, Pt/rGO and Pt/N-rGO at 0.5 V vs Ag/AgCl. And TEM image (e) and the histograms (f) of Pt nanoparticle size distribution for Pt/N-rGO after ADT of 5000 cycles.