| Literature DB >> 28233464 |
K Blanco-Peña1,2, F Esperón3, A M Torres-Mejía1, A de la Torre3, E de la Cruz2, M Jiménez-Soto4.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is known to be an emerging problem, but the extent of the issue remains incomplete. The aim of this study was to determine the presence or absence of nine resistance genes (blaTEM , catI, mecA, qnrS, sulI, sulII, tet(A), tet(Q), vanA) in the faeces of 141 pigeons from four urban parks in Alajuela, Guadalupe, Tres Ríos and San José in Costa Rica. The genes were identified by real-time PCR directly from enema samples. About 30% of the samples were positive for genes catI and sulI; between 13% and 17% were positive for qnrS, sulII, tet(A) and tet(Q); and 4% were positive for blaTEM . The mecA and vanA genes were not detected. The average of antimicrobial resistance genes detected per pigeon was 2. Eight different patterns of resistance were identified, without differences in the sampling areas, being the most common pattern 2 (sulII positive samples). During rainy season, the genes more frequently found were sulI and tet(A). In conclusion, the urban inhabiting pigeons tested are currently carrying antimicrobial resistance genes, potentially acting as reservoirs of resistant bacteria and vectors to humans. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study carried out on direct detection of resistance genes in the digestive metagenomes of pigeons.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistances; Columba livia; Costa Rica; antimicrobial resistance genes; ecosystem health; urban parks
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28233464 PMCID: PMC5655739 DOI: 10.1111/zph.12340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zoonoses Public Health ISSN: 1863-1959 Impact factor: 2.702
Results obtained about the presence of ARGs in enemas from pigeons
| Location |
| β‐lactamases | Chloramphenicol | Methicillin (MRSA gene) | Fluoroquinolones | Sulphonamides | Tetracyclines | Vancomycin | ANG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |||
| San José | 41 | 9.8 | 31.7 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 39.0 | 19.5 | 22.0 | 14.6 | 0.0 | 2.46 |
| Alajuela | 29 | 0.0 | 24.1 | 0.0 | 13.8 | 48.3 | 17.2 | 3.4 | 10.3 | 0.0 | 2.17 |
| Tres Ríos | 16 | 0.0 | 31.3 | 0.0 | 18.8 | 12.5 | 31.3 | 43.8 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 2.50 |
| Guadalupe | 55 | 3.6 | 29.1 | 0.0 | 14.5 | 20.0 | 12.7 | 5.5 | 14.5 | 0.0 | 2.00 |
| Total | 141 | 4.3 | 29.1 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 30.5 | 17.7 | 14.2 | 13.5 | 0.0 | 2.23 |
*Average number of ARGs per sample.
Protocols employed: †Jiang et al. (2013), ‡Francois et al. (2003), §Marti and Balcazar (2013).
Characterization of the area within a radius of 3 km from the parks
| Park | Population living in the canton where the park is located | Human hospitals or clinics | Rivers contaminated with faecal matter |
|---|---|---|---|
| San José | 336 792 | 8 | 2 |
| Guadalupe | 133 557 | 5 | 1 |
| Alajuela | 297 879 | 2 | 2 |
| Tres Rios | 107 755 | 1 | 2 |
*National Institute of Statistics and Censuses of Costa Rica, INEC (2012).
Patterns of resistance obtained in the enema samples by k‐means clustering
| Cluster | Resistance pattern | Location | No. samples included in the pattern / No. total samples (%) | Multiresistant microbiomes (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No resistance | Alajuela | 9/29 (31.0) | 0 (0) |
| Guadalupe | 13/55 (23.6) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 9/41 (22.0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 2/16 (12.5) | 0 (0) | ||
| Total | 33/141 (23.4) | 0 (0) | ||
| 2 |
| Alajuela | 5/29 (17.2) | 2 (20) |
| Guadalupe | 7/55 (12.7) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 8/41 (19.5) | 6 (60) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 5/16 (31.3) | 0 (0) | ||
| Total | 25/141 (17.7) | 8 (80) | ||
| 3 |
| Alajuela | 5/29 (17.2) | 0 (0) |
| Guadalupe | 12/55 (21.8) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 7/41 (17.1) | 0 (0) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 4/16 (25.0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Total | 28/141 (19.9) | 0 (0) | ||
| 4 |
| Alajuela | 1/29 (3.4) | 0 (0) |
| Guadalupe | 5/55 (9.1) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 2/41 (4.9) | 1 (10) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 2/16 (12.5) | 0 (0) | ||
| Total | 10/141 (7.1) | 1 (10) | ||
| 5 |
| Alajuela | 2/29 (6.9) | 0 (0) |
| Guadalupe | 8/55 (14.5) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 4/41 (9.8) | 0 (0) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 1/16 (6.3) | 0 (0) | ||
| Total | 15/141 (10.6) | 0 (0) | ||
| 6 |
| Alajuela | 1/29 (3.4) | 0 (0) |
| Guadalupe | 2/55 (3.6) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 2/41 (4.9) | 0 (0) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 1/16 (6.3) | 0 (0) | ||
| Total | 6/141 (4.3) | 0 (0) | ||
| 7 |
| Alajuela | 6/29 (20.7) | 0 (0) |
| Guadalupe | 7/55 (12.7) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 8/41 (19.5) | 0 (0) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 1/16 (6.3) | 1 (10) | ||
| Total | 22/141 (15.6) | 1 (10) | ||
| 8 |
| Alajuela | 0/29 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Guadalupe | 1/55 (1.8) | 0 (0) | ||
| San José | 1/41 (2.4) | 0 (0) | ||
| Tres Ríos | 0/16 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Total | 2/141 (1.4) | 0 (0) |
*Number of ‘multiresistant microbiomes’. The percentage was calculated from the total number of ‘multiresistant microbiomes’ (n = 10).
Figure 1Possible routes of exposure to ARGs by the doves.