| Literature DB >> 28233080 |
Lauren J Taylor1,2,3, Valsamma Eapen4,5, Murray Maybery6,4, Sue Midford4,7, Jessica Paynter4,8,9, Lyndsay Quarmby10, Timothy Smith4,11, Katrina Williams4,12,13,14, Andrew J O Whitehouse4,15.
Abstract
Previous research shows inconsistency in clinician-assigned diagnoses of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). We conducted an exploratory study that examined the concordance of diagnoses between a multidisciplinary assessment team and a range of independent clinicians throughout Australia. Nine video-taped Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) assessments were collected from two Australian sites. Twenty-seven Australian health professionals each observed two video-recordings and rated the degree to which the individual met the DSM-5 criteria for ASD. There was 100% agreement on the diagnostic classification for only 3 of the 9 video clips (33%), with the remaining 6 clips (66%) reaching poor reliability. In addition, only 24% of the participating clinicians achieved 'good' or 'excellent' levels of agreement (Cohen's kappa > 0.6) with the original ASD assessment. These findings have implications for clinical guidelines for ASD assessments.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnosis; Reliability
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28233080 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-017-3054-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Autism Dev Disord ISSN: 0162-3257