Literature DB >> 28233388

Mother's little helpers: What we know (and don't know) about cooperative infant care in callitrichines.

Wendy M Erb1,2, Leila M Porter3.   

Abstract

Since Darwin (), scientists have been puzzled by how behaviors that impose fitness costs on helpers while benefiting their competitors could evolve through natural selection. Hamilton's () theory of inclusive fitness provided an explanation by showing how cooperative behaviors could be adaptive if directed at closely related kin. Recent studies, however, have begun to question whether kin selection is sufficient to explain cooperative behavior in some species (Bergmüller, Johnstone, Russell, & Bshary, ). Many researchers have instead emphasized the importance of direct fitness benefits for helpers in the evolution of cooperative breeding systems. Furthermore, individuals can vary in who, when, and how much they help, and the factors that affect this variation are poorly understood (Cockburn, ; Heinsohn, ). Cooperative breeders thus provide excellent models for the study of evolutionary theories of cooperation and conflict (Cant, ).
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allocare; cooperative breeding; kin selection; marmosets; tamarins

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28233388     DOI: 10.1002/evan.21516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Anthropol        ISSN: 1060-1538


  8 in total

1.  Reverse audience effects on helping in cooperatively breeding marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  R K Brügger; T Kappeler-Schmalzriedt; J M Burkart
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Critique of Pure Marmoset.

Authors:  Todd M Preuss
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Individual differences in co-representation in three monkey species (Callithrix jacchus, Sapajus apella and Macaca tonkeana) in the joint Simon task: the role of social factors and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Fabia M Miss; Baptiste Sadoughi; Hélène Meunier; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 4.  A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  J M Burkart; J E C Adriaense; R K Brügger; F M Miss; K Wierucka; C P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 5.  The emergence of emotionally modern humans: implications for language and learning.

Authors:  Sarah Blaffer Hrdy; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Marmoset prosociality is intentional.

Authors:  Judith M Burkart; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Higher social tolerance in wild versus captive common marmosets: the role of interdependence.

Authors:  Francisco Edvaldo de Oliveira Terceiro; Maria de Fátima Arruda; Carel P van Schaik; Arrilton Araújo; Judith Maria Burkart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Do marmosets understand others' conversations? A thermography approach.

Authors:  R K Brügger; E P Willems; J M Burkart
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.