Literature DB >> 28233585

How oncologists' communication improves (analogue) patients' recall of information. A randomized video-vignettes study.

N M Medendorp1, L N C Visser2, M A Hillen1, J C J M de Haes1, E M A Smets1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients need information provision to cope with their disease. However, only 20-60% of information provided during consultations is remembered. This study aimed to investigate whether oncologists' use of trust-conveying communication, characterized by communicating competence, honesty and caring, enhances patients' memory. Moreover, we aimed to investigate if this hypothetical relationship is mediated by a reduction in psychophysiological arousal during the consultation.
METHODS: An experimental design was used, allowing for conclusion about causality. Two versions of a scripted video-taped consultation were used in which the oncologist adopted either a standard or a trust-conveying communication style. 97 cancer-naive individuals acted as analogue patients and were randomly assigned to watch one of the consultations.
RESULTS: Free recall, assessed 24-28h after viewing, was higher (p=0.039) in the trust-conveying condition (65.3% versus 59.5%). Recognition did not differ (p=0.502). Psychophysiological assessment during watching showed a smaller heart rate response in the trust-conveying condition (p=0.037). No mediation effect nor an effect on electrodermal activity was found.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that oncologists' use of trust-conveying communication could increase patients' free recall of information and diminish their cardiovascular response. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The underlying mechanisms by which oncologists' communication influences information recall warrants further investigation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Information recall; Memory; Oncology; Physician-patient communication; Psychophysiology; Trust; Video-vignettes design

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28233585     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  6 in total

Review 1.  Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact.

Authors:  Justin J Sanders; J Randall Curtis; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Patients' Perspectives on Trust and Trustworthiness of Health Care Organizations.

Authors:  Jessica Greene
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Studying medical communication with video vignettes: a randomized study on how variations in video-vignette introduction format and camera focus influence analogue patients' engagement.

Authors:  Leonie N C Visser; Nadine Bol; Marij A Hillen; Mathilde G E Verdam; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Julia C M van Weert; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Communicating the diagnosis of cancer or depression: Results of a randomized controlled online study using video vignettes.

Authors:  Franziska Kühne; Henriette Fauth; Destina S Ay-Bryson; Leonie N C Visser; Florian Weck
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 5.  Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.

Authors:  Philippa M Moore; Solange Rivera; Gonzalo A Bravo-Soto; Camila Olivares; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-24

6.  Fostering Patient Choice Awareness and Presenting Treatment Options Neutrally: A Randomized Trial to Assess the Effect on Perceived Room for Involvement in Decision Making.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Kim Brandes; Jessica de Graaf; Joyce E de Boer; Nanon H M Labrie; Anouk Knops; Cornelia F Allaart; Johanna E A Portielje; Willem Jan W Bos; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.583

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.