Huanhuan He1, Alan C Chiu1, Masamitsu Kanada2, Bruce T Schaar1, Venkatesh Krishnan1, Christopher H Contag2,3,4, Oliver Dorigo5. 1. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. 2. Departments of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. 3. Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. 4. Departments of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. 5. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. odorigo@stanford.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are often associated with a poor prognosis in cancer. To gain a better understanding of cellular recruitment and dynamics of TAM biology during cancer progression, we established a novel transgenic mouse model for in vivo imaging of luciferase-expressing macrophages. PROCEDURES: B6.129P2-Lyz2tm1(cre)Ifo/J mice, which express Cre recombinase under the control of the lysozyme M promoter (LysM) were crossed to Cre-lox Luc reporter mice (RLG), to produce LysM-LG mice whose macrophages express luciferase. Cell-type-specific luciferase expression in these mice was verified by flow cytometry, and via in vivo bioluminescence imaging under conditions where macrophages were either stimulated with lipopolysaccharide or depleted with clodronate liposomes. The distribution of activated macrophages was longitudinally imaged in two immunocompetent LysM-LG mouse models with either B16 melanoma or ID8 ovarian cancer cells. RESULTS: In vivo imaging of LysM-LG mice showed luciferase activity was generated by macrophages. Clodronate liposome-mediated depletion of macrophages lowered overall bioluminescence while lipopolysaccharide injection increased macrophage bioluminescence in both the B16 and ID8 models. Tracking macrophages weekly in tumor-bearing animals after intraperitoneal (i.p.) or intraovarian (i.o.) injection resulted in distinct, dynamic patterns of macrophage activity. Animals with metastatic ovarian cancer after i.p. injection exhibited significantly higher peritoneal macrophage activity compared to animals after i.o. injection. CONCLUSION: The LysM-LG model allows tracking of macrophage recruitment and activation during disease initiation and progression in a noninvasive manner. This model provides a tool to visualize and monitor the benefit of pharmacological interventions targeting macrophages in preclinical models.
PURPOSE:Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are often associated with a poor prognosis in cancer. To gain a better understanding of cellular recruitment and dynamics of TAM biology during cancer progression, we established a novel transgenic mouse model for in vivo imaging of luciferase-expressing macrophages. PROCEDURES: B6.129P2-Lyz2tm1(cre)Ifo/J mice, which express Cre recombinase under the control of the lysozyme M promoter (LysM) were crossed to Cre-lox Luc reporter mice (RLG), to produce LysM-LG mice whose macrophages express luciferase. Cell-type-specific luciferase expression in these mice was verified by flow cytometry, and via in vivo bioluminescence imaging under conditions where macrophages were either stimulated with lipopolysaccharide or depleted with clodronate liposomes. The distribution of activated macrophages was longitudinally imaged in two immunocompetent LysM-LG mouse models with either B16 melanoma or ID8 ovarian cancer cells. RESULTS: In vivo imaging of LysM-LG mice showed luciferase activity was generated by macrophages. Clodronate liposome-mediated depletion of macrophages lowered overall bioluminescence while lipopolysaccharide injection increased macrophage bioluminescence in both the B16 and ID8 models. Tracking macrophages weekly in tumor-bearing animals after intraperitoneal (i.p.) or intraovarian (i.o.) injection resulted in distinct, dynamic patterns of macrophage activity. Animals with metastatic ovarian cancer after i.p. injection exhibited significantly higher peritoneal macrophage activity compared to animals after i.o. injection. CONCLUSION: The LysM-LG model allows tracking of macrophage recruitment and activation during disease initiation and progression in a noninvasive manner. This model provides a tool to visualize and monitor the benefit of pharmacological interventions targeting macrophages in preclinical models.
Authors: Masamitsu Kanada; Michael H Bachmann; Jonathan W Hardy; Daniel Omar Frimannson; Laura Bronsart; Andrew Wang; Matthew D Sylvester; Tobi L Schmidt; Roger L Kaspar; Manish J Butte; A C Matin; Christopher H Contag Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Frederic Geissmann; Markus G Manz; Steffen Jung; Michael H Sieweke; Miriam Merad; Klaus Ley Journal: Science Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Stephanie M Pyonteck; Leila Akkari; Alberto J Schuhmacher; Robert L Bowman; Lisa Sevenich; Daniela F Quail; Oakley C Olson; Marsha L Quick; Jason T Huse; Virginia Teijeiro; Manu Setty; Christina S Leslie; Yoko Oei; Alicia Pedraza; Jianan Zhang; Cameron W Brennan; James C Sutton; Eric C Holland; Dylan Daniel; Johanna A Joyce Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Anastasiya S Poltavets; Polina A Vishnyakova; Andrey V Elchaninov; Gennady T Sukhikh; Timur Kh Fatkhudinov Journal: Cells Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 6.600