| Literature DB >> 28233324 |
Clare McFadden1, Marc F Oxenham1.
Abstract
The ability to identify whether a female has been pregnant or has given birth has significant implications for forensic investigations and bioarcheological research. The meaning of "scars of parturition," their causes, and their significance are a matter of contention, with a substantial literature of re-evaluations and tests of the relationship between pelvic scarring and parity. The aim of this study was to use meta-analytic techniques (the methodological approach) to test whether pelvic scarring, namely dorsal pubic pitting and the preauricular groove, is a predictor of parity and sex. Meta-analyses indicated that neither dorsal pubic pitting nor the preauricular groove are predictors of parity status, while dorsal pubic pitting is a moderate predictor of sex. A weak relationship between dorsal pubic pitting and parity was identified, but this is believed to be a product of the moderate relationship with sex. This calls into question whether any causal relationship between parity and pelvic scarring exists.Keywords: forensic anthropology; forensic science; parity estimation; parturition; pregnancy; sex estimation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28233324 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Forensic Sci ISSN: 0022-1198 Impact factor: 1.832