Erik N Mayer1, Sara M Lenherr1, Heidi A Hanson1, Terry C Jessop1, William T Lowrance2. 1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: will.lowrance@hci.utah.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the publication productivity of academic urologists in the United States by gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gender inequality is prevalent in most surgical subspecialties, including urology. Despite small numbers of women in academic positions, differences in scholarly impact by gender are relatively unknown. We assembled a list of 1922 academic urologists (1686 men (87.7%), 236 women (12.3%)) at 124 academic institutions throughout the United States as of February 2016. Scopus and Google Scholar were queried for bibliometric data on each individual, including h-index and m-quotient. We analyzed these metrics for both genders by educational background, subspecialty, National Institutes of Health funding, and academic rank. RESULTS: Men had higher median h-indices than women overall (P < .05), and had higher successive academic ranks (P < .05). Proportionally fewer women attained senior academic ranking (professor/chair), (P < .05). There was no difference in research productivity by successive rank after controlling for career duration (m-quotient). Women were more likely to choose a practice that specialized in pediatric urology or female urology/pelvic reconstructive surgery than their male counterparts (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Women represent a growing proportion of academic urology faculty, but despite the recent increase in number entering the field, relatively few women occupy senior leadership positions. Improving psychosocial barriers to advancement such as lack of mentorship or discriminatory policies may help pioneering female urologists as they progress in their careers.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the publication productivity of academic urologists in the United States by gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gender inequality is prevalent in most surgical subspecialties, including urology. Despite small numbers of women in academic positions, differences in scholarly impact by gender are relatively unknown. We assembled a list of 1922 academic urologists (1686 men (87.7%), 236 women (12.3%)) at 124 academic institutions throughout the United States as of February 2016. Scopus and Google Scholar were queried for bibliometric data on each individual, including h-index and m-quotient. We analyzed these metrics for both genders by educational background, subspecialty, National Institutes of Health funding, and academic rank. RESULTS:Men had higher median h-indices than women overall (P < .05), and had higher successive academic ranks (P < .05). Proportionally fewer women attained senior academic ranking (professor/chair), (P < .05). There was no difference in research productivity by successive rank after controlling for career duration (m-quotient). Women were more likely to choose a practice that specialized in pediatric urology or female urology/pelvic reconstructive surgery than their male counterparts (P < .05). CONCLUSION:Women represent a growing proportion of academic urology faculty, but despite the recent increase in number entering the field, relatively few women occupy senior leadership positions. Improving psychosocial barriers to advancement such as lack of mentorship or discriminatory policies may help pioneering female urologists as they progress in their careers.
Authors: Anita P Mayer; Janis E Blair; Marcia G Ko; Sharonne N Hayes; Yu-Hui H Chang; Suzanne L Caubet; Julia A Files Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Jean Anderson Eloy; Peter Svider; Sujana S Chandrasekhar; Qasim Husain; Kevin M Mauro; Michael Setzen; Soly Baredes Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Jean Anderson Eloy; Peter F Svider; Deepa V Cherla; Lucia Diaz; Olga Kovalerchik; Kevin M Mauro; Soly Baredes; Sujana S Chandrasekhar Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: P L Carr; A S Ash; R H Friedman; A Scaramucci; R C Barnett; L Szalacha; A Palepu; M A Moskowitz Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1998-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Emma B Holliday; Reshma Jagsi; Lynn D Wilson; Mehee Choi; Charles R Thomas; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Katherine B Santosa; Ellen L Larson; Bianca Vannucci; Jodi B Lapidus; Katherine M Gast; Erika D Sears; Jennifer F Waljee; Amy M Suiter; Cathy C Sarli; Susan E Mackinnon; Alison K Snyder-Warwick Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Teodora C Dumitra; Roshni Alam; Julio F Fiore; Juan Mata; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou; Carmen Mueller; Lawrence Lee; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sara P Myers; Katherine M Reitz; Charles B Wessel; Matthew D Neal; Jennifer A Corbelli; Leslie R M Hausmann; Matthew R Rosengart Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Sarah Chauvin; Benoit H Mulsant; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Vicky Stergiopoulos; Valerie H Taylor; Simone N Vigod Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo; Javier González de Dios; Joan Aleixandre-Agulló; Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Vi Nguyen; Rebecca A Marmor; Sonia L Ramamoorthy; Sarah L Blair; Bryan M Clary; Jason K Sicklick Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ruchika Talwar; Adrien Bernstein; Amanda Jones; Juanita Crook; Andrea B Apolo; Jennifer M Taylor; Lauren M Burke; Elizabeth R Plimack; Sima P Porten; Kirsten L Greene; Sarah P Psutka; Angela B Smith Journal: Urology Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 2.633